Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

G24 pcn Sports Direct, Heathcote Rd, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent ST3 2NU .Not Paid, yet.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 781 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if new signs have been put up since 2019 in differing positions/places or the PPC 'ownership' has changed each PPC needs its own permission as well as additional permission to change sign size locations etc. i think BF eluded to this earlier in the thread?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like signage and ANPR illegal probably then.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I had another letter , this time from bwlegal . Saying that they have “been instructed by G24 on relation to the balance due for the PCN” . Doesn’t say what they have been instructed to do,  Says “ if I don’t pay this then may proceed to our legal process ,and the next contact from us could be a Letter of Claim “. They are also offering a plan to pay £15 a month. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

 Another letter for wife from bwlegal today . Saying firstly “ Your outstanding account with us “.Then goes on to say that they are available to discuss plans that their  client has approved for me, via contact ctr, web chat and customer portal, and ensure the best advice about how to manage my account ?  

 

I have to register ,answer security questions, they may also need to ask some addition income questions.

Should I not answer by 14th Sept , my account  will progress to Letter of Claim on expiry , if the balance remains unpaid our client will take legal action to recover the some due .

 

Really could do without this hassle at the moment.

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

as already advised

you ignore them until/unless you DO get a letter of claim.

 

stop falling for silly dangly bit waving by the fleecers trying to intimidate you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are both retired , my wife is unwell , plus other family illness problems we are coping with at the moment .We are NOT  falling for silly dangling bit waving by these fleecers , but as you may not understand ,just a bit fed up of and could do without the hassle at the moment .

Edited by princess roxy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats all they can do..

chin up...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember there are six of you in the forum in the same boat.

 

No-one has been taken to court.

 

Nobody has even received a Letter Before Action.

 

Despite all their bluster, G24 have done nothing of substance and presumably know they are in a very weak position.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

They must be sending a round of these out, Samtex got one today as well.  Safe to ignore.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have thought that BW legal would have got the message by now-that you do not want to pay their grossly and unlawful invoice of £160 no matter how often they ask.  All they can do is send out stupid letters hoping to frighten people into paying. Sadly many do pay when there was no need to. It is just a question of staying strong knowing that the money they are demanding would not stand up in Court.

 

As a matter of interest was their letter headed Final Notice. If not you can expect to get one sooner or later. This will be followed by another and another Final Notice letter. They are so stupid that they do not know what Final means.  Scientists in laboratories work with amoebas that have more  sense than all of  BW legal put together. 

 

So just relax have a cup of tea and have a laugh at how incompetent they are. Also the Government is bringing out a new system that will do away with the need for BPA and IPC and will mean a huge loss of revenue to those crooks that  run parking companies.

 

Doubtless some of them will not survive having to run their grubby businesses in an honest way. Obviously the legal leeches who hang on to the car parking companies will also suffer. We will all take pleasure in their discomfiture.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are idiots.  Not exactly a grand apocalyptic threat is it - pay up or ...

 

... we'll send you another letter, so there!

 

Relax & ignore them.

 

But do come here if they really do send the Letter of Claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Today my wife has received a Letter of Claim from  bwlegal.      

 

 They are still asking my wife to pay ,and if no payment is received by the 28th October they are instructed to issue a County Court claim without further reference to her.  Such legal action could result in her being liable for costs ,pushing the total up to estimate of £254 .

 

There are 2pages of all their info , and 2pages of forms to fill in and return ., wanting to know our income  and expenditures .

 

My wife isn’t too well ,this is all she needs.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

snotty letter time

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're the second Cagger today to have received a LoC for this car park.  Obviously G24 are sending LoCs to everyone.

 

You need to reply with a suitable snotty letter to show them you'd be big trouble if they did do court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t even know where to start with a snotty letter , I know their signage  wasn’t good ,and no where near as it is today ,. Think someone had pics of this . So would appreciate any help I could get. ie what to say , what forms to fill in and send back etc . All new to me and my wife .

 

what do I need to do now , send letters or emails , g24 or bwlegal . say what ?

I would like to see this through ,unfortunately I may need some help .

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send proper letters, not emails. If this ever does go to court, these people can send something at 23.59 the day before a court hearing and you won't have time to read it. Also, email lets them harrass you for free.

 

Do a search for snotty letter in the white search box, top right in the red strip at the top of this page.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A snotty letter has to tread the fine line between showing you're confident about hammering them in court without playing your cards too early.  So let's have a first try -

 

 

Dear Rachael and Sean,

 

cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I creased up at the idea that you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and put my hand in my pocket!

 

I presume as usual you've been too bone idle to do any due diligence otherwise you'd have immediately seen that your client's case is total pants.  I mean it's all there in the Stoke Sentinel.  I have all the photos.  Does the name Nick Cartlidge ring a bell?

 

Greedy greedy G24 couldn't resist adding £60 Unicorn Food Tax.  Big own goal!  Judges don't like these made-up sums, do they?

 

Your client can either drop this madness or get a good hammering in court.  Either solution is fine by me.  I would delight in obtaining an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spending the dosh on a nice foreign holiday now that we can all travel again, while all the time laughing at your client.

 

I look forward to your deafening silence.

 

COPIED TO G24 LTD

 

 

However, hang on a little while to see the opinion of the other regulars.

 

I'm presuming they've changed the amount from £100 to £160.  They usually do.  Is the figure right?

 

The stuff I mentioned about the Stoke Sentinel is all in the public domain  https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/motorist-claims-victory-over-parking-5588416

 

Edited by FTMDave
Extra info added as suggested by OP
  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...