1970 vc Cabot YES, THEY ARE TAKING ME TO COURT

[andrew1]

Kings Hill (No1) and they are trying to obtain a Final charge order (See my thread)

 

Hi Sailor21, I have just run through your thread, maybe we should continue over there, I see you have had Seahorse and Elizabeth and a couple of others helping you along,They know what they are talking about re Cabot believe me, but Cabot are a world unto themselves and you need to pick your way through them carefully. We all in the Cabot Fan Club have been stripping their empire apart to get to the bottom of what they are up to. so hang on. Kingshill No1 Ltd IS now a Dormant company but it wasn't up until 15th January 2007 when it swapped names with Cabot Financial (UK)Ltd. It makes a big difference to court paperwork as to what names they are using and who is presenting what - I'm not surprised the Hodsons fool ran out of the court as he did - probably knows when his lucks run out. I'd suggest we keep posting on your thread and follow this through. You're right, Tomterm is great with the court / legal bits so we'll get him tagged too. Just read through those documents of yours and get the companies sorted out as to who is doing what and post it back here so we can talk you through it. Anything we feel sensitive or best kept quiet we'll PM you. You must be prepared fully for this and Cabot are a general mess when it comes to these things, so we must get it right.

[tomterm8]

tt8 Can you tell me where in the act it states that only an owner or creditor can take legal action as I currently have Kings Hill (supposedly dormant) on my back reguarding a debt belonging to and being paid to, Cabot? :x

 

see my thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/98966-people-who-have-right.html

 

also s141 of the cca 1974.

 

 

 

"I am aware that a separate company of the same group operates under the name of Kings Hill No 1 Ltd."

tt8 can you say this when they are "dormant"

 

Yes, legally, all companies must operate to some extent, even if they are not trading (for example, they must have directors, have a registered address etc).

 

andrew is the perfect person to explain the intricacies of the cabot name game, he's been at it alot longer than me, (plus, I've got a medical condition that is limiting my online time to about 15 minutes a day at the moment)

[1970]

Hi Andrew1, in answer to your post #120 - what did I write to them..

 

I copied tomterm8's post #111

 

Cheers,

1970.

[1970]

GOOD NEWS:

 

I just rang the court as it has been 7 days since my response to the substituted particulars of claim was sent to the court.

 

The clerk informed me that an order from the district judge has been posted to me today.

 

The judge has ordered upon reviewing the substituted particulars that the claim is struck out!

 

I shall post the exact wording of the order once I have it in hand.

 

May I take this opportunity to say thank you to tomterm8 for his excellence.

 

I am sure the fuin has only just begun as I shall now proceed to the next stage and have Cabot clean up my credit file for me.

 

Cheers from a very happy 1970.

[pmhcfc]

GOOD NEWS:

 

I just rang the court as it has been 7 days since my response to the substituted particulars of claim was sent to the court.

 

The clerk informed me that an order from the district judge has been posted to me today.

 

The judge has ordered upon reviewing the substituted particulars that the claim is struck out!

 

I shall post the exact wording of the order once I have it in hand.

 

May I take this opportunity to say thank you to tomterm8 for his excellence.

 

I am sure the fuin has only just begun as I shall now proceed to the next stage and have Cabot clean up my credit file for me.

 

Cheers from a very happy 1970.

 

THis is just the beginning

;-)

 

Well done all concerned !

[patrickq1]

very good thread simplified by tt8 and andrew1 gladens the heart when we can see everyone pulling together and getting true meanings to the law

well done

[andrew1]

very good thread simplified by tt8 and andrew1 gladens the heart when we can see everyone pulling together and getting true meanings to the law

well done

 

It's the Synergy that makes this forum what it is. There is not going to be a hair unturned in Cabot that we are not going to expose. It's like peeling an orange, piece by piece they are becoming more and more stripped and once we have the whole skin off we are gonna EAT the feckers for breakfast.

[djdave]

Excellent news re the case being struck out. I'm almost hoping Cabot will take me to court, just for the fun of it! Bring it on, Ken....

[MoonHawk]

Well done. And Well done all concerned who helped, especaolly tomterm8.

 

Best Wishes

MoonHawk

[Jeff2000]

GOOD NEWS:

 

I just rang the court as it has been 7 days since my response to the substituted particulars of claim was sent to the court.

