Jump to content

itsamomentintime

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    1,244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

199 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Lowell have discontinued, letter arrived confirming thanks for everyones help, especially dx100uk
  2. Mediation call done, basically they asked for payment via installments, and said the paperwork was on they way. I rejected their request, case going to court
  3. Defence below, currently I have not received any paperwork from Lowells: The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is accepted insofar that a relationship did exist between the Defendant and Sky and BT however, I cannot recall this account (Agreement) and the Claimant has yet to supply me with a copy of the Account/Agreement mentioned in particulars of Claim. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied, the defendant does not recall any breach and again the Claimant has yet to supply me with a copy of the agreement requested through the PAPDC reply form and CPR 31.14. The Defendant denies failing to maintain the required payments to Sky and BT. It is denied that I have failed to respond to demands for payment sent by the claimant and/or its agents. The Claimant is put to strict proof that any such demands have been sent to me by the claimant 3. The defendant did not receive and is unaware of any legal notice of assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to Law and property Act 1925 Section 136(1). a). The Claimant admits it is the assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925. 4. Therefore, the defendant denies owing any money to the Claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof: a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement. b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for. c. That Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated as claimed. 5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of claim. 6. Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract. OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to consider the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.
  4. Credit where credit is due dx, I followed your advice and phoned them, and they informed me that they had written the alleged debt off. Have now received a letter saying the same, which I am passing on to the land registry Thank you for your help
  5. I have a mediation session via phone on friday, 9.30am, has anyone got any experience of such a thing?
  6. Is there anything I can do about it? Isnt 33 days +1 from 29th November = today?
  7. I'll post what I filed tomorrow If xmas counts, then I'm within time, is this correct?
  8. theres been 3 bank holidays, maybe this will help truth is, after the AOS, i was waiting for something in the post to confirm the next steps
  9. No I haven't done anything apart from the acknowledgement of service i think i need to file a defence asap Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio Date of issue – . 29th Nov 2019 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 1. the claim comprises the following agreements the defendant entered into: a BT plc with reference xxx and current balance of xxx b. Sky UK limited with reference xxxx and current balance of xxx the agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained and subsequently assigned to the claimant. What is the total value of the claim? 563.48 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? no When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? no Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? no Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? no Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears” or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? no Why did you cease payments? accounts were closed What was the date of your last payment? 2015 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no
  10. Looks like Lowell have issued a court claim, which I have acknowledged. The mcol website is inviting me to offer a defence, was wondering if you guys could help me with it, or point me in the right direction?
×
×
  • Create New...