Jump to content

Michael Browne

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    14,972
  • Avg. Content Per Day

    3.1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

Michael Browne last won the day on March 23 2018

Michael Browne had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5,814 Excellent

About Michael Browne

  • Rank
    Royalties Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The CPZ restriction times apply to SYL's within that zone and not parking bays, so SYL's do not require their own timeplates. Each parking bay within the zone must have it's own timeplate, even if, as is often the case, the restricted times are the same as the CPZtimes
  2. Having made an informal challenge and been refused, he has 2 choices - pay the discount or wait for the NtO and make formal representations on the grounds of missing/inadequate signage at which point the full penaltyof £130 is in play. The council will almost certainly refuse it. He can then appeal to an adjudicator where if it becomes apparent that he is a resident in the adjoining CPZ and is refusing to buy a resident permit on principle, but is knowingly parking in contravention somewhere else, even with the missing sign I can quite easily see an adjudicator refusing an appeal. If he continues to park there, he's likely to get more pcns, which will end up costing more than £120 a year. But it's his principle and his money. How did the last PCN end up?
  3. Thereis a missing sign : https://goo.gl/maps/j8zgZ6yxujuB6S3o7 although there is a sign round the corner: https://goo.gl/maps/DoUVK3DXMRQ2HU3H7 If your father lives in the area he must be aware of the CPZ and it's restrictions, why does he noot have a resident permit?
  4. Except bottom right 'You are appealing against the offence' , Ground 2: 'Another driver was using the vehicle at the time of the offence' , implies you can transfer liability (at least initially)
  5. I would think that the wording of the original agreement will be crucial and whether it says anything about what happens if you withdraw your consent. After 15 years do you or any of your neighbours still have a copy?
  6. Sadly I think an adjudicator would say that teh no entry was clearly and sufficiently signed. Everything else you say is merely mitigaton and adjudicators generally cannot take mitigation into account. Ironically either of the other two options would not have resulted in a pcn. Discount looks the best coiurse.
  7. It's likely that the CPZ is meant to run from the end of the red route as shown in GSV in 2009 https://goo.gl/maps/T3S4hhop1X72 but by 2012 that sign has disappeared and been replaced by one in the current position https://goo.gl/maps/eFvJhaF5mMH2 which effectively leaves the SYL in no-mans-land without timeplate and not covered by a CPZ
  8. If that were the case the reverse of the CPZ entry sign would also be an entry sign. It's not: https://goo.gl/maps/BFcq3SqFruB2 If you cross Brixton Hill the next CPZ starts at the end on the red route lines in Brixton Water Lane.
  9. I agree, there should be a timeplate for the SYL. It's doubtful that Lambeth will agree, so you need to be prepared to go to adjudication
  10. This topic was closed on 10 March 2019. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  11. This topic was closed on 09 March 2019. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  12. The debt won''t be registered with TEC until the councl send you the Order for Recovery, At that point you can make a witness statement to TEC that you didn't receive the PCN . The OfR will have details of how to do this.
  13. As long as the drveway is not a shared drive way the following exemption applies:
  14. 1. Yes, normally with a notice of the Traffic Regulation Order in the local paper 2. No DYL's are 24/7 so no sign needed 3. In theory yes, in practice no 4. The TRO should mention the length of the lines
×
×
  • Create New...