 

The clerk informed me that an order from the district judge has been posted to me today.

 

The judge has ordered upon reviewing the substituted particulars that the claim is struck out!

 

I shall post the exact wording of the order once I have it in hand.

 

May I take this opportunity to say thank you to tomterm8 for his excellence.

 

I am sure the fuin has only just begun as I shall now proceed to the next stage and have Cabot clean up my credit file for me.

 

Cheers from a very happy 1970.

 

 

Hi 1970,

 

 

Well done!

 

It will be very interesting to see what the judge had to say. This could be a big help to others in a similar situation.

 

 

Best wishes, Jeff.

[tomterm8]

Cool... and now I'm feeling smug, LOL:)

[diskmandave]

Another brilliant result!!

 

Well done indeed, that's two today!!!

 

Great stuff from tomterm8 as usual too!

 

Some balloons are needed

 

 

Congratulations!

[MARTIN3030]

Great news.

Let this be a lesson to Mr.Maynard,though I am not holding my breath.

[itsamomentintime]

The judge has ordered upon reviewing the substituted particulars that the claim is struck out!

 

 

so it begins!!!

[Having_A_Knightmare]

Well Done1970

 

Another Result for CAGers

[Rhia]

Well done indeed, that's two today!!!

 

 

Who's the second one?

[andrew1]

Lets have the full details of why it was struck out and I can include it in Ken Maynards Birthday card - 10th September if anyone fancies sending him a card!

 

That picture above looks like a good cover picture too !

[Newborn]

Thank you to everyone for a very, very helpful stack of info. I have been following the company name thread with some interest and have also had a look at Companies House.

I have also asked Companies House to clarify the position with regard to these entries. I appears to me that the whole idea here is to cloud issues and to hide the person/company to whom you should really be asking the questions of. At the moment it appears that if you want information from CF UK or KH No1, the answer is that it holds no data on you (of course it doesn’t, they’re referring to the dormant company!) That another active company of the same name(s) exists is neither here nor there to these people!

What if everyone wrote to the Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd and asked for the name of the company(ies) including addresses and Companies House numbers for all those who now, or in the past have claimed to be the legal owners of the debt(s)?

Anything other than a full and frank response would I think, fall foul of the final 2002 guidance from the OFT regarding clarity etc. Especially as they all rub shoulders and probably share the same canteen!

Comments?

[andrew1]

Hey newborn your'e learning about our little friends. well done, I hope thousands more join you.

 

Every person who finds these things out must continue to report them to Trading Standards, the OFT and the DTI their MP anyone, who can look these guys in the eye and say "Hey Mr MAYNARD IT's ABOUT TIME YOU CHANGED THINGS"

 

We are extending our research into another one of their companies that seem to be buying debt Cabot Financial Group Limited, that's got an interesting accumilation of Directors with some fascinating connections to other companies. They are currently being processed through the Cabot Fan Club mincer and the various parties informed where we think appropriate at the right time.

 

But it is refreshing to see you have done some research, our library is getting quite extensive..

 

Just remind them when you write about being in CAG and the Cabot Fan CLub - they'll know where you're coming from

 

 

Sarah

[Alex2008]

Hi All,

 

Cabot has been sending me letters demanding for payment for a debt they bought from ARG Card. However, I have been ignoring them because:

 

1. This allegged debt is about or over 6/7 years old.

 

2. Since, I have moved addresses several times; it was only about 4 months ego that they (Cabot) have started to claim for the debt.

 

3. they got my name spelling wrongly (I don't want to write or get in touch with them so I have to put this right)

 

The matter is gentlly escalating; I have received a letter from their solicitors (Hodsons). They demanding that I pay them within seven days.

 

I never ackowledged any debt to anyone so far.

 

 

Please, could you help by advising me.

 

 

Thank you,

 

 

Alex

[andrew1]

Alex if you are new then I'd suggest you start your own thread, if you are not sure how to do that take a wander through the FAQ's but it's easy enough on the button top left 'start a new thread' or such like. in this group of threads, then you'll be guided through how to deal with the Hodsons fools and our mateys in the Cabot Towers. Good luck...can't do much for you myself just now too busy on one or two other things, but there are plenty of hardened Cabot lovers who will.

 

 

Sarah