Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 998 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not that it should be any surprise as its been stated for over two years, but here is what the US lobbyers are pressing for in any US/UK 'deal

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/what-us-lobbyists-want-donald-trump-to-get-from-the-uk-in-a-post-brexit-trade-deal_uk_5c5b26c6e4b00187b5579f64?utm_hp_ref=uk-homepage

 

"Powerful lobbyists are pressing Donald Trump to play hard ball over the NHS, food quality and consumer rights during talks for a US-UK trade deal, it can be revealed."

 

 

Lobbyists for big firms made more than 130 demands, which include:

 

  • Changing how NHS chiefs buy drugs to suit big US pharmaceutical companies
  • Britain scraps its safety-first approach to safety and food standards
  • Law changes that would allow foreign companies to sue the British state
  • Removal of protections for traditional British products

examples

 

[h=2]1) Scrap the safety-first approach to food quality and standards[/h]

[h=2]2) Weaken data protection for consumers[/h]

[h=2]3) Allow the sale of hormone-riddled beef[/h]

[h=2]4) Slash British cattle farming subsidies[/h]

[h=2]5) Allow new genetically-modified foods to be sold with minimal regulation[/h]

[h=2]6) Stop people knowing what they’re eating is genetically-modified food[/h]

[h=2]7) Get rid of Britain’s safety-first approach to chemicals[/h]

 

[h=2]10) Ignore the presence hormones and pus in dairy products[/h]

[h=2]12) Allow politicians, not courts, to handle legal disputes[/h]

[h=2]13) Allow foreign businesses to sue the British state[/h]

[h=2]14) Stop Britain holding big social media companies to account[/h]

[h=2]16) Lift the UK ban on a growth hormone in pork[/h]

[h=2]17) More antibiotics in livestock[/h]

[h=2]18) Eliminate UK testing for a parasitic worm in pork[/h]

[h=2]19) Dump law against chlorine-bleached chicken[/h]

[h=2]20) Legalise dangerous pesticides[/h]

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I agree, Jase. Rees Mogg has pretty much relocated to Dublin as I understand it. His company stands to make a lot of money if the pound plummets. Conflict of interest anyone? He isn't the only one.

 

 

Politicians are only in it for one thing - themselves. The only thing they ever did wrong over the expenses scandal was to have been caught at it. I'm still waiting for my MP to ask my opinions on it all - I forgot that since the one and only time he called he has never been back since as he didn't like what he was told.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this business has shown me one thing and that is the contempt the MPs have for all the electorate. If it wasn't for the fact it would make no difference where I live I would never vote again.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Petition: Revoke Art.50 if there is no Brexit plan by the 25 of February

 

On the 25th of November both the UK Government and the European Union came to an agreement on the proposed departure from the EU. After an historic defeat in the House of Commons on the 15th of January, 2019 by a majority of 230 votes the PM has now decided to go back to the EU over the backstop.

 

More details Under section 5 (ii) of the Belfast argeement, 1998, there is agreement to " to use best endeavours to reach agreement on the adoption of common policies, in areas where there is a mutual cross-border and allisland benefit"

The Government's own economic analysis published in November 2018, shows that a no deal scenario will have roughly a 10% decrease in GDP.

The issue is that EU have firmly stated that they will not re-open negotiations with the UK over the agreement and remove the backstop.

 

 

 

 

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/239706

 

 

15000 votes and counting

 

LET MAY AND CORBYN KNOW RUNNING OUT THE CLOCK IS NOT ACCEPTABLE

  • Haha 1

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they may struggle with that. If they'd asked for article 50 to be extended they might have got a better response.

 

But it's about time May did something instead of olympic standard can kicking. Even 25th February only allows just over a month.

 

I think as it seems most likely that May and Corbyn ARE just running out the clock:

 

An extension requires the OK of the EU 27, and they have said that there must be a good reason with a plan, so all May would have to do is carry on waffling and they wouldn't grant it

result - crash out

 

Whats currently expected is that May, with the underhand support of Corbyn, is just going to drag out the 'meaningful vote' until a few days before exit day, with the ONLY options being her deal or no deal.

Corbyn will almost certainly enable this.

