Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Premier Park/PP Legal PCN salford court Claimform - No ticket - Wright Street Car park Southport ***Claim Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1603 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm posting this on behalf of an elderly gentleman who has absolutely no computer skills.

 

In March he received a Parking fine from Premier Park for 15mins in a local carpark.

 

He swears the machine wasn't working on the day but has no independent witnesses.

 

He spent 15mins looking at the instructions including when he went out of the carpark to see where the nearest phone box was.

when he realised it was too far he came back and drove out.

 

I'll attach the correspondence to this post.

I helped him draft letters based on forums we'd looked at.

 

Premier Park were useless to say the least.

Unfortunately he didn't get his POPLA appeal in in time (i.e. by a few days and although POPLA state appeals might be submitted late, they don't make it easy), and there is a letter attached showing how they were less than useless with this also.

 

We are now at the County Court stage.

Is it worth fighting it further or just paying the £235?

 

1. the claim has been filed in Exeter and the gentleman has a heart condition so cannot travel that far, his nearest court is in Liverpool.

he was served on the 3rd.

does the 14days mean he can apply to change courts.

 

2. Is it possible to have the charge reduced?

the first time Premier Park even mention checking the machine to see if it works is the their court statement, if he'd known before maybe he might have thought there was an issue with the coin and paid the original £60/£100.

He's still adamant it wasn't working.

 

3. I didn't include the POPLA complaint form as it's the same as the original letter.

 

Thanks in advance

Popla complaint redacted 15:6.pdf

Popla complaint ADR redacted 18:7.pdf

Premier Park Case.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

He won't have to pay the charge so don't worry. The regulars will be around to explain why. Its pretty much an easy win for your friend.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the matter will be heard in his local court so they will have to travel.

What he needs to do is send back the form saying he intends to defend in full (basically ticking a box) and for brevity and speed of response state in the box where he puts his defence

 

 

1.There was no contract formed between the claimant and the defendant so there cannot be monies owed do to breach of conditions that cannot apply.

2.Further to this the defendant does not believe that the claimant has locus standi.

3. and that the signage is anyway there in breach of planning law so the defendant cannot enter into a criminal compact even if they wanted to.

 

 

the first point expanded will cover all of the arguments about the ticket machine but no need for detail at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Premier Park Ltd

claimants Solicitors:PP Legal Newton Abbott

 

Date of issue – 28/09/2018

Date to acknowledge - 16/10/2018

date to submit defence - 30/10/2018

 

What is the claim for –

Particulars of claim on separate sheet so I've included a copy attached the Location Wright Street Car park Southport

 

Anount Claimed £150 + Court Fee £35 + legal rep costs £50 = £235

 

What is the value of the claim?£235 Original Parking charge was £100

 

Has the claim been issued by the Private parking Company or was the PCN assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? Parking Company

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? N/A

Particulars of claim.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ya

if you read the upload guide

it tells you not to use a pen

 

we can see straight thru it

I've hidden you upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

 

get a CPR 3114 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim)(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defenceicon regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 points

shame you've called it a fine here and a penalty charge on the appeal

 

if you look carefully

nowhere does any of the paperwork from the fleecers use those words

probably why they issued the claim as [and in the appeal] sadly it shows you don't know what you are really talking about

just copied stuff from the internet without understanding it.

 

never mind we can sort it

was have large corks and big buckets to bail you out.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you go to maoneyclaim online and set up an account and them acknowledge the claim? If not you had better do so today or fax the AOS to Northampton. You will be given a couple of days grace but if you havent done this by this evening you wont get anywhere

Link to post
Share on other sites

The AOS was filed last week. There was no facility on the claim form to file via MCOL which I found strange so it was filed by email.

We now have until the 30th to get the defence filed but I'd rather get it done earlier.

I'll see my friend tomorrow evening and get it put together then.

I'm attaching the redacted files re DX's advise (Thank you as always for picking that one up).

 

I'm just checking some research I've done with the local council and with the land registry which has thrown up a bit of an anomaly.

I'll post the info shortly to see if anyone thinks it will help.

 

Also is there an easy way to delete the originals or do I have to ask someone?

Premier Park Case_0001.pdf

Particulars of Claim_0001.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there not a password at the end of the further information box on the claimform

 

had to hide both uploads

names and ref numbers still showing and still places whereby your old pen crossout can be seen through clearly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only ones I left was the name and address of the carpark which was asked for in the form previously. There was no password on the claim form Just info on how to file. I get the impression that the County Court Money Claims Centre is still operating from Salford as well as MCOL running in Northampton. So this has been filed in Salford by Premier Park.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the Land Registry. That probably is nothing. The company number that owns the land is MJ CO(PROPERTY) LTD Co No 11192779 ℅ kjg lop 1 City Road East, Manchester M15 4PN.

 

The contract the parking company has is with Park Equity Invest Ltd company no 09741268 ℅ kjg lop 1 City Road East, Manchester M15 4PN. There are three registrations of charge on this land with this companies name on it, however they are dated the 22/10/18 so I'm presuming the land has changed hands and the registry has not been updated yet.

 

 

The charge is for a debenture. there .was planning permission granted in 2015 for a pre payment car park.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no just send it as is

all the rest can be dealt with later in the process

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unusual for this to be issued from salford..urm..

new tactic to hope defendants miss deadline p'haps

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only ones I left was the name and address of the carpark which was asked for in the form previously. There was no password on the claim form Just info on how to file. I get the impression that the County Court Money Claims Centre is still operating from Salford as well as MCOL running in Northampton. So this has been filed in Salford by Premier Park.

 

premier parking pdf has:

name on page 3

 

the rest is ok

 

next time don't use a PDF editor to obscure things

all your black boxes can be remove with an editor.

 

I've further updated the thread title to better reflect the thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't I converted it to a .tff changed that then saved that as a pdf for a couple of changes (where i'd left a teensy bit showing which supposedly isn't reversible, the rest i stuck two blank white stickers and used black biro to scribble on those.

 

 

i'll be an expert soon.

 

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

no worries

strange then

im using an old adobe pro 9 editor.

 

when you scroll thru the pages the black box don't immediately fall atop the text they blank out till the screen settles

and in admin mode you can click the box and drag it away from the text underneath it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done perfect.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

salford process a lot of Northamptons work. you ofteh have to send stuff back to there rather than Northampton, who issue but dont process the aftermath.

 

 

 

unusual for this to be issued from salford..urm..

new tactic to hope defendants miss deadline p'haps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, as thery say that you failed to pay for the entire parking period we will need to see thei signage to see if there is such a condition or requirement in the first place and then how they expect you to pay if their machines are duff. also we would like soem pictures of the parking machine themselves and any blurb on or with them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok folks quick question. completely forgot to send in the N180 form, luckily the court has given until the !7th Dec to file it. I just want to check does my friend tick for mediation or not?

 

The PPC have responded to the CPR request of which I'll upload the details later today.

 

They've enclosed

"the relevant pages from our contract with the land owner"

otherwise there is nothing interesting,

 

nothing to prove the machine was working and one paragraph stating why they've omitted the rest of the contract

"Please note these are not subject to the Town and County Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007.

This is due to the same being on enclosed land which is excluded from the direct control of Planning Authorities."

 

Can someone clarify this situation for me?

They do have planning permission for use as a carpark although there is no mention of signage.

 

I'll upload a copy of that later too and photos of the signage.

As i said I heading round to my friends now so we can fill in the N180 and get it served.

 

Also for future reference when my friend does go to court can I go in and help him in front of the judge or will he have to go in by himself?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...