Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Smart meters: the hidden agenda


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3073 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Energy giants are set to use digital smart meters as a way to double the cost of power when families need it most — adding nearly £60 a year to the average bill.

 

A Money Mail investigation has discovered Britain’s leading power firms are expected to introduce tariffs that charge more at peak times when they roll out new electronic meters which monitor how much energy you use by the second.

 

It means electricity and gas used in the evenings could cost 99 per cent more than at other times — penalising everyone cooking family meals, watching popular TV shows and heating their homes on chilly winter evenings.

 

Higher charges will also apply in the morning when people are most likely to be taking baths and showers and having the central heating on.

 

Money Mail has discovered that British Gas has already trialled a tariff that charges more at peak times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not surprise me in the slightest, plus they will be able to control who can use what energy and when, so if say, London needs more energy to keep their lights on, then they will be able to close down other parts of the country to supply the demand elsewhere, blackouts will become the norm.

 

There is always a hidden agenda when it comes to things like this, they make it sound like its a good idea and will be something we want, but in reality, it only ever suits them and their needs.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not surprise me in the slightest, plus they will be able to control who can use what energy and when, so if say, London needs more energy to keep their lights on, then they will be able to close down other parts of the country to supply the demand elsewhere, blackouts will become the norm.

 

There is always a hidden agenda when it comes to things like this, they make it sound like its a good idea and will be something we want, but in reality, it only ever suits them and their needs.

 

This sounds just a little bit paranoid really...

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds just a little bit paranoid really...

 

To the uninitiated maybe, akin to allowing ''refugees'' into Europe, there is always a hidden agenda unfortunately.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They already have such schemes for businesses that use large amounts of electricity, but I don't think it is right to push it onto households as they have no other options for their supply.

Edited by lostinmusic
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds just a little bit paranoid really...

 

Not the case, the poster is correct, not to mention the dangers of microwave transmission in your house.

In Australia they have had them for a while and certain goods have to be fitted with circuits that allow smart meters to interact with them, one result was to remotely shut down peoples air conditioning in the height of summer to fit the power companies budgets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?408980-How-To-Decline-A-Smart-Meter

 

 

I started a thread some time ago on how to decline a SMART meter. We are legally within our rights to say no to this.

 

 

'Stop Smart metres' is a handy website with a template on it to help people. There has been widespread bullying of customers trying to refuse these although this did not happen to me personally, thankfully. (so far).

 

 

The thread includes a youtube clip of a man with the police around with a warrant, breaking in to forcibly install a smart metre into his house without his permission.

 

 

Nationwide gumtree adverts specifically aimed at ex-army to apply to train to become smart meter installers.

 

 

And links to an interesting film 'Take back your power'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you already get a lower voltage as the result of demand, dropped from 240v to 220v and also there has been a change to what voltage drop triggers a compensation scheme to kick in. How many people monitor their supply voltage in the first place I wonder?

The govenrment has made it clear it want the energy companies to drop the voltage and shut down the supply to individuals at times of peak demand. What bbusiness is it of the government to decide what I spend my money on at a given time of day and what if my high demand is due to running a dialysis machine and an iron lung and not loads of compuer stuff? Do I have to tell them beforehand that granny needs these or just send them the coroner's report afterwards?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the voltage lowers you need more current to use the same power i.e Volts X Amps 250 volts times 4 amps for an Hour = 1 Kwhr 220 volts times 4 amps for an hour = 0.88 Kwhr

Living in the wild windy west of Ireland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmnn I wonder if these big businesses will be paying at any peak rate times...lets face it many of them already get a discount as they use so much...they should be paying more, perhaps a sliding scale lie tax would be better I:e you pay a very small charge for the first 2000 kilowatt hours, then the next 1000 kilowatt hours you pay more anon anon anon....that would be a more productive way of encouraging savings as well as helping the less well off as the basic cost should be lower than it is now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insane that they claim this will make people use less electricity by charging more at peak times.

 

Also how can you legally stop them installing new smart meters? They'll just do it by force and say "gubment said so" like the plastic bags with a big smile on their face.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insane that they claim this will make people use less electricity by charging more at peak times.

 

Also how can you legally stop them installing new smart meters? They'll just do it by force and say "gubment said so" like the plastic bags with a big smile on their face.

 

 

Just in case you missed it, here is a thread I prepared earlier on 'How..'

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?408980-How-To-Decline-A-Smart-Meter&highlight=clear33

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...