 

Hence the Petition

 

So default is stay - which leaves ALL options open

NOT crash out which leaves NO options or an already heavily rejected deal which IS pretty much the worst option.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see if the percentages of the original vote changes. You would need the whole of the electorate of the UK to be aware of the petition and add themselves to the petition if they agreed with the statement, which would show the mood of the electorate. On reaching 100k it will be interesting to see what happens next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theresa May does seem to be running down the clock, so she can force MP's to accept her deal, to avoid a no deal Brexit.

 

I think MP's including current cabinet ministers could stop May doing this and she will be forced to delay Brexit, while Parliament has a chance to decide the way forward.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ERG's issues with the safety net/backstop is that clearly they clearly dont believe a technological solution is implementable - they are fighting it as hard as they can

- despite them saying that was an easy solution to something that wasn't really a problem .....

Why are they NOT supporting THEIR proposal?

 

So if the ERG dont believe it can or will be done when they are the ones driving the UK parliament, why should anyone else

 

The EU's stance will be

'Implement the technological alternative to the safety net as you say is the alternative, and the net is not needed.

A little more perhaps than using motorways as lorry parks, and giving money to ferry firms with no ferries.

Simples ...

 

 

 

Of course, the ERG/hard right are the ones driving the 'keep bluffing - everyone will fold' stance, despite them holding just a pair of number two's in their hand. - because dragging it out means they win. Hard brexit + repeal of rights and protections.

- May is calling their bluff.

 

... Trouble is May is also just holding a pair of number two's,

and the biggest of her number twos is Corbyn - who also happens to be one of the ERG's big number twos

 

 

Without Corbyn, both the ERG and May would have nothing.

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the UK failing to even keep the trade deals we get through the EU

 

 

fuax fooked.jpg

 

You can imagine

 

Faux: We want cake

 

Japanese Negotiator:

Double darn

They insult me by sending this idiot

and If i don't go back with the deal of the century for us after negotiating with this fool, my family name will become part of our language used to describe stupid incompetents who cant win a negotiation against children

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

So as May is defeated again

As is a delay amendment ...

 

Corbyn shouts

 

'When will the PM listen to Parliament'

.. while ignoring the wishes of his own membership, momentum and Mp's

 

and

 

'She has no plan'

.. while he effectively has the same, simply renaming the May non plan to Corbyns non plan

 

 

 

 

While Elon Musk Company OpenAI reports:

"Brexit has already cost the UK economy at least 80bn since the EU referendum"

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought this may be of interest.

This is a piece written by Frederick Forsyth!

Some people have very strange hobbies and a mate of mine has steeped

himself so long and so intently in a life long study of the British constitution

that he leaves professors of government scratching their heads before

admitting he is right after all.

 

It is fashionable to say we Brits have no constitution but that is rubbish.

Also rubbish to claim we have no written constitution. It is part-written,

part unspoken custom. But there is nothing unwritten about the English

Bill of Rights of 1689.

 

What IS true is that, unlike all others, ours was not written in one

place at one time by one group of scholars and stored in one place. But it

is still there. he says My mate claims that with all their powers there are two

things our parliament cannot do. It cannot legally disempower itself and it

cannot require our monarch to break her Coronation Oath.

 

“this is the most interesting part” He then goes on to affirm that the

passing and ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon did both that and is therefore

invalid. He says this is being taken extremely seriously in very high places.

 

Now supposing he is right? It would make Brexit not a Brexit but a breakfast-a

dog’s breakfast. It would mean our politicos passed all those sovereign powers

from London to Brussels illegally. In which case there is nothing to discuss.

 

We walk without any more need-bending and trade with the rest of the world

on the best terms we can get.

“Whoopee”

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FlyBMI have just released a press release they have gone into administration and all flights cancelled

 

"The airline has faced several difficulties, including recent spikes in fuel and carbon costs, the latter arising from the EU’s recent decision to exclude UK airlines from full participation in the Emissions Trading Scheme.

 

"These issues have undermined efforts to move the airline into profit.

 

"Current trading and future prospects have also been seriously affected by the uncertainty created by the Brexit process, which has led to our inability to secure valuable flying contracts in Europe and lack of confidence around bmi’s ability to continue flying between destinations in Europe.

