Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Someone used my address to register a car - Now under siege for his traffic offences


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 103 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello There everybody I hope you are well .

I am on here because I am pretty much at my wits end and I am very unsure of what to do next.

Since mid June we have been receiving mail for a  john smith at our address, we were returning to sender at first - the letters have been averaging about 15 a week for the last few months.

about 6 weeks ago one envelope had been pretty much decimated by the rain and was open - It was a recovery letter from a high court.

I got in touch with the dvla and they conducted an investigation and they wrote back a few weeks later saying that this person had given my address when registering their car and my details have now been removed from their files.

some of these letters have actually been addressed to the householder/occupier and to my horror whoever this person  is seems to be conducting a one man crime spree the length and breadth of the country and is wracking up motoring offences wherever he or she goes,

Cutting a very long story short

some of the firms have been very good to be fair and have listened to what i have to say and some of the letters have stopped but others are just unreachable and i simply do not have the time to spend on the phone all day trying to speak to a fellow member of the human race.

Things Escalated this weekend with the involvement of the infamous Marstons and they were far from helpful and they want me to go online and open a case with this mystery guys client number - Not a chance - that is pretty much admitting the offence is mine . 

Needless to say I am worried sick and i just want all this to stop. 

Many thanks guys any help or advice greatly appreciated.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

can you list up which companies are still sending letters?

This one is quite hard - There isnt a one fits all solution, you’ll have to contact each one individually

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its quite simple.

ignore them all and stop returning letters.

any law enforcement, council, DCA, Bailiff need to check voters register.

no matter what these are be they motoring offences or private parking tickets, even if these got to court, NONE give the power of forced entry to your property.

sadly you've probably elongated this suffering by sending letters back and ringing people.

4 hours ago, brownie2024 said:

I got in touch with the dvla and they conducted an investigation and they wrote back a few weeks later saying that this person had given my address when registering their car and my details have now been removed from their files.

you've got your name off the vehicles V5C now , just run off a few copies ready to hand out or mail to anyone that gets silly.

and stay off the phone. total waste of time

thread title updated

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Someone used my address to register a car - Now under siege for his traffic offences

If this issue continues to cause you problems, keep hold of a number of the communications and think about contacting Police to see what help they can offer.

If the communications contain registration number and the Police believe the vehicle could be being used to commit crimes, then they might be willing to flag up the registration on national database for a stop to be made to check drivers details.

The Police of course may not be willing to do this, unless you have enough communications to show that this is not just someone having made an admin error with address.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning folks thank you very much for your advice so far 

i have several copies of the letter from the dvla ready to roll if required. Thank you will do.

yes as far as i am aware they have just used my Address -i do not own a car currently 

The firms that are being a bit naughty are 

Marstons

UKPC This a county court one and they uncontactable 

greater london central zone 

Drakes bailiffs have just backed off at the weekend they have suspended their file on it ,

These are the only ones i have engaged with all the other letters keep getting sent back return to sender not at this address. 

It is  the marstons one that concerns me the most really, the person i spoke with was quite unpleasant -borderline hostile i thought, not helpful at all. Contacting the police was a great suggestion, i have just got off the phone with them - they were not too interested sadly.

Do you think my best course of action is just sitting it out and waiting for whoever to show up ?

legally i do not have to let them in do i ?

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dx100uk said:

no matter what these are be they motoring offences or private parking tickets, even if these got to court, NONE give the power of forced entry to your property.

cant say it any clearer.

just ignore EVERYONE now

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx is spot on.

Out of interest - how much is the UKPC one?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

@brownie2024 If you have not previously experienced DCA or bailiffs vsiting I suggest you do a bit of research online into what baliffs can and can't do.

It's easy to say what a DCA (debt collector) has the power to do - absolutely nothing, as advised several times upthread. A DCA acts for the company who claims you owe them money. Just tell them to foxtrot oscar and if they won't leave your property tell them you will call police 101 and report them for illegal harrassment. You are entitled to film and record them with your phone as a record.

Bailiffs are different and do have some powers but not FORCED entry into your home for civil debts. Bailiffs are acting on behalf of the courts so can only be involved if the case has gone to court and a court judgement has been issued against "John Smith" at your address.

Bailiffs can visit your house but cannot force an entry. That means, for example, they cannot break down doors, use a locksmith, climb through windows. But if they find a door that is open or unlocked they can come in through it. So keep them locked.  That's why we recommend that you have your letter ready to hand to any baliff that turns up and you give it to them through the letterbox or through a window and don't open the door to them in case they barge past you then claim you voluntarily let them in. Once in legally they do have some powers. Look it up.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A question for the bailiff experts, if a bailiff comes to the door they will start by asking for John Smith, to which @brownie2024 will reply doesn't live here/don't know him.

To which the bailiff will presumably reply "can you prove to me that you aren't John Smith". 

Do we advise that brownie2024 should show the bailiff photo ID - passport, driving licence - to prove they aren't John Smith, as the quickest way to get rid of the bailiff? 

Hold the ID up from inside the window so bailiff can see it, don't hand it to them.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

not his problem he doesn't have to ID himself or interact with bailiffs at all they really have no powers to demand people ID themselves, same as the Police in public or at your home, if you've not been charged with anything you are under ZERO liability under Law to ID yourself.

 

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Man in the middle said:

What would he declare? That he is not John Smith? It should be fairly easy to prove that to anybody who asked, surely.

That's why I asked the question, I thought a swear handed to a doorstepper might help, that's all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

any news?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...