Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ticketed - Residents bay introduced AFTER I parked there!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 713 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So, not sure if there's been a case like this on here before, certainly can't find one.

 

for years, I've been parking on an unrestricted side-street in the middle of Ipswich.

 

There's been a consultation for a couple of years about turning into residents' bays, and they got as far as marking the bays and putting up the empty signposts.

 

I've been keeping an eye open for when this might come into operation.

 

Since the pandemic, they've stopped making parking orders available physically at libraries or council offices.

 

The specific parking order relevant here is online at https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/assets/council-and-democracy/consultations-petitions-and-elections/Bridge-area-Ipswich/198649-RPZ5-DRAFT-ORDER-Rev-4-FINAL-DRAFT.pdf -

 

although the space where the dates for the commencement of the restriction are left blank. in other words, there's no way to know when they'd be introducing it.

 

Which brings us here.

I parked up last Tuesday (7th June), and as previously, no signage to indicate any restriction.

 

When I went back to the car yesterday (Tuesday 14th June), I'd had a ticket slapped on.

 

The empty signposts now had the restrictions on, and there was a temporary yellow sign at the top of the road indicating restrictions would commence on the 13th (which definitely wasn't there when I parked).

 

Not that it has any legal bearing, but I'd been in bed with covid for 3 days so was later to moving the car than I might have been.

 

So what now?

The Traffic Management Order on their website is clearly invalid.

 

After a lot of searching, I can't find one with the dates on, so if there is a valid TMO then it's not easily accessible to the public.

 

There's a convoluted interactive map on Suffolk County Council website that shows restrictions - but surely that doesn't constitute a TMO?

 

I presume there should need to be a proper legal document published and accessible somewhere.

 

Is there a 'reasonable' time limit for putting the temp sign up?

 

Less than 3 working days is not long tbf.

 

Thanks for your ideas!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No expert but l will assist with a bump. 

 

@dx100uk    @Andyorch     @unclebulgaria67     @FTMDave     Can any of you advise this guy. 

 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Please wait for other to pop in to advise.

 

Exactly where you parked could you give us a postcode?

 

From the PDF you posted up I take it this is to do with Residents Parking Permits for that specific area that have been introduced please correct me if I am wrong but is so:

 

1. Were the Resident notified of this?

 

2. Were the Residents informed of the date of Introduction and how to apply for a Residents Parking Permit and also a Visitors/Guest Permit and any costs involved? (please also ask other residents if they knew about this)

 

This is the Suffolk County Council Link: (Residents parking schemes (zones))

https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/parking/residents-parking-schemes-zones/

 

This Link is Ipswich Borough Council Link: (on Permit Parking Areas from reading the PDF you Posted could you clarify from this link if your specific area you were ticketed is listed?)

WWW.IPSWICH.GOV.UK

If you are a council tenant or leaseholder living in a designated area you can apply for a parking permit.

 

Could you also complete this for us as well:

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you going to appeal the ticket due to very sudden change in parking restrictions while parked up and you were in bed with Covid ?

 

WWW.IPSWICH.GOV.UK

What to do if you receive a parking Penalty Charge Notice.

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 16/06/2022 at 02:38, stu007 said:

...

 

1. Were the Resident notified of this?

 

2. Were the Residents informed of the date of Introduction and how to apply for a Residents Parking Permit and also a Visitors/Guest Permit and any costs involved? (please also ask other residents if they knew about this)

 

This is the Suffolk County Council Link: (Residents parking schemes (zones))

https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/parking/residents-parking-schemes-zones/

 

 

 

I might be mistaken (apologies if I am) but I suspect the OP may not be able to answer those questions as I suspect he is not a resident on that street/in that area?

Link to post
Share on other sites

But has parked there for years...

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Resident or Not The OP may be renting a room house owned buy work place or the college/university in Ipswich or even a hotel room. Either way they should have been informed this was happening in advance. 

 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose residents of the street will have been informed of the change.

 

As I said, I may be mistaken (and apologies if I am) but I suspect that the OP is not a resident of the street in question, and simply uses it as somewhere convenient (for them) to park.  It's the way that the OP says "for years, I've been parking on an unrestricted side-street in the middle of Ipswich" and "I've been keeping an eye open for when this might come into operation".  It doesn't read as if it was written by somebody who actually lives on the street and who would therefore know what was happening.

 

I'm not sure what obligations the council would have to inform specific people - other than residents of the street - that the changes were happening wef such and such a date.  How would they know which people to inform other than residents?  Anyway, the OP might well have missed any general public notification made by the council if he was not specifically informed as a resident.

 

(NB  -  my comment was originally made in respose to the opening questions posed by stu007 at #3 (see the relevant bit I quoted) which appeared to assume that the OP was a resident and that the council had wrongly failed to inform them of the change.  I'm not so sure that they are a resident - although I may be wrong as I'm only reading bewteen lines that the OP has not filled in... )

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

As l said it might be a hotel that he stays in and you would have thought that the hotel would have been informed. Even air b&b etc. Just because they are not having residents does not mean they dont need informing. 

 

 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@JohnnyBallCan you give us the information about the PCN requested in Post #3.

 

When my Council introduces new parking controls, for the first couple of weeks they usually do what the call 'light touch' enforcement, which essentially means that if you can give a convincing explanation of how you were caught out by the new rules they will cancel it. Don't know what Ipswich do but you have set out some good reasons why they should cancel it (that you were parked there already before the day they started). You should be able to build a good case around that. 

 

You can mention that the TMO seems to be invalid as well but I wouldn't make that the main reason for asking for the PCN to be cancelled. 

 

This link to Ipswich website with details about how to make representations was posted earlier in the thread: Penalty Charge Notices (PCN) | Ipswich Borough Council

 

Keep an eye on the timescales. 14 days to makean 'informal challenge'. You are 7 days into that already.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP needs to be more pro active with there own Topic and answer the question asked if they want the relevant advice to assist them with this.

 

As pointed out there is a Time Limit to Appeal this and each day is counting down.

 

We can do nothing more to assist until the OP come back.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...