Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DEBT Collection Agency of the YEAR Awards


andrew1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6017 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Am boycotting..will make their lives miserable as they did to me as a student.

 

Had the unfortunate luck of dealing with Wescott they reduced me to tears, threatened me on the phone annnnnnd had the gall to lie and say they had made a doorstep visit when I was blatantly at home! :o

 

I cannot believe they 'award' for making people totally miserable. Hell hath no fury like a graduate with a crud credit rating! :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 470
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I cannot believe they 'award' for making people totally miserable. Hell hath no fury like a graduate with a crud credit rating! :mad:
Especially one with a degree in computing and moves in hacking circles:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no reply to my email to the bloke at CCS, shows how little he thinks of our thoughts... or maybe he is on holiday....

 

I still maintain that instead of sending a DCA a CCA (which almost admits that you owe money) ask them for a copy of the last bill from their clients - much the simplest way of confusing the poor dears. State that without a proper itemised bill you can't reconcile your own accounts and that way if they provide a bill you haven't paid - you pay.

 

I still think also that if they had to send out the last bill received from their clients it would stop them chasing statute barred debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sillygirl slight dissagee wit that

I still maintain that instead of sending a DCA a CCA (which almost admits that you owe money) ask them for a copy of the last bill from their clients - much the simplest way of confusing the poor dears. State that without a proper itemised bill you can't reconcile your own accounts and that way if they provide a bill you haven't paid - you pay.

 

you make it sound like we trying to avoid paying, when all we are doing is checking the validity of the debt with the DCA. we are legally entitled to ask for CCA especialy if it headed "I do not acknoledge this debt"

I hate people who are trying to avoid paying what they owe.

 

besides the thing we do like is to create havock with them. it keeps us amused and makes us look forward to our postman comming to our door instead of hiding

If my advice has been helpful please feel free to click on my scales :grin:

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner (CCA request letter N)and other templates)

 

Debt Collection Agencies & Statutory Demands, a few strategies

 

Abbey charges, Won

B-card non-disclosure of S.A.R, WON £30 costs awarded

B-Card, court for harrasement, failed to defend WON £175 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/125554-28-days-later-no.html#post1422508

B-Card charges, partial refund, still fighting

Vanquis-Cabot, GIVEN UP :lol:

HFC & my mum, no brainer, no CCA http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/133330-hfc-my-mum.html#post1404514

 

PLEASE donate to CAG however small. They are fighting for YOUR rights as a consumer. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/

Link to post
Share on other sites

sillygirl slight dissagee wit that

I still maintain that instead of sending a DCA a CCA (which almost admits that you owe money) ask them for a copy of the last bill from their clients - much the simplest way of confusing the poor dears. State that without a proper itemised bill you can't reconcile your own accounts and that way if they provide a bill you haven't paid - you pay.

 

you make it sound like we trying to avoid paying, when all we are doing is checking the validity of the debt with the DCA. we are legally entitled to ask for CCA especialy if it headed "I do not acknoledge this debt"

I hate people who are trying to avoid paying what they owe.

 

besides the thing we do like is to create havock with them. it keeps us amused and makes us look forward to our postman comming to our door instead of hiding

The CCA if such exists proves or disproves the existance of an alleged debt. Asking for it is not an admission of a debt but no more than you would ask anyone who claims you owe them money.

 

If a DCA can produce proof of the existance of a debt and their right to collect it then I would not have a problem with paying. They should have this proof readily to hand before they start their NASTY BULLYING PHONE CALLS AND COMPUTER GENERATED THREATOGRAMS. Look at over 90% of the cases on here when the DCA **** are asked for a CCA they cannot produce one yet continue to threaten all sorts of hellfire and damnation. They should realise that they CANNOT demand money without proof. The same goes for the bottom feeders who demand money for debts which are statute barred, They had six years to provide proof and failed to do so. Tough sh!t.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mrmarmite

Not all debts are covered by CCA's, for instance utility companies, ie Thames Water and British Gas and BT... this method works very well for them - I was billed twice by Thames Water for the same year recently....

 

This again creates havoc as they are almost always now expecting a CCA - a different request to what they are being 'programmed' to receive is much better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yup ok fair enough, soz i didnt take into account the utilities and mobile/BT. habbit i spose

If my advice has been helpful please feel free to click on my scales :grin:

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner (CCA request letter N)and other templates)

 

Debt Collection Agencies & Statutory Demands, a few strategies

 

Abbey charges, Won

B-card non-disclosure of S.A.R, WON £30 costs awarded

B-Card, court for harrasement, failed to defend WON £175 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/125554-28-days-later-no.html#post1422508

B-Card charges, partial refund, still fighting

Vanquis-Cabot, GIVEN UP :lol:

HFC & my mum, no brainer, no CCA http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/133330-hfc-my-mum.html#post1404514

 

PLEASE donate to CAG however small. They are fighting for YOUR rights as a consumer. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/

Link to post
Share on other sites

sillygirl slight dissagee wit that

I still maintain that instead of sending a DCA a CCA (which almost admits that you owe money) ask them for a copy of the last bill from their clients - much the simplest way of confusing the poor dears. State that without a proper itemised bill you can't reconcile your own accounts and that way if they provide a bill you haven't paid - you pay.

