Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i can instruct my dog to sit. if it does is a totally different matter. with one bloody nose from CAG in Scotland now, on what is a new adventure for them me, thinks lowells will seriously think twice before trying again. dx    
    • Farages 'promises to clacton   * The people of clacton "need to be incentivised, in many cases, to get off benefits and get back to work" * schools will have “to struggle on with more limited facilities" “Some say you can’t put students in Porta Cabins, but actually with teaching you can put students anywhere.” * NHS - looking at an insurance-based model similar to other countries, such as France      (err) * I never supported the £350million, I never thought it was right.”   BUTT Farage:  “Can we just get to the truth of this - £350 million a week is wrong, it’s higher than that,”     Video evidence emerges of Nigel Farage pledging EU millions for NHS after denial WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Ukip leader distanced himself from the pledge just hours after EU referendum results became known   Reform's Nigel Farage: 'Why I should be next Clacton MP' WWW.CLACTONANDFRINTONGAZETTE.CO.UK I met with Nigel Farage, Reform’s leader and General Election candidate for Clacton, in the Rose and Crown Pub in Thorpe-le-Soken.    
    • Here's the Law Gazette on today's evidence to the inquiry from Gareth Jenkins of Fujitsu. Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry live: Crucial prosecution witness Gareth Jenkins says Post Office 'tried to put words in my mouth' | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Gareth Jenkins, the Fujitsu engineer whose evidence was crucial to at least a dozen sub-postmaster prosecutions, begins four days of oral evidence to...  
    • So @theoldrouge * Are reform suspending farage for his putin apologist propaganda pieces? - Which he has doubled down on * Are you going to condemn antisemitic bigoted racism from your right wing  bigots? In effect, are you two going to look up from your gutter and follow labors lead?     "Farage (a “pub bore” who has no grasp of the complexity of “finding international solutions to problems”) - did not say that both Sweden and Finland, Nato’s latest two members, decided to join only after Putin ordered the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Finnish ex-Prime Minister Alexander Stubb said joining the alliance was a “done deal” for his country only as soon as Russian troops invaded Ukraine. Their membership more than doubled the Russian border with Nato. For Sweden, their decision to join ended more than two centuries of neutrality, such was the threat posed to them by Russia."   Simple fact - Russias invasion of Ukraine forced Finland to join NATO - doubling Russias border with NATO countries.    
    • I have read that thread but it started when received court claim form  im not at that stage yet  I'm asking if I should do anything just now or not contact at all  looks like a standard letter i received giving me 7 days when first letter said they would give 14 days but didn’t and sent 7 days  once again. Dx  thanks for your help and everyone here I get lost in the other posts but have read them 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TPS ANPR PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - Wrong Reg - boddingtons Gt Ducie Street, Francis Street, Manchester, M3 1PQ


Recommended Posts

Hello

Back again 😁

My latest ticked comes from Total Car Parks in Manchester (BPA).

I accidentally entered the wrong reg plate in and have duly received my letter.

I take it this gets ignored? I’m guessing presenting evidence has no gain?

thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong reg is dealt with in the new guidelines. sort of being written out of a reason to issue a speculative invoice now

Still fill out our sticky please and scan stuff up

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 30/9/22

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 5/10/22

 

3 Date received 10/10/22
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n/a
 

7 Who is the parking company? Total car parks

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] boddingtons Gt Ducie Street (Francis Street), Francis Street, Manchester, M3 1PQ
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

BPA

 

PCN.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Total Car parks ANPR PCN - Wrong Reg - boddingtons Gt Ducie Street (Francis Street), Francis Street, Manchester, M3 1PQ

Excellent news.  They got paid.  A wrong reg is legally "de minimis" ("the law does not deal with trivialities").

 

It's years since we've seen a PPC try court for a wrong reg case - because years ago when they tried the judges gave them a right kicking.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will show them the proof - just not yet.

 

Let them continue to destroy the Amazon with their daft threats. 

 

If they ever send a Letter of Claim then reply with a version of post 10 here  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/450714-cel-anpr-pcn-morrisons-butterfly-walk-car-park-denmark-hill-camberwell-london-se5-8rw/#comments

 

Since this letter was drawn up not one Cagger has been taken to court.

 

Relax and laugh at them for the time being but do come back if a Letter of Claim turns up.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot Dave.

The common consensus from what I can see is that the going rate for an invoice for this ‘crime’ is £20, which I feel is excessive for a genuine error like this, which can very simply be proven.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its de minimis because they have suffered no loss a car parked they were paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 13/10/2022 at 07:31, Dave962 said:

Thanks a lot Dave.

The common consensus from what I can see is that the going rate for a fine for this ‘crime’ is £20, which I feel is excessive for a genuine error like this, which can very simply be proven.

NOT A FINE!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've had to hide your post as you left your real name showing.

 

In any case it's a threatagram that you can laugh at and ignore.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

PDF sorted

 

note it says in 2 places this debt is NOT subject to Bailiff Enforcement.

and note CAREFULLY what i have removed too.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

Again apologies and thanks for looking out for me. I’ve noted what you have done there and will take more care in future.

 

The note about not being subject to enforcement is very interesting and seems surprising on the face of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Dave962 said:

The note about not being subject to enforcement is very interesting and seems surprising on the face of it.

why?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats because it is what all DCA's do in one way or another as they have ZERO legal powers on ANY DEBT.

people just dont READ letters properly...ever.

 

just because the name of the company has bailiff in it and they have a debt collection wing and they have a TV program about them as bailiffs, people dont realise they operate only on business debts, and landlord evictions, not consumer debt!

and a consumer debt can never be subject to bailiffs unless its been to court. and 9/10 is less than £600 so High Court bailiffs can never be asked for via a court.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you misunderstand the situation which is exactly what they want. DCBL are bailiffs and HCEO, aka Enforcement Agents, and that part is the Ch5 Don't Pay scenario. They also act as regular Debt Collectors, which unlike bailiffs are paper tiger's they have to put on a ThreatOgram not subject to bailiff action or they would be in the doo doo.

 

For bailiff involvement you would need to lose in court given a CCJ, which is  not then paid and as the debt is likely to be under £600 with a PCN claim they wouldn't likely be the bailiffs sent ,would be County Court bailiffs. Its all psychological pressure to "persuade" someone to pay.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no I kind of understand, thanks to you guys.

 

I mean it’s just so wrong how they use these dirty tactics to pursue their gains. As you say so many people have the fear of life put into them. It just amazes me how they are allowed to get away with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi.

 

Time to do a search on CAG for a suitable snotty letter. Plenty of examples here.

 

The purpose of sending this letter is to let Total Car Parks know that you'll be trouble if this gets to court, without going into so much detail that you let them know what your major points are. This can persuade them that it's not worth pursuing you, but we can't promise.

 

HB

 

 

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HB. So is this the point where I reveal my name and make a case for myself? Up to now I think I’ve not admitted my part in the matter. I’ll take a look like you say and see what they say, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...