Jump to content


The most important thing you'll read all day


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5730 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What the hell are they taking about.....'The Law Society'........as many here know The Law Society only acts in cases of compliant from a lawyers own client not the public at large........I despair......don't these bloody politicians know anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Perhaps we need a specific thread which brings together all of IJ's misdemeanours then when it's about 100 pages long we can send it to the Minister..............& tell him to chew on that

Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree with you .... I'm not sure if we can take it any further ... I suppose we could direct a campaign to James Plaskitt at the DWP (address #74 above) opposing the use of these DCA's based upon the expereinces of CAG members :(

 

Boa.. ..

It's difficult to remember that when you're up to your arse in crocodiles your objective was to drain the swamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over 30 years ago I worked as a junior civil servant in what was then called the Secretary of State'e Private Office. My role as Correspondence Clerk was to log all letters from MPs etc and arrange for some official to draft a reply. The final draft letter went to the junior Minister to sign and if he wanted to add anything other than his signature, he was told not to quibble but sign. Two copies of the signed letter were then sent to the MP. Why? So that the MP could forward it to the consituent with a brief covering letter. Nothing has changed has it!

 

The only was to be effective is for every CAGer to write to their MP and then add a multiplier effect by writing directly to the Secretary of State, the Under sercretary, the Queen, the Prime Minister, the government department itself, your Euro MP, in fact anyone else you care to think about. The letters will all find themselves on the desk of the same official. He will deal with 20 or so letters a day without raising an eyebrow. Give him 20,000 a day and some action may be taken. Otherwise it is simply a waste of time & effort to complain.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over 30 years ago I worked as a junior civil servant in what was then called the Secretary of State'e Private Office. My role as Correspondence Clerk was to log all letters from MPs etc and arrange for some official to draft a reply. The final draft letter went to the junior Minister to sign and if he wanted to add anything other than his signature, he was told not to quibble but sign. Two copies of the signed letter were then sent to the MP. Why? So that the MP could forward it to the consituent with a brief covering letter. Nothing has changed has it!

 

The only was to be effective is for every CAGer to write to their MP and then add a multiplier effect by writing directly to the Secretary of State, the Under sercretary, the Queen, the Prime Minister, the government department itself, your Euro MP, in fact anyone else you care to think about. The letters will all find themselves on the desk of the same official. He will deal with 20 or so letters a day without raising an eyebrow. Give him 20,000 a day and some action may be taken. Otherwise it is simply a waste of time & effort to complain.

 

Well I'll be b......d.

 

You mean 'Private Office' as in now 'Richmond House'???

 

I'll say no more, but I'm getting that "what a small world!!!" feeling. :)

 

The highlighted portion of your last paragraph will seem like overkill to many, but I have stated often enough one must complain to everyone who might listen and might be prepared to do something - even 'St John's Ambulance' if it comes down to it.....

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean 'Private Office' as in now 'Richmond House'???

 

Yes, but before it moved there. I'm very, very old now. Most of the MPs are dead and even the then young political advisers are now 'grandees'.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive any kind of reply? At least an acknowledgement to say they've received your letter. If not, then he's supposed to - I believe MPs are given a very short time limit to respond to initial letters (four days, is it?).

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2c worth.

 

Being a very popular site, I wonder why it is that CAG doesn't organise something along the lines of collecting evidence against specific organisations and then seeking publicity over why the OFT et el are not taking action? Even if the organisors of this site don't have the time, volunteers could be sought - I would be willing.

 

As an individual you can be fobbed off, but with evidence of thousands of abuses, it becomes of interest to the media. To my mind the gov organisations who are supposed to be regulating these organisations are the ones we should be attacking...

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2c worth.

 

Being a very popular site, I wonder why it is that CAG doesn't organise something along the lines of collecting evidence against specific organisations and then seeking publicity over why the OFT et el are not taking action? Even if the organisors of this site don't have the time, volunteers could be sought - I would be willing.

 

As an individual you can be fobbed off, but with evidence of thousands of abuses, it becomes of interest to the media. To my mind the gov organisations who are supposed to be regulating these organisations are the ones we should be attacking...

 

I would be up for that .... don't work, eBay is crap, plenty of time to spare nowadays ... not even getting DCA letters to fend off anymore:D

 

Boa ...

 

Oh, while we are at it, I can't even get responses to some of my recent posts on this site ....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/124878-abbey-wescot-4.html

It's difficult to remember that when you're up to your arse in crocodiles your objective was to drain the swamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps we need a specific thread which brings together all of IJ's misdemeanours then when it's about 100 pages long we can send it to the Minister..............& tell him to chew on that

 

 

Theres nothing to stop someone starting one

 

 

And Boa....I think you will find there has been a response to the post you speak of. :)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Ive just read the whole of this thread trying to work out what it was that was on Youtube. I am at work at the moment, Youtube is a blocked site so I cannot get on.

 

Could someone please give me a synopsis of the audio file?

 

Many thanks

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love a synopsis too please because until I visit a friend's house I can't listen to audios.. For some reason my computer's completely silent.

I've just been reading all this thread and am keen to join in with the fight back.

As far as deciding who to vote for at the next election, I think the only hope is for independent candidates to stand in each constituency. I don't think swapping one corrupt political party for another is ever going to get us anywhere but deeper in the mire.

Patma

Link to post
Share on other sites

fab find, i like the voice and the true grit within the voice and the actual explanation that its all "" silly"" but you know the actual word im referring to once you hear the audio LOL

 

its made my day, thanks so much just send my cca yest - see my mbna thread

 

have a good day its been fun so far ciao MAZ

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...