 

you make it sound like we trying to avoid paying, when all we are doing is checking the validity of the debt with the DCA. we are legally entitled to ask for CCA especialy if it headed "I do not acknoledge this debt"

I hate people who are trying to avoid paying what they owe.

 

besides the thing we do like is to create havock with them. it keeps us amused and makes us look forward to our postman comming to our door instead of hiding

 

 

I hate people who are trying to avoid paying what they owe.

 

 

Well said Mr Marmite ( like Vegimite myself :D ) this whole site is dedicated to helping people establish the validity of debts being collected and to making sure the companies are doing what they should in law. No point in coming down to their levels and breaking the laws. I'm sure Sillygirl doesn't mean what you say though. If you see her other postings she's far from a 'dodger' ;) she's lubly and supportive of what we are doing, but it doesn't go amiss sometimes to reafirm what we are all doing.

 

Sarah.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from that site: "Registry Trust Limited is a not for profit company"

 

Accounts are a little behind for sure but for the year to Dec 04

 

Turnover £2.141 million

 

Gross Profit £1.883 million

 

Wages, salaries and Directors emoluments £1.004 million

 

Retained Profits £128,660

 

Ah, thats why they are a not for profit organisation, the directors and staff take it all !

Am I being a bit thick here or does this mean that they keep nearly 90% of the money paid by people and only 12% goes to paying off their debts?

 

Grumpy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I being a bit thick here or does this mean that they keep nearly 90% of the money paid by people and only 12% goes to paying off their debts?

 

Grumpy

 

Somebody once said,

 

"To be truly successful in life you need just three things, a good doctor, a forgiving priest, and a very clever accountant."

 

Seems to be truer nowadays than ever before.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Registry Trust has NOTHING to do with paying debts :confused:

 

It is the register of court fines and judgments.

 

 

The Chairman of Registry Trust is also none other than Malcolm Hurlston, big cheese at the CCCS. I'm assuming they are the same person. Look who else is in the gang and the organisations they represent.

 

It's comparable to Shipman having his own Funeral Directors. Not illegal,...... but is it really a good idea???

 

Would it fill you with confidence???

 

..and why does he say there is no room for Credit Unions in todays Britain??? Is it because they are run by it's members have 'too much' privacy??

 

 

He's sure to be along in a minute ...........;)

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't find it just now but

 

House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 30 Apr 1996 (pt 24)

 

Questions were being asked sometime ago, and ironically, a certain politician is/was on the board of certain DCA..........

 

 

 

 

 

Am I the only one who remebers all this??

 

Hold on another one to find..............

 

Try 25 in this thread.........before MI5 get hold of me......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/73108-1st-credit-noting-contents-2.html?highlight=milburn

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't find it just now but

 

House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 30 Apr 1996 (pt 24)

 

Questions were being asked sometime ago, and ironically, a certain politician is/was on the board of certain DCA..........

 

 

 

 

 

Am I the only one who remebers all this??

 

Hold on another one to find..............

 

Try 25 in this thread.........before MI5 get hold of me......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/73108-1st-credit-noting-contents-2.html?highlight=milburn

 

 

 

We in the Fan Club had seen this, but which Agency are we speaking of Danny? Sorry Danny, Got it thank you... 1st Credit..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Chairman of Registry Trust is also none other than Malcolm Hurlston, big cheese at the CCCS. I'm assuming they are the same person. Look who else is in the gang and the organisations they represent.

 

 

yeah i clocked that. I thoguth a few folks on here had their wires corssed with regards to what RT actually do, may infact, it was I with my own wires crossed haha.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....and the US based company who's link is provided earlier (not paying UK tax) is targeting CCCS customers.

 

Something just isn't right, but I'll let you draw your own conclusions or perhaps someone 'on the inside' would be willing to explain exactly what is going on??? I know these people and organisations should always be approached with caution as things may not be as they seem. Nothing in life is free, especially if there's money to be made and/or information to gain. Who can you trust?? CT may actually have shot themselves in the foot with these awards.......

 

And now to announce the launch of my new online "Dannyboy Financial Magazine" :shock::p :p

 

 

 

 

Sosumi,

 

Thank you for your concern. They haven't got me yet, but it's a bit awkward typing this from the bottom drawer of a filing cabinet, and I can't see the screen from here..

 

Has Mr Bond left the building yet????? :cool:

 

 

 

 

 

No wait.....that makes me the baddie...:shock::oops:

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like it

If my advice has been helpful please feel free to click on my scales :grin:

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner (CCA request letter N)and other templates)

 

Debt Collection Agencies & Statutory Demands, a few strategies

 

Abbey charges, Won

B-card non-disclosure of S.A.R, WON £30 costs awarded

B-Card, court for harrasement, failed to defend WON £175 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/125554-28-days-later-no.html#post1422508

B-Card charges, partial refund, still fighting

Vanquis-Cabot, GIVEN UP :lol:

HFC & my mum, no brainer, no CCA http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/133330-hfc-my-mum.html#post1404514

 

PLEASE donate to CAG however small. They are fighting for YOUR rights as a consumer. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Danny,

 

Is this why you've edited so many of your threads on this particular thread ?

 

 

errmm.....unfortunately, it's nothing more than the fact I sometimes wander into the forums after a few drinks and then I'm reluctant to say what I want to say.....and end up posting complete nonsense:oops: .

I remove them to stop distracting people from the serious point the thread is actually making.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...