Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hey guys, just wanting to double check since it's been a a year since my last claims mediation, this is the best stance to have during the mediation right?: "I am willing to be flexible by not taking Evri to court to get a judgement against  them and i'm willing to settle now. but I'm not here to compromise on my rights or the amount i'm owed as I have all the rights in this claim and Evri know this, despite what they may say now. I do not wish to waste the courts time and our time, it's Evri who are being inflexible and they are just wasting evryones time if the are not just paying up now. they should just offer the full £ and we can proceed The function of mediation is not to persuade you to give up some of your rights. The function of mediation is to help you obtain what you are entitled to without having to go to court and without having to inconvenience or trouble anyone further. The benefit to the defendant is that they are saved the expense and the inconvenience of going to court." I can also bring up that 1. they no showed this court in our previous mediation call and wasted all our time, and 2. they already settled in full with me last year on an identical parcel and case so we're going down the same road?
    • Regarding SARs - does the recipient provide hard or digital copies of info?  I sent out a request recently. All the info was digital and I'd like it sent digitally - for expedience -  but they want to post hard copies.  Can I demand digitally?  If it's hard then I will have to labour over scanning it all back in to my computer - which is a waste of my resources.  I had this issue recently with a lawyer - they said they had too much info to send by email. Yet miraculously found a way within 2h. (It would be useful to have hard copies too - but in terms of short-term follow up communication digital is best for me)
    • As the tories declare they will do all sorts of err things they had already promised, and often actually themselves blocked,  including 40 hospitals policy, ground rent caps, abolishing no-fault evictions and restoring historic train lines .. all feature in the 2019 and 2024 documents.   .. in perhaps better news Man, 46, arrested in connection with criminal investigation into PPE Medpro | UK news | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Suspect understood to have been arrested on suspicion of offences including conspiracy to commit fraud  
    • 1000's of people here, Inc members of the team have on going issues like Mental health... But it shouldn't be used as a general get out excuse.  You vanished for a month doing nothing... . .....  Move on.  Dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

One does not use the word "and" to start a sentence, nor should one use semi and full colons with such gay abandon.... On being shown a list of "courses" that I might be interested in, I suggested some of the present staff would benefit more from the "Basic English and Grammar" course.

 

Also offered to provide them with some books entitled "The Complete Idiots Guide to Grammar and Style".biggrin1.gif

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hard to resist, isn't it - sometimes they make it so easy. I often ask my advisor 'How's the job outcome payments going then?' or perhaps 'Are you getting many sustainment payments from your job outcomes then?'. Or my favourite..'How's the performance figures doing this month; have you reached the DWP requirements yet?'.

 

Usually just gets a grunt in reply as apparently we aren't supposed to know about such things :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

One does not use the word "and" to start a sentence, nor should one use semi and full colons with such gay abandon.... On being shown a list of "courses" that I might be interested in, I suggested some of the present staff would benefit more from the "Basic English and Grammar" course.

 

Also offered to provide them with some books entitled "The Complete Idiots Guide to Grammar and Style".biggrin1.gif

 

 

Actually - you can start a sentence with a conjunction .... it's usually used for effect or emphasis :-)

 

BUT, I wouldn't use it in business letters

 

 

Imp! :-)

BA (Hons) English with History

Link to post
Share on other sites

One does not use the word "and" to start a sentence, nor should one use semi and full colons with such gay abandon.... On being shown a list of "courses" that I might be interested in, I suggested some of the present staff would benefit more from the "Basic English and Grammar" course.

 

Also offered to provide them with some books entitled "The Complete Idiots Guide to Grammar and Also offered to provide them with some books entitled "The Complete Idiots Guide to Grammar and Style".

 

Do you mean 'Idiot's Guide' with an apostrophe? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

One does not use the word "and" to start a sentence, nor should one use semi and full colons with such gay abandon.... On being shown a list of "courses" that I might be interested in, I suggested some of the present staff would benefit more from the "Basic English and Grammar" course.

 

Also offered to provide them with some books entitled "The Complete Idiots Guide to Grammar and Also offered to provide them with some books entitled "The Complete Idiots Guide to Grammar and Style".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do you mean 'Idiot's Guide' with an apostrophe? :lol:

 

or Idiots'

as there's certainly more than one of them.

 

(11+ failure)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I signed the other week my advisor ,who is a nice guy asked how it was going with Ingeus. I said my advisor had been ill for nearly three weeks (she's still off now). I was told I should be seeing a an interim advisor whilst she's off! Anyone been told this. The office I attend always has 2/3 advisors absent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Others have indicated that some advisers are "nice" in a face to face situation, yet will stab you in the back when it suits their needs - Never take these people at face value and always treat them with an air of suspicion and caution. Indeed, one I had was all sweet and charming at the first meeting, subsequent meetings were more like a one sided fight in a dragon pit.

