Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you IGNORE THEM. stop being had blind nothing anyone can do to you. dx  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Name County Court   MCOL Northampton N1 ?yes Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ? Yes If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)     Name of the Claimant ? Give answer here Lowell How many defendant's  joint or self ? Give answer here Self 1 Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. Give answer here 08 may  ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down. state how many digits the account number has.. Give answer here  the claim is for sum of 1650£ due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for capital one account with an account reference of xxxx tge dependent failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s87(1) of the consumer credit act 1973 which has not been complied with the debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 18/03-21 notice of which has been given to defendant  the claim incudes statutory interest under s69 of the county court act 184 at a rate of 8%per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of 132£ the claimant claims the sum of 1782£   What is the total value of the claim? Give answer here 1977£ Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Give answer here Not sure  received a letter on 24 march stating Letter of claim- you have 30 days to prevent legal action Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Give answer here No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Give answer here Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Give answer here Credit card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Give answer here After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Give answer here Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Give answer here Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Give answer here Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Give answer here Unsure Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Give answer here Unsure Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Give answer here Not that he recalls Why did you cease payments? Give answer here Lost job What was the date of your last payment? Give answer here Feb 2023 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Give answer here No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Give answer here No What you need to do now.    Answer the questions above   If you have not already done so – send a CCA request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement (If Applicable) (except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)   Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts   Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards     Request 2 - Current Accounts     You may use a CPR part 18 request for any other information (not request documents) that you might require in order to defend yourself. Please note that CPR 18 is specifically for Fast Track claims and although technically the claim has yet to be allocated to a track the claimant may refuse to comply for this reason.   If you require CPR Part 18 - this will need to be drafted specifically.   If you are not planning on defending for one reason or another – then you will need to complete an Income and Expenditure form and contact the Solicitor with your proposal. The N9a is already enclosed in the claim pack for Admittance which should be sent to the solicitor named on the claim form   If you are considering making a partial admittance N9b must be completed and returned to the court. Please note in most cases a partial admittance will result in an automatic CCJ for the amount admitted.   You have received a Claim - What you need to do.pdf1.33 MB · 241 downloads     Before Printing the PDF TIP   If you DO NOT wish to print Page 1 (Cover Page) of the PDF, please ensure to do the following:   Ensure you go to your Printer Settings and set it to 'Print from Page 2' (this way Page 1 (Cover Page) should not print out).   Note: This will save you Ink & Paper    
    • 3 threads merged for complete history of your debts. i suggest you re read from post 1 again. what are you doing still blindly paying a DCA on a historic debt?  
    • Hi, I have an old outstanding debt from 1994 due to MBNA for £20,000. The debt has been passed to various DCAs and is currently with PRA Group.  I sent them a CCA letter in January 2024. They acknowledged this letter and stated they would come back when they had more information, however the information did not arrive within the 12 working day scenario.. I have just received a copy of the agreement which goes back to 1994 from them. In their response letter they have stated " Please find enclosed documentation received to date: we are waiting further documents in order to complete your request. We have currently deemed this debt as unenforceable which means we are not able to take court or further action against you to recover the outstanding balance". They then go on to state "we are still legally entitled to:  1.Contact you to ask and repay what you owe 2.Pass your details onto a third party collection agency 3. Continue to report your account with the credit reference bureaux (as appropriate)". I'm at a loss as to what I should do next and would appreciate any guidance on this matter. I am currently paying £5.00 pcm. TIA      
    • A sinister tactic known as shoulder surfing is on the rise in the UK. Fraudsters are watching unwitting people log in to their mobile banking apps over their shoulder.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The most important thing you'll read all day


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5747 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What the hell are they taking about.....'The Law Society'........as many here know The Law Society only acts in cases of compliant from a lawyers own client not the public at large........I despair......don't these bloody politicians know anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Perhaps we need a specific thread which brings together all of IJ's misdemeanours then when it's about 100 pages long we can send it to the Minister..............& tell him to chew on that

Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree with you .... I'm not sure if we can take it any further ... I suppose we could direct a campaign to James Plaskitt at the DWP (address #74 above) opposing the use of these DCA's based upon the expereinces of CAG members :(

 

Boa.. ..

It's difficult to remember that when you're up to your arse in crocodiles your objective was to drain the swamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over 30 years ago I worked as a junior civil servant in what was then called the Secretary of State'e Private Office. My role as Correspondence Clerk was to log all letters from MPs etc and arrange for some official to draft a reply. The final draft letter went to the junior Minister to sign and if he wanted to add anything other than his signature, he was told not to quibble but sign. Two copies of the signed letter were then sent to the MP. Why? So that the MP could forward it to the consituent with a brief covering letter. Nothing has changed has it!