 

Might shake up Parliament a bit now reality starts to bite

Link to post
Share on other sites

Corbyn gets his collar felt by the party at long last and gets a (hopefully final) written warning

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-brexit-policy-jeremy-corbyn-party-members-nec-remain-no-deal-second-referendum-a8781191.html

 

 

“You were elected leader of our party on a platform of transforming Labour into a member led movement. You said that ‘policy will be made by Labour members, not the leader, shadow cabinet or parliamentary party."

 

 

“Based on the content of your letter to the prime minister, not only is the policy not now being followed, it has clearly been changed – but without any mandate from the party membership to do so. How is this ‘Straight Talking, Honest Politics’?”

 

 

"The vast majority of the membership want a referendum on the deal. If we are truly a member led party, then all elements of the Brexit policy must be adhered to."

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Corbyn gets his collar felt by the party at long last and gets a (hopefully final) written warning

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-brexit-policy-jeremy-corbyn-party-members-nec-remain-no-deal-second-referendum-a8781191.html

 

 

“You were elected leader of our party on a platform of transforming Labour into a member led movement. You said that ‘policy will be made by Labour members, not the leader, shadow cabinet or parliamentary party."

 

Forget party policy and Party decisions, swear allegiance to Der Leader and whatever HE wants

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-second-referendum-labour-back-john-mcdonnell-a8783271.html

 

Brexit: Labour will only back a fresh referendum ‘in extremis’, John McDonnell says

 

 

https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/news/scotland/labour-mp-says-he-wont-sign-ridiculous-loyalty-pledge/

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/labour-loyalty-pledge_uk_5c69b697e4b033a79943aa3f?utm_hp_ref=uk-homepage

"I pledge to work for the achievement of a Labour led Government under whatever leadership members elect. And I accept a Labour led government is infinitely better than any other election outcome.”

 

See any similarities: (including institutionalised anti-semitism (for starters))

"I vow to you, Jeremy Corbyn, as Leader of the Party, loyalty and bravery. I vow to you and to the leaders that you set for me, absolute allegiance"

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

and Corbyn has the gall to say the 7 were 'elected to carry out labour manifesto when he is deliberately confounding the stated will of the Party

 

Well Corbyn, they have left to attempt to deliver the Labour manifesto and attempt to deliver on the will of the majority of the Party.

 

 

Corbyn is unquestionably the worst thing to ever happen to the Labour Party. They would be in power now if it wasn't for Corbyn and his Cronies.

 

I hope the Unite members at the Honda and Nissan (and Toyota) plants are demanding Mcclucksky's head on a plate for his machinations.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

The government have responded to the petition asking to revoke Article 50.

 

'The Government’s policy is not to revoke Article 50. Instead, we continue to work with Parliament to deliver a deal that ensures we leave the European Union, as planned, on March 29th.'

 

They're considering it for debate which is all the have to do once a petition is over 100,000 signatures. This one has 129,000 and is still open.

 

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/239706

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame the car workers can't just move abroad with the manufacturers and Financiers

 

To add to the collapse of the remnants of the UK manufacturing base

 

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu/aviva-natwest-to-join-brexodus-of-business-to-eu-idUKKCN1Q81YW

 

£800 Billion+ 'Brexodus' of Assets to EU

 

 

 

 

"Among banks, Britain’s Barclays secured court approval last month to move 190 billion euros (£166 billion) in assets to a Dublin subsidiary."

 

 

Not included yet:

"Most of the largest international banks are keeping their asset and capital transfer plans confidential"

 

"Lloyd’s of London, the world’s oldest commercial insurance market, looks set to be among the last and probably the biggest of all, saying it won’t complete its coordination of Part VII transfers on behalf of its syndicates until the end of 2020."

 

 

 

"the quiet shift of money means less business will be processed in Britain and less tax will be raised by the country’s financial sector, currently the biggest source of corporate tax revenue."

 

 

 

 

BUT already included:

"Jacob Rees-Mogg’s group launches second Irish fund"

 

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/financial-services/jacob-rees-mogg-s-group-launches-second-irish-fund-1.3573675

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-jacob-rees-mogg-scm-ireland-city-move-eu-withdrawal-dublin-a8398041.html

 

"The fund also warned its clients directly of the dangers of a hard Brexit, saying it would “increase costs” and make it difficult to pursue its objectives."

 

 

 

They may be divided in Parliament, but they certainly seem united in taking their assets out of Brexit Britain,

especially arch Brexiters like Rees Mogg and Dyson.

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 998 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...