 

In answer to your question: The whole industry is based on staff working on short term contracts with impossible targets to hit. As a consequence, turnover is high, and any number could be off pulling stress related sickies. That your (normal) adviser has been absent for three weeks is of little surprise and don't hold out much hope for an early return (if at all).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I signed the other week my advisor ,who is a nice guy asked how it was going with Ingeus. I said my advisor had been ill for nearly three weeks (she's still off now). I was told I should be seeing a an interim advisor whilst she's off! Anyone been told this. The office I attend always has 2/3 advisors absent.

 

That's cos they are also sick of the place!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, just looking for a bit of advice really on what to do?

 

I'm 20 and been with Ingeus for around 9 months now but from the 10th of April - 9th May they have stopped my JSA as I missed a few appointments due to tonsilitis over the past 2 months as I get it quite severe resulting in me not able to attend.

 

The thing that has annoyed me is that I had an appointment a couple of weeks ago and my advisor asked in general chit chat what I was up to for the rest of the week which I said I was going to a concert the next day (bare in mind I had no appointments with them

nor was this in the standard 9 -5 hours) so she just asked who I was going to see and all was well.

 

Anywho, I missed appointmnts on the 27th & 28th March due to me having tonsilitis all week really but she informed the job centre that I missed it due to going to a concert resulting in them stopping my benefits for a month. As you can imagine I was pretty annoyed about this and I have sent off my appeal form and explained in detail, she also pointed out that I hadn't sent her an email for missing an appointment earlier that month when I have proof of the email sent as I was ill then also. I do job search a lot and definitely do more than what is required by their standards and never had a problem with them before.

 

It just amazes me that they are absolutely fine with me having no money what so ever for over a month yet are happy to take £4000 if they find me a job or I give my details to them! I signed the consent form so should I when I next have an appointment ask to remove my consent? It's really annoyed me as I don't know what I'm meant to live on till I next get money on the 24th of May, thanks.

 

This doesn't surprise me at all about ingeus, this is why i tell them NOTHING about my social life or personal life for that matter.

some body i know had an appointment with ingeus 2 weeks ago, her sister was rushed to hospital the day of the appointment. so she rung up to say she couldn't attend as was at hospital with sister, advisor at the time said it was fine that she'd make her a new appointment which she would send in post. 3 days later she got a letter from job centre to say she her JSA was being stopped as she hadn't attending a WP appointment! :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The JC can't simply stop anyone's benefit - they have to notify you first a doubt has been raised (and keep paying in the meantime) then you get the chance to put your side of the story (still while being paid) then your benefit is only stopped after a decision is made..and not by the JC either. Even if your benefit is stopped, you're given notice to prepare (or at least that's what should happen; I know it doesn't a lot of the time though)

 

The JC sometimes ask me how it's going with Ingeus but you can tell it's just making conversation - they haven't the slightest interest in whether the course is wonderful or abysmal as long as I'm attending it as per the requirements. If you need to complain about Ingeus, do it yourself because the 'anything for a quiet life' JC certainly won't do it for you. They'll happily agree that the WP aren't very good but they don't want to know about your complaints.

 

I've been asked if I have 'regular' appointments with Ingeus (which thankfully I don't) and I usually reply 'yes, I regularly see them once in a while' :)

 

... reminds of the time a brand new pub opened in town and the doorman stopped me going in... because I wasn't a regular. I politely said 'the place has just opened - there are no regulars yet unless you start letting people in'. He pondered this for a while then said 'well okay then, in you go'. People are brilliant aren't they?

Edited by jasta11
Link to post
Share on other sites

The JC can't simply stop anyone's benefit - they have to notify you first a doubt has been raised (and keep paying in the meantime) then you get the chance to put your side of the story (still while being paid) then your benefit is only stopped after a decision is made..and not by the JC either. Even if your benefit is stopped, you're given notice to prepare (or at least that's what should happen; I know it doesn't a lot of the time though)

 

 

This is of course how it should happen but doesn't most of the time, Ingeus once tried to get me into trouble for not attending an appointment (one i didnt even know i had) due to the fact they had swapped me to a new advisor and booked me an appointment via the post which i didnt get. even through i had one with my old advisor! JC were ok about it and i didnt lose my money..

 

Talking of ingeus ive been told i am now with a new advisor(this will be my 3rd one) as i am now on the next stage whats the next stage anyone know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't care either bunch of idiots the lot of them.

 

well what comes around goes around so one day they'll find themselves in the same position we are in, i have to try very hard not to patronise them haha :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is of course how it should happen but doesn't most of the time, Ingeus once tried to get me into trouble for not attending an appointment (one i didnt even know i had) due to the fact they had swapped me to a new advisor and booked me an appointment via the post which i didnt get. even through i had one with my old advisor! JC were ok about it and i didnt lose my money..

 

Talking of ingeus ive been told i am now with a new advisor(this will be my 3rd one) as i am now on the next stage whats the next stage anyone know?

