Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

There is a god, 1st Credit gets a SERIOUS slap from OFT - Re Stat Demands etc


Curlyben
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

At long last the OFT has taken action against unfair issuance of SD's and other misleading activities from our favourite DCA, First Credit Ltd

 

OFT imposes requirements on 1st Credit over debt collection practices

 

20/09 25 February 2009

 

The OFT has taken action against 1st Credit Ltd requiring the company to improve its debt collection practices.

 

The OFT has imposed 'requirements' on 1st Credit using consumer credit powers, after an investigation found that some of its business processes and procedures failed to meet satisfactory standards. As a result, 1st Credit Ltd and its associated companies must:

 

* refrain from issuing statutory demands warning of bankruptcy where it is unlikely that proceedings will be initiated

* not discuss legal action with consumers unless it is likely that such action will be taken

* ensure that sensitive cases involving vulnerable individuals, for example those with mental health or medical problems, are dealt with appropriately, and

* ensure that all matters of concern raised with them by the free advice sector and other third parties are dealt with appropriately.

 

1st Credit must also report back to the OFT every six months providing statistics regarding the number of enforcement actions it has taken against debtors.

 

Failure to comply with the requirements could lead to a fine of up to £50,000 for occurance and/or possible revocation of 1st Credit's consumer credit licence.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/news/press/2009/20-09 - PRESS RELEASE

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/press_release_attachments/1stcreditrequirements.pdf - 1ST CREDITS / CONNAUGHTS / LCS DIRECTIVES

  • Haha 2

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

FANTASTIC NEWS oh i like that bit about vulnerable people,

 

well oft i applaud you finally got the gears from stalling at the first post

 

im enjoying all this now,

 

laters angel x:D

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently dealing, as an authorised rep, with 1st Credit, who have continued to harass the client by phone whilst in default of a CCA. I've now made a formal complaint and rang them this morning to clarify a point (namely that they have continued to leave phone messages); they were very polite and at pains to assure me that the complaint would be properly dealt with and no further contact made with my client. Maybe the OFT has grown some at last!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot emphasise this stongly enough;

when a DCA uses Unfair Practices;

report the matter to Consumer Direct and to the OFT...

 

remember, the OFT's wheel's turn very slowly, but if consumers do not complain, then the OFT will never know what has and/is occurring!

 

COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN!!!

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT told me to contact the Information Commissioner about Next and their lack of CCA.

 

The Information Commissioner told me that Next don't need to have a signed CCA because the Data Protection Act doesn't state they need a signed contract.

 

Totally confused with that lot.

 

The ICO told me to email all my documents and they will look into it.. but doesn't that interfere if I start court proceedings? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I tried to complain via consumer direct about Lloyds and their 'representatives' I was told they didn't do this and I would have to go to the FOS after going through Lloyds formal complaints procedure so I will be emailing OFT using the address above

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great.............sorry to be a wet blanket. My only concern is who decides whats 'valid' or not the debtor or 1st Credit or even the OFT who have proven previously that they think we shouldn't use a 'technicality' to avoid paying a debt, even though that 'technicality' is based in law:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's great news that the OFT have been finally prodded into action but being the cynical gal I am, suspect it had more to do with the expose of First Credit on Panorama some months ago than it did the mountainous piles of complaints from CAgers & others.

 

Still a long way to go in the battle I fear...

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I stated on the Lowell's UK26 thread this still seems very weak as in all things OFT.

 

It appears to allow 1st credit to "interpret" the guidelines ie

 

"It is commercislly viable" (In whose opinion?)

 

"The case has been fully reviewed" (by whom?) "& is considered reasonable" (Reasonable by 1st credit standars?)

 

All I can see is a load of "we thought we were doing as we were told" Another load of complaints to the OFT that'll take 9 months to address, meanwhile Farce Crudite will be bullying and intimidating as per usual.

 

The only positive thing it does is highlight how seriously these low life bottom feeders are prepared to flout Laws and government guidelines

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it matters about if it was the bad press on tv or mass complaints from people taking advice from consumer forums.

 

What matters is in the current climate the media are now taking notice of our DCA horror stories, and action is being taken against them. If we're to take a few DCA's down. Now is the best chance we will ever get to hit them where it hurts most.

 

The more bad press they get and the more complaints we make, the stronger we'll become. But we are winning. Look at how many cases CAG members have won recently. UK26 has Experien and Lowells looking like frightened rabbits in car headlights. In what should be golden times for DCA's, some of them are struggling.

 

We have nothing to lose apart from a little bit of time/stamps/and paper. :D

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's good to see something is being done and handy to know the circumstances which the OFT takes a dim view of; I'm of poor health, low income, no job and have no assets, for instance.

 

However, I think it's wholly inadequate that they rely on complaints - how can the mentally ill complain for instance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a heartwarming announcement,it was a long time coming but have the OFT finally developed some teeth.

 

It was an SD from Connaught(on behalf of 1st Credit) that bought me to this site so I am delighted to say that I've become a statistic in what could become 1st Credit's downfall.

 

It may take a while longer to bring them down but the tide does seem to be turning at last.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...