Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lease issue. Wife aboandoned and in South America.


Recommended Posts

Hi

My wife owned a limited company and had a commercial lease in one property and took on a second lease with the same landlord for a second property (to downsize and save costs). The second property was taken within the last few months.

I also took on a small unit with the landlord for a new start up.

I have dealt with the landlord at all stages. The leases for the limited company were taken in the name of the limited company but signed by me as representative / employee. No guarantor was given.

My wife decided to leave me and abandon the business and she has returned to South America, with no intention of return. I don't know where as yet.

The landlord has been informed and I have told them that I will pass on a forwarding address in South America when and if I have one.

My home is mortgaged with both her and myself on it. I'm worried about what the landlord can do that will affect me and is there a way to protect myself?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the property you live is still in both names even if he were to get a CCJ in the very worst case then go for a charge on the property it would only be a restriction k , which doesnt need paying nor upon home sale.

not that you need too but id be getting her off the mortgage and the deeds .

then unless a debt is in your name there is nowt much anyone can do.

you indicate a 2nd unit 'for you' or was this the downsize you mention? 

who took out what and when and are you a director too on anything or just signed in your wifes behalf on this ltd co leases

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LeaseDebt said:

My home is mortgaged with both her and myself on it. I'm worried about what the landlord can do that will affect me and is there a way to protect myself?

Are you still able to pay the mortgage on your own? As long as it's still being paid the lender won't be bothered that your wife is now in South America but as dx100uk advises removing wife from mortgage could help protect you from a landlord claim. However I'm not sure how easy that will be in practice. Lender will likely want to carry out an affordability review of your finances before agreeing and may require you to apply for a new loan.

You and your wife are joint owners of the house? Do you own it as ‘joint tenants’ or ‘tenants in common’?   

WWW.GOV.UK

Check if you're a joint tenant or tenants in common. Change from joint tenants to tenants in common, or tenants in common to joint tenants

 

 

As a separate issue to the lease question, if you want to sell the house in the future and your wife is still named as joint owner and joint mortgagor/borrower it could cause you a lot of problems if you can't find her or she won't co-operate. So explore all the possibilities for removing her from mortgage and deeds as soon as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @dx100uk

Not sure how to take wife off deeds. I guess a call to the building society will be a start to this. If there are any links you have then point me in the right way.

I wasn't a director and just signed on her behalf.

The unit in my name is my responsibility. Took on to help with the extra business due. This has left me in a bad position though and liable for the full lease. Well, at least 12 months as there is a break clause at end of first year. I guess I could try to negotiate on this to settle.

If I walk away from it and the leaseholder pushes. I think they may have a responsibility to mitigate losses by re letting But not sure. 

 

Thanks @Ethel Street

Interesting link on the joint / tenants in common. I don't know which we are but wonder if I do a Land Reg search if this will show?

Will look at what is needed to take wife off deeds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

only use the .gov.uk land reg site about £8 i think, others are not .gov and can be VERY expensive and take a long time.

i believe there are FAQ's there too upon how to remove others from deeds too.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I also think to be safe you also need to do a bit of Due Diligence on the Company that was setup by your wife just to be safe so I would advise doing a Companies House Check. Either input the Company Name or Company Registration Number to get the information. as you want to see who is actually Named as the Directors for that Company and that your name is not there as a Director.

on the link below do the following:

1. Click Start Now.

2. Either enter the Companies Full Name or Registration Number

3. Have a good read of that main webpage.

4. Then Click on  'People' and have a good read on that to see who is a Director in case you have been added as a Director

5. On the link have a good check through it as you should be able to download different info under ;Filing History' for the company.

WWW.GOV.UK

Get company information including registered address, previous company names, directors' details, accounts, annual returns and company reports, if...

 

  • Like 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

Checked and I am not a director.

I have a commercial lease in my name.

Was only in the property 2 months before circumstances beyond my control meant business closed and i became unemployed.

Lease is in my own name and not limited co.

Have contacted the landlord to explain the above and they said they are not prepared to accept the keys and want to return them to me (I handed keys to the landlord).

I have mailed rather than trying to avoid them explaining the position again.

I wonder, in the event they want to pursue this in court, will they need to show that they have looked to mitigate the loss by re-letting the property?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

I believe that this relates to your existing thread.
It is very unhelpful to start two threads on the same issue

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/09/2023 at 08:04, Ethel Street said:

Married couples buying a house together are usually 'Joint Tenants' but Land Registry is where to check.,

The legal interest (the title held at LR) is ALWAYS a joint tenancy if held by more than one person.