 

 

Have Ingeus sent you on any courses with other providers yet? That might be the next stage, (if you haven't already done this). I'm in your area and was sent to Learning Links up on Westgate Road for 18 weeks which involved 'Employability' course, a very basic 'Business Admin' course and odd things. Did me no good as I'm already well skilled but it got me away from Ingeus and I have to honestly say the people at Learning Links were very nice; actual human beings with a sense of humour. Loads of food too - and free chocolate; you certainly won't starve!

 

If you do have to get sent somewhere, ask to go there - at least you know you'll be treated properly. I'd have happily stayed there for my 2 years if I'd had the choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Ingeus sent you on any courses with other providers yet? That might be the next stage, (if you haven't already done this). I'm in your area and was sent to Learning Links up on Westgate Road for 18 weeks which involved 'Employability' course, a very basic 'Business Admin' course and odd things. Did me no good as I'm already well skilled but it got me away from Ingeus and I have to honestly say the people at Learning Links were very nice; actual human beings with a sense of humour. Loads of food too - and free chocolate; you certainly won't starve!

 

If you do have to get sent somewhere, ask to go there - at least you know you'll be treated properly. I'd have happily stayed there for my 2 years if I'd had the choice.

 

speaking of other providers, a friend of a friend has been sent to a provider called 'ats' for 16 weeks by ingeus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please NOTE: Forum Rules :

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?9-Forum-rules.-Please-read-these-before-posting

 

 

1.8 Bank and other company staff: Whether you like them or not, they are just doing their job. Please do not refer to these people in any personal insulting or offensive way. They are not the policymakers in their organisations and are only doing a job.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please NOTE: Forum Rules :

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?9-Forum-rules.-Please-read-these-before-posting

 

 

1.8 Bank and other company staff: Whether you like them or not, they are just doing their job. Please do not refer to these people in any personal insulting or offensive way. They are not the policymakers in their organisations and are only doing a job.

 

Does the rules also say that we should not praise them in the interests of equality and fairness :-)

 

Just pulling your leg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Ingeus sent you on any courses with other providers yet? That might be the next stage, (if you haven't already done this). I'm in your area and was sent to Learning Links up on Westgate Road for 18 weeks which involved 'Employability' course, a very basic 'Business Admin' course and odd things. Did me no good as I'm already well skilled but it got me away from Ingeus and I have to honestly say the people at Learning Links were very nice; actual human beings with a sense of humour. Loads of food too - and free chocolate; you certainly won't starve!

 

If you do have to get sent somewhere, ask to go there - at least you know you'll be treated properly. I'd have happily stayed there for my 2 years if I'd had the choice.

 

Are you looking at doing admin work or would they just send anyone on a course like this? I would never never never be able to do an admin job. I cant spell, I cant write, type or use computers and stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the rules also say that we should not praise them in the interests of equality and fairness :-)

 

Just pulling your leg.

 

Yeah. I think the purpose of that rule is obvious. Every so often, someone in one of these "hated" organisations such as banks, the DWP and yes, even WP staffers, shows up here and offers useful advice and insight.

 

So if such a person helps you, by all means praise them. And if they don't help you because they've turned up here in their own free time to offer assistance and they've received abuse in return...?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you looking at doing admin work or would they just send anyone on a course like this? I would never never never be able to do an admin job. I cant spell, I cant write, type or use computers and stuff.

 

Intentionally affected stupidity will neither fool nor impress anyone. You will not get around WP requirements or avoid their ridiculous "courses" by pretending that there's no job you could possibly do because you're too thick. I do believe that WP advisers lack the training and experience they need to do their jobs but most of them are not, fundamentally, idiots.

 

More useful would to look at the DWP guidelines as to what's "reasonable under a participant's circumstances", I'd have thought. If you've already done a job that involves sending letters and using computers, why should you need a course to teach you these skills?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if such a person helps you, by all means praise them.

 

Agreed - To be fair, I did meet one WP staffer that (on the face of it) showed genuine concern for me. But she was only the receptionist with minimal powers or authority.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Intentionally affected stupidity will neither fool nor impress anyone. You will not get around WP requirements or avoid their ridiculous "courses" by pretending that there's no job you could possibly do because you're too thick. I do believe that WP advisers lack the training and experience they need to do their jobs but most of them are not, fundamentally, idiots.

 

More useful would to look at the DWP guidelines as to what's "reasonable under a participant's circumstances", I'd have thought. If you've already done a job that involves sending letters and using computers, why should you need a course to teach you these skills?

 

Refresher courses? Courses to give you a qualification? Money is paid to the drone regardless of course isn't it?

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed - To be fair, I did meet one WP staffer that (on the face of it) showed genuine concern for me. But she was only the receptionist with minimal powers or authority.

All things being equal, if any Welfare To Work Plebutente had any good idea, they would presumably sell that idea to their organisation, and in due course, the success rate associated with the Work Programme would be appreciably better than it is. They do appreciate that a "Success Rate" of 2% isn't the proportion of the unemployed who remain unemployed and who should be in employment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...