Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Airline claims they overpaid compensation and demand refund within 10 days!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last July me and my wife's flights were delayed

 

I made a claim with the airline for compensation as per the regulations.

 

Since then I have had no communication at all from the airline but on checking my bank account I can see that two separate payments have been made by the airline, the second being two months after the first and for the same amount. I have had nothing from the airline to say what these payments are for or how they have been calculated.

 

Today I have received two emails addressed to 'Dear Mr/Mrs Customer' claiming that the second payment was in error and that I need to make an international bank transfer of the second payment within 10 days or they reserve the right tom take legal action. The amount they are asking for is two lots of £250.

 

First of all am I obliged to pay this when I have had no explanation for either of the payments the airline made?

 

Secondly how do I know this is not some kind of scam (can't even use my name) and is it safe to just make a payment to some foreign bank account using an IBAN number (I have never done one of these)?

 

Thirdly are they actually likely to take legal action and what would be the likely chance they are successful and that I would have to pay their costs and what might these costs be?

 

I don't actually have the £500 to pay right now anyway so if I engage with these emails, would I be entitled to ask for a payment plan?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course you're right to react as you have.  It could easily be a scam.

 

Can you please copy here the text of the e-mail and the e-mail address?

 

Plus how much were the two payments made to you?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also start reading up on this link.estoppel

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather not name the airline but it is a European one.

 

According to my bank statements, I have had two payments of £500 (none for £250 as referred to below, though there were two concurrent claims) and now being asked to make two payments of £250 back to the airline ( I have received a total of £1,000). So assuming it is genuine, the numbers look right if one assumes that I was supposed to get £250 per claim and not £500 as I have been paid; but as I have had no communication from the airline I don't actually know what they intended to pay.

 

The redacted email is as follows:

 

Dear Mr/Ms customer,
 
We are writing to you regarding a payment of 250.00 GBP that XXXX made on 2022-07-31 as compensation after accepting your request referred to above, in accordance with European regulations.
 
After analysing your case, XXXX has confirmed that this compensation was paid twice in error, the second payment being on 2022-11-20.
 
In accordance with the aforementioned, XXXX is requesting you to amicably return the amount of 250.00 GBP that was paid in error within the next 10 days, by bank transfer to the following account:
 
- Banking Entity: BANKINTER, S.A.
 
- BIC/SWIFT Code: BKBKESMMXXX
 
- IBAN: ES88 0128 9444 1901 0000 4423
 
- REFERENCE: xxxxxx + Passenger's Name and Surname
 
Once the transfer has been made, please send us the proof of payment to this email address.
 

XXXX will cover any bank charges or similar charges, provided they are reasonable and justified, that you may incur when refunding the money. You may automatically deduct them from the payment.

 

 
If you do not make the requested refund within the established time frame, XXXX reserves the right to take legal action to recover the amounts received in error, as well as any legal costs that may arise.
 
Please accept our sincere apologies once again for the inconvenience caused by this incident.
 

Yours sincerely,,

XXXX  airlines

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had received that it would have rung alarm bells immediately as a scam.

 

I can't point to anything specific that is wrong but something about it doesn't feel genuine. 

 

If it is a scam best not to reply. Replying to scammers just tells them you might be gullible enough to believe them and they'll get working on you.

 

If it were me I would ignore this completely. Wait and see if any genuine official court documents actually arrive at your address. If they do there will be plenty of time then to sort it out without going to court.

 

Does the genuine airline know your current home address? (To avoid risk of a backdoor CCJ).

 

Do you mean the email actually called you  "Mr Customer" and not your real name? If so then I'm even more suspicious.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that it exactly how it is addressed; very unprofessional if genuine. Only if it is a scam then how would they know I got compensation and how much ? - well I suppose emails aren't secure so that's one way or someone at the airline passing information on.

 

They do have my address.

 

I think I will do nothing and see what happens; I mean I have a good defense in that I submitted two claims and had two payments; neither of which I had any advise of from the airline. The recent emails could have gone to my junk box for all the airline knows; it is not from an email address I have had anything from before though does contain the airline name.

Edited by Ed Gasket
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you & Ethel.

 

Also, a company doesn't just rush to court.  They send reminder letters and ultimately have to send a Letter of Claim before. 

 

So if it isn't a scam you'll have lots of opportunity to settle with them.

 

Ignore for now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that it is not a scam. I'm sure that it is a genuine message.

However I think what has happened here is that there has been a mass overpayment to a very substantial number of customers.
They don't have the resources or the technological support to have designed an email which is apparently addressed to each person individually so they have sent out a bulk email and they are rather hoping that a substantial number of people will simply comply and repay.

On that basis, I agree with my site team colleagues above that you shouldn't do anything. Wait and see how it develops and come back here.

 

Read estoppel

Very important

Link to post
Share on other sites

By 'estoppel', do you mean I expected compensation X 2 and when I received two payments I believed that was what I was due as the airline had not explained what the payments were for or what the correct amount should have been?

 

Then I acted on the belief that the money was mine and have put myself in a position different to had I not been paid the money (i.e. I spent it) so should not have to pay it back. Is that the gist of the estoppel argument?

 

If a genuine error has been made, then I don't object to paying back the money BUT not just in response to a possible scam email without even my name in it, not without a proper statement showing what I should have received and what I have actually been paid, and then given a reasonable time to pay it back or some kind of payment plan. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

BANKINTER, S.A.

 

thats spain.

 

did you fly from spain?

did you book the tickets with them?

 

sorry this smells if you didn't.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ed Gasket said:

By 'estoppel', do you mean I expected compensation X 2 and when I received two payments I believed that was what I was due as the airline had not explained what the payments were for or what the correct amount should have been?

 

Then I acted on the belief that the money was mine and have put myself in a position different to had I not been paid the money (i.e. I spent it) so should not have to pay it back. Is that the gist of the estoppel argument?

 

If a genuine error has been made, then I don't object to paying back the money BUT not just in response to a possible scam email without even my name in it, not without a proper statement showing what I should have received and what I have actually been paid, and then given a reasonable time to pay it back or some kind of payment plan. 

 

In that case, just go about your business and come back here if you hear anything else.

There is nothing more to be said about this at the moment. I think that is the end of the discussion

Link to post
Share on other sites

One popular scam is to make believe someone received a payment by showing you fake bank statements. If you are positive that the money actually reached you it's unlikely to be one of those scams.

 

£250 would be the standard EC261 compensation for one person for a flight delay for a flight from/to Spain, so seems probably genuine to me and if only 1 of your flights was delayed than £500 is standard compensation.

 

If you do decide to pay back the overpayment, feel free to retain money used on drinks/food while you were waiting as you are also due that. You could in adition try lowball them a little for your efforts. After all they love charging us admin fees, so why wouldn't you try!

 

You should name the airline really as the community can only benefit from sharing of information. Based on the bank it's most probably going to be Vueling or Volotea?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...