It is the beneficial interest that can be tenancy in common or a joint tenancy, and the LR may not have that information.

 

I've just checked, and if the LR is served a notice to sever the joint tenancy of the beneficial interest, converting it into a tenancy in common, they'll add a notification that :

"No disposition by a sole proprietor of the registered estate
(except a trust corporation) under which capital money arises is
to be registered unless authorised by an order of the court."

 

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1180579/SEV__2023-08-29_.pdf

Edited by BazzaS
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's how you find out from the LR entry whether it is held as JT or TIC. When registering a joint title you are required to say whether you are registering as JT or TIC.

Limitations of LR information explained on LR blog.

 

HMLANDREGISTRY.BLOG.GOV.UK

News and updates from HM Land Registry

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

Sorry about the late reply. Been working away.

On the lease.

It was taken as part of the downsize of business and in my own name.

I have asked the agents to landlord to help with this and understand they don't really need to.

Latest reply from them was '

Unfortunately we cannot accept the keys for Unit 48 as it is in your personal name, and the Landlord expects you to abide by the terms of the clause.

 

You have signed for a three year agreement.

The agreement does allow for a break at end of year 1.

I currently have great credit and have never had issues with debt. I would like to avoid issues but not really sure of the best way to go to resolve the rent issue.

Any tips?

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi again.

Was wondering if there was any advice on my last post above?

I would like to approach the landlord with a possible fix (Not sure what this is yet) but wonder if there is a best way to go about this and hopefully avoiding court, CCJ's etc?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

There is a break option after the first 12 months.

I was thinking of offering them the 1 years rent as lump sum, but payable over say a 6 month period.

They are popular small units and easily let.

Not allowed to sublet.

I will think and look to approach them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all. It's been a while since I posted on this matter. I am wondering what the landlord and agents are up to.

I have been in touch with them and the billing departments (As they are still sending out invoices for the personal lease). I have explained that

1. I am now unemployed and although have limited savings, it looks close to my having to claim some sort of benefits unless I can find work.

2. The keys are back with them and I will not be returning to the property.

3. When they have a final statement, I would be happy to look at negotiating a full and final settlement.

No reply at all from them.

I understand that I am on the hook for this. But to me, as I am unable to find a new tenant for them, they, are bound to mitigate their potential losses by re-letting the unit.

Am I right here or is this pie-in-the-sky thinking on my behalf?

Thanks again for your help.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume when you say you "got in touch", it was in writing?

If so, I think you've put the ball firmly in their court and simply wait for a reply.

 

Also, I'm no legal expert, but as you say, mitigation seems to be an important aspect and could bite them if they try to take this further.

Especially if this is the case...

On 12/10/2023 at 00:09, LeaseDebt said:

They are popular small units and easily let.

Just a thought... Do you have a friend who could make an enquiry about rent/availability of your specific unit?😉

Keep email records obviously. They may be useful later.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All.

I have now received a Notice OF INTENDED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  from the solicitors acting on behalf of the landlord in this matter. I will scan and upload the same soon. I wanted to ask before though.

1. I returned the keys to the landlord around 28 August 2023 and explained that the business was no longer trading and that I was not in a position to pay the rents. The landlord responded to this by email 30 August 23. Not happy and wanting to return the keys back to me. This did not happen.

2. 20 October, 2023. I emailed the landlords again to confirm my inability to pay any rents due to unemployment and asking if there was a solution to resolve this matter. They replied this was doubtful.

3. 12 Jan, 2024. I emailed again to further confirm that the keys had been returned and that I would likely need to claim benefits soon.

My question is this.

I know and agree that I should pay the landlord some monies but I think I would like to pay to the date I handed the keys back (28 August 23).

I know they will probably want more.

But I also think that the landlord may have had a responsibility to mitigate their loss rather than leaving me to stress 3 times I can not pay.

Instead leaving it for several months later before using solicitors and threat of court action.

Am I being silly?

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 18/03/2024 at 09:45, LeaseDebt said:

I have now received a Notice OF INTENDED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  from the solicitors acting on behalf of the landlord in this matter. I will scan and upload the same soon. I wanted to ask before though.

Maybe upload the doc first?

Also tagging @lolerz who may be able to advise on this one?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan up a copy of the lease (redact the location and any personal information for you but not the landlord) and and a copy of the letter you've received please.

Upload <-- Guidance here.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...