Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells Customers- Put them on notice!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you admit to a DCA getting a Notice of Assignment by ordinary post would this not then 'rectify' the service

 

Good question and quite likely the answer is 'YES'. Written acknowledgement of receipt is pretty incontovertible proof the document has been served. Still arguable that it's not compliant with 196(4) but a much weaker argument IMO.

 

This assumes that such notice is valid in all other respects which tbh is likely.

 

It does not however validate any action taken prior to the date of acknowledgment.

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks for all your legal efforts guys, it really it appreciated

 

I'll take it that in the normal course, an NOA is incontrovertible, and only is worth taking a case up against if they issue defaults or charges, PRIOR to the assignment

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The big problem for Lowells is that their notices appear to be very often non existant or otherwise invalid.

This can be for any number of reasons, the most common are:

 

A notice served by postal service is only deemed served if it complies with the requirements set out in Sec 196 of the Law of Property Act 1925 Ie. recorded or registered delivery.

If the date on the notice is innacurate then the notice is invalid.

No date on the notice or no signature on the notice does not invalidate the notice in itself." TLD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question -

 

Im paying Red an HSBC student account debt which has about 2 payments left on it. I cant remember having anything like a notice of assignment.

 

Does this apply to bank accounts as well??? And if so, can I demand my money back for them getting money out of me under false pretences??

THE PRETENDER AGENDA - August 30,2008 - 2ND ROW!!! WOO-HOO!! :-)

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR A FAB NITE LEE! xx

Sunderland 011008 - THE BEST BIRTHDAY PRESSIE EVER! 'Aww, it's your birthday! Happy birthday darlin!'

 

02 Apr 2008, 23:55

OfficialLeeRyan wrote:

i like that!! its simple and good and gets the fans involved aswell x x x

 

MY SUCCESSES -

 

1st Credit (Lloyds TSB) admitted no CCA, reply from OFT 130608, reply from FOS 040608, adjudication stage rejected but still no contact....

 

My mate (Littlewoods/Moorcroft)

300608 -Long running battle,threatening court, CCA letter NO 2 and harrassment letter sent - passed back to Littlewoods early July.

070808 - Passed to Debt Managers, Acct in dispute/BOG OFF letter sent 080808...

140808 - Letter from Debt Managers passing debt back to Littlewoods - RESULT! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fascinating read.

 

I dont know if CL Finance is part of Lowells but reading this thread raises questions with NOA from CL Finance.

 

After getting into difficult times I managed to get GE/Debenhams Store Card to accept lower payments, no sooner after setting up this arrangement I received a NOA from CL Finance (by normal post) stating that they now owned the debt and to continue the payment plan but send all payments to them also as I was on a payment plan a default notice would be put on my credit file as a condition of the payment plan.

 

Sorry if this is not part of Lowells group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to feel left out s Lowells aren't one of my playmates.......however......I think I will have to look at all my other paperwork.

Thank you for all your efforts on this and 'other'threads.

 

LOL. Dont worry, its not personal, the idiots are sooo snowed under what with UK26's case and others going for their throat. You wouldnt want them to not concentrate on your case would you,?:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi please can you tell me if this is a valid deed of assignment received from lowell group, they have said that a copy of the assignment is not held on their systems and the letter they sent on the 10th November 2007 is sufficient enough. Hope someone can help. Thanx

Deed of Assignment - Anderton.doc[1].pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gypsy so your 'agreement ' was made in USA??

If so it's not going to be enforceable under UK common law.

Send off the CCA request to Lowells pronto and see what turns up.

They should have sent you a notice of assignment also, by Registered post , if not then its not been served correctly, Thats just for starters.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

For any of you interested, this is the link to my Lowells thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/164356-lowells-again-12.html#post1989899

 

I am taking the information from this thread and cpr 31.16 to bamboozle lowells. I probably won't post it until monday so long as there are no edits to do so all welcome to praise me or shoot me down :D

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad form to quote oneself but I forgot one other important consideration.

 

 

The OC will have claimed tax relief from HMRC under the deed of sale.

Since the OC is still title holder of the account where no valid assignment has been effected in law this could mean some very serious implications for the original creditors in these cases.

They have claimed relief for a loss they have not made.

 

 

Oh thats just ruddy priceless.. they'll have rev&customs after them in a shot :D:D:D:D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i already sent them and received a subject to access request and Monument as well but no copy Deed of Assignment was sent, this was emailed to me from someone at lowell and from monument no default notice just this copy of credit agreement below i have now give them 7 days to produce the default notice but they have took their default notice off and lowell have put one on instead this is what i am trying to get removed but up to now they will not budge.

55.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for that, but i never received the deed of assignment by registered post and also both sars to monument and lowell neither included a copy of the default notice which i have given monument 7 days to produce, if after 7 days i dont receive it what would be my next step. Hope you can help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gypsy just read your posts and want to clarify some areas if ok with you.

 

1. according to the fax copy of assignment the debt was sold to lowell on 31st Oct 2007

 

2. 10th November 2007 lowells say they sent by post a letter to say they now own the debt and cough up. (did you rec this letter and if you did was it sent registered or recorded post if not it doesn't meet the requirements?)

 

3. OC have removed the default notice on your credit file (do you know when?)

 

4. Lowells have now put a default on your file for the debt (same question do you know when they did this?)

 

5. SAR requests from both OC & lowells dont show the either the defaults, NOA or deed of assignment

 

IMHO you have lowells and compucredit on a number of points. In particular I would say that as the assignment you have posted is dated the 9th of Feb 2009 and from I have read & understand from UK26 thread is that the assignment only became lawful on this date and therefore any action that lowells have taken such as registering the default is unlawful.

 

I'm sure that other much more qualified people will be able to either confirm I've got things right and if not explain your position and point you in the right direction.

 

I'll check back later :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi not sure when monument defaulted but lowells said default date was september on credit file but they but theirs on nov and showed d december 2007 as well, the deed of assignment was not sent by registered post but i was the one that asked monument to remove the default last year sometime when i saw it on credit file as there would have been two on for same debt. I have asked lowell to remove the default but they will not budge, just waiting to see now if i receive copy of default notice off monument, when i have checked the credit ref agencies, lowell have said the default was satisfied on different dates on each one surely they must put the right settlement date on for a start so they all the dates match up. I also do not believe the cca is right either, what do you think. It is nice to hear from someone who may be able to help me as i am at a lost what to do next. I have sent lowell a request to stop processing my data but not heard anything about that either. Hope someone can help. Sorry its so long. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...