 

The only was to be effective is for every CAGer to write to their MP and then add a multiplier effect by writing directly to the Secretary of State, the Under sercretary, the Queen, the Prime Minister, the government department itself, your Euro MP, in fact anyone else you care to think about. The letters will all find themselves on the desk of the same official. He will deal with 20 or so letters a day without raising an eyebrow. Give him 20,000 a day and some action may be taken. Otherwise it is simply a waste of time & effort to complain.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over 30 years ago I worked as a junior civil servant in what was then called the Secretary of State'e Private Office. My role as Correspondence Clerk was to log all letters from MPs etc and arrange for some official to draft a reply. The final draft letter went to the junior Minister to sign and if he wanted to add anything other than his signature, he was told not to quibble but sign. Two copies of the signed letter were then sent to the MP. Why? So that the MP could forward it to the consituent with a brief covering letter. Nothing has changed has it!

 

The only was to be effective is for every CAGer to write to their MP and then add a multiplier effect by writing directly to the Secretary of State, the Under sercretary, the Queen, the Prime Minister, the government department itself, your Euro MP, in fact anyone else you care to think about. The letters will all find themselves on the desk of the same official. He will deal with 20 or so letters a day without raising an eyebrow. Give him 20,000 a day and some action may be taken. Otherwise it is simply a waste of time & effort to complain.

 

Well I'll be b......d.

 

You mean 'Private Office' as in now 'Richmond House'???

 

I'll say no more, but I'm getting that "what a small world!!!" feeling. :)

 

The highlighted portion of your last paragraph will seem like overkill to many, but I have stated often enough one must complain to everyone who might listen and might be prepared to do something - even 'St John's Ambulance' if it comes down to it.....

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean 'Private Office' as in now 'Richmond House'???

 

Yes, but before it moved there. I'm very, very old now. Most of the MPs are dead and even the then young political advisers are now 'grandees'.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive any kind of reply? At least an acknowledgement to say they've received your letter. If not, then he's supposed to - I believe MPs are given a very short time limit to respond to initial letters (four days, is it?).

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2c worth.

 

Being a very popular site, I wonder why it is that CAG doesn't organise something along the lines of collecting evidence against specific organisations and then seeking publicity over why the OFT et el are not taking action? Even if the organisors of this site don't have the time, volunteers could be sought - I would be willing.

 

As an individual you can be fobbed off, but with evidence of thousands of abuses, it becomes of interest to the media. To my mind the gov organisations who are supposed to be regulating these organisations are the ones we should be attacking...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2c worth.

 

Being a very popular site, I wonder why it is that CAG doesn't organise something along the lines of collecting evidence against specific organisations and then seeking publicity over why the OFT et el are not taking action? Even if the organisors of this site don't have the time, volunteers could be sought - I would be willing.

 

As an individual you can be fobbed off, but with evidence of thousands of abuses, it becomes of interest to the media. To my mind the gov organisations who are supposed to be regulating these organisations are the ones we should be attacking...

 

I would be up for that .... don't work, eBay is crap, plenty of time to spare nowadays ... not even getting DCA letters to fend off anymore:D

 

Boa ...

 

Oh, while we are at it, I can't even get responses to some of my recent posts on this site ....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/124878-abbey-wescot-4.html

It's difficult to remember that when you're up to your arse in crocodiles your objective was to drain the swamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps we need a specific thread which brings together all of IJ's misdemeanours then when it's about 100 pages long we can send it to the Minister..............& tell him to chew on that

 

 

Theres nothing to stop someone starting one

 

 

And Boa....I think you will find there has been a response to the post you speak of. :)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Ive just read the whole of this thread trying to work out what it was that was on Youtube. I am at work at the moment, Youtube is a blocked site so I cannot get on.

 

Could someone please give me a synopsis of the audio file?

 

Many thanks

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love a synopsis too please because until I visit a friend's house I can't listen to audios.. For some reason my computer's completely silent.

I've just been reading all this thread and am keen to join in with the fight back.

As far as deciding who to vote for at the next election, I think the only hope is for independent candidates to stand in each constituency. I don't think swapping one corrupt political party for another is ever going to get us anywhere but deeper in the mire.

Patma

Link to post
Share on other sites

fab find, i like the voice and the true grit within the voice and the actual explanation that its all "" silly"" but you know the actual word im referring to once you hear the audio LOL

 

its made my day, thanks so much just send my cca yest - see my mbna thread

 

have a good day its been fun so far ciao MAZ

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...