Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Is this a new parking event or have you posted about it before please? HB
    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can they make this deduction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am an IT consultant who works through my own Ltd company.

 

I have been offered a job that is within IR35 this means I will pay tax, NI and all other deductions which I dont have a problem with.

 

However the employer wants to deduct from me their costs such as Employers NI in other wrds bear their employer costs, is this right?

 

I am due to sign the contract tomorrow so urgent guidance/help would be really appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's really just changing the price of the contract. Would you be happy with / accept the lower pay rate? If not negotiate up to cover it.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about the legal details of this but I think it's really a commercial question for you, not a legal or tax question. The employer wants, financially, to be in the position he would be in if IR35 didn't apply. ie, he'd pay you a sum of money each month and have no other costs whatsoever. He knows that IR35 doesn't let him do that but he can achieve the same financial position by making you contractually liable for paying employers NI. The precise payment routes and mechanism to achieve that I can't comment on. The question for you is simple. They have offered you a gross pay rate and told you what deductions you will pay yourself (under the deal they are proposing to you). What will that leave you with Net and are you prepared to work for that? If yes accept the offer. If no negotiate a higher gross pay rate. Everything else is detail and paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about the legal details of this but I think it's really a commercial question for you, not a legal or tax question. The employer wants, financially, to be in the position he would be in if IR35 didn't apply. ie, he'd pay you a sum of money each month and have no other costs whatsoever. He knows that IR35 doesn't let him do that but he can achieve the same financial position by making you contractually liable for paying employers NI. The precise payment routes and mechanism to achieve that I can't comment on. The question for you is simple. They have offered you a gross pay rate and told you what deductions you will pay yourself (under the deal they are proposing to you). What will that leave you with Net and are you prepared to work for that? If yes accept the offer. If no negotiate a higher gross pay rate. Everything else is detail and paperwork.

 

The question I am asking is about the legality of it, I can do the math and work out the numbers the questions is are they allowed to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ben,

 

I'm looking at this pragmatically ...........

 

A bargain is being struck here. You're offering your services to the employer. And they're offering a salary package based on you being dealt with under Schedule E (PAYE) and not Schedule D (self employed).

 

You being treated as employed means they pay Employers NIC on the salary they pay you.

 

Bottom line is, will they pay you enough (after making whatever deductions they see appropriate) to make you happy, after you've paid employees NIC and PAYE tax.

 

They can make you any offer they like whether they refer to clawing back Employers NIC or not.

 

But I doubt they'll refer to this specific issue when confirming the job offer in writing.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to be very confused. First you say that you work through your own Ltd company, then that you are employed and paid directly by the employer.

 

 

Also, you say that the 'job' is within IR35. Who has decided this? Is this within the public sector? You may be able to agree a contract that is outside IR35, as long as the working practices are in line with the contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to be very confused. First you say that you work through your own Ltd company, then that you are employed and paid directly by the employer.

 

 

Also, you say that the 'job' is within IR35. Who has decided this? Is this within the public sector? You may be able to agree a contract that is outside IR35, as long as the working practices are in line with the contract.

 

If you look at my 1st post I state I am IT Consultant working through my own Ltd company but offered a role within IR35. They decided it was within iR35 as it is the position of least risk, the working detail is in fact, outside IR35 for example I am supplying my own equipment but they are too frightened b HMRC saying if they find out in thr future a rule is within IR35 then they become liable for any tax and NI.

 

So not confused just questioning the legality of having to pay employers NI Liability then deducting it from the employee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ben,

 

Thanks for those links, but i am employed and paid directly by the employer so my question is can they deduct from me their NI payments

 

As Emmzzi says, if your contract refers to the employer recouping the cost of employer's NIC, and you agreed to it, then it may be acceptable.

 

However if you did NOT agree to such deductions in your contract, then I think they can be challenged.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware the decision regarding IN or OUT of IR35 lies with you (Ltd Co). Your client currently is not at risk of getting this wrong, unless the client is a Public Sector organisation. If you were to deem this contract outside of IR35 and HMRC later challenged this then they would look to you for the shortfall in NIC/tax (not your client). Maybe you can convince them that there is no risk to them?

 

 

If you were to allow them to deduct the Employers NI then how can you be sure that they pass this on to HMRC? I don't think that there is a mechanism for them to pay this to HMRC as you are not their employee.

 

 

In my opinion your client is just trying to knock down your rate. You have to ask yourself how much do they need you, and how much do you need the gig? It is a commercial decision that only you can make.

 

 

Hope this helps.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an accountant, but it doesn't sound to me like this arrangement works.

 

Is the suggestion that you would pay HMRC on behalf of the employer? Or is the suggestion that the employer would not pay their employer's NI contributions, and would refer HMRC to you when they get chased?

 

A clause which makes an employee liable for paying employer's NI contributions is not enforceable. I'm not sure how it works with IR35 but I would imagine it should be the same situation.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you might find this specialist contractor forum thread on IR35 helpful (while not vouching for its accuracy, I'd still call HMRC) http://forums.contractoruk.com/public-sector-ir35/120479-working-public-sector-faq-about-ir35.html

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...