Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
    • Thanks for coming back to us. There are no guarantees - but remember that so far MET have not had the guts to put even a single case before a judge.  Not once. Yours is one of seven court cases. Three ongoing like yours. In two MET bottled it as Witness Statement stage approached. In one the allocating judge decided their Particulars of Claim were rubbish and threw the case in the bin. Just the one victory by MET by default when the motorist stupidly didn't file a defence. So there is every chance that MET will throw in the towel in your case too if you stand firm. Please keep us informed of what is happening. Regarding being abroad, that is no reason for things going wrong, you can request an on-line hearing and we've had several cases where the PPC gave up when the motorist moved abroad. But please keep us in the loop.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 998 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Add on

Hs2 currently projected at aprox £55B

 

Trident Replacement £205B (and the rest)

 

London international banks' TAX relief (A TRIFLING) £1B+ a year for just the 7 major players (2014 figures based on UK corporation tax

- $5.3B profit yet only £21M tax paid))

 

Civil service extra staff charges for Brexit estimated a a trivial half a £B

 

 

 

....

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny enough i was reading a conversation on another forum where they were discussing that Brexit might prove impossible, with even some Brexiteers thinking that their hopes will be dashed. Many people just don't realise just how integrated the UK has become with the EU. Thousands of businesses throughout the UK rely on the EU single market making it easy for them. Once people see the cost to them including jobs, they will be challenging the government.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wait until the economics justifies Brexit not happening. The leavers are going to have a right fit.

 

Not likely.

The only people trowing toys out of the pram, stomping their feet, crying, moaning, claiming that we're all racist, having heart attacks, fits, foaming from their mouth and generally screaming nonsense are the remainers.

That's why they're known as re-moaners.

Leavers like me are just watching the raw desperation of the minority trying to impose their policies on the majority.

Ironically the consider themselves democratic individuals.

I don't have much hope that thing will ever change.

In politics I have always seen a small minority of spoilt kids who never worked one single day of their life, ruling the rest of us.

Things don't change and this elite will always impose their ways upon the majority.

I have the courage to change things that I can change, the patience to accept what I cannot change and the wisdom to know the difference.

I can't change politics, so I live a better life just accepting it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wait until the economics justifies Brexit not happening. The leavers are going to have a right fit.

 

 

There's the reverse of that.

A smaller economy with higher costs will have to cut costs

 

Lets start with edf + Chinas nuclear power white elephant

Now projected to cost the UK taxpayer at least £30B

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36925580

 

When building the replacement PWR3 reactors for nuclear subs is only £3B each

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_PWR

 

So if we ger RR to build them, That should either save money or result in more work and better builds., or both.

 

That would ensure work for those that would have been working on tridents out of date before it would be finished subs and save the UK taxpayer £205B, which would cover the Brexit £122B with at least £80B left over for some worthwhile infrastructure expenditure ....

 

Speaking of which - dump HS2 - the idiots can work remotely over an improved network infrastructure form home, saving on all the travel time, congestion, destruction of farmalnd and polution. Meaning the projected £56B could be spent on affordable housing with all the jobs etc that goes with that.

 

 

Sorted - whether we leave the EU or not.

 

Then get the London Banks to pay their taxes

The £1B plus per annum would either pay for the required Brexit admin twice over, or just once with half a billion left over for the NHS or social care.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's the reverse of that.

A smaller economy with higher costs will have to cut costs

 

Lets start with edf + Chinas nuclear power white elephant

Now projected to cost the UK taxpayer at least £30B

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36925580

 

When building the replacement PWR3 reactors for nuclear subs is only £3B each

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_PWR

 

So if we ger RR to build them, That should either save money or result in more work and better builds., or both.

 

That would ensure work for those that would have been working on tridents out of date before it would be finished subs and save the UK taxpayer £205B, which would cover the Brexit £122B with at least £80B left over for some worthwhile infrastructure expenditure ....

 

Speaking of which - dump HS2 - the idiots can work remotely over an improved network infrastructure form home, saving on all the travel time, congestion, destruction of farmalnd and polution. Meaning the projected £56B could be spent on affordable housing with all the jobs etc that goes with that.

 

 

Sorted - whether we leave the EU or not.

 

Then get the London Banks to pay their taxes

The £1B plus per annum would either pay for the required Brexit admin twice over, or just once with half a billion left over for the NHS or social care.

 

This would make too much sense in politics.

That's why anyone would vote for you as pm, unfortunately you're not part of the elite (or are you???)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what would have happened if in 1966 after England won the world cup, they were told that the result wasn't good and they had to play best of 3...

 

If they had been caught cheating as the Brexit campaign has been caught, they should expect to be disqualified - not just play again.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what would have happened if in 1966 after England won the world cup, they were told that the result wasn't good and they had to play best of 3...

 

 

This really is an inadequate argument and a complete waste of pixels as that wouldn't have happened and nor will it in the referendum. Get a grip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its good that you agree with that. the point there is 'sorted - whether we leave the eu or not'. ie nothing to do with (not) being in the eu. :)

 

:)

Not entirely correct Ford

 

The post say 'smaller economy and higher costs' + the not insignificant £122B + £0.5B clearly identified (so far) purely Brexit costs ..

 

So if we weren't 'Bereaving' that would already be + £123B for tax relief/infrastructure/job creation/debt reduction expenditure plus the monetary benefits of larger economy + lower costs ON TOP of my peoples budget re-alignment of expenditure and priorities

 

.. but I did try to make it as neutral as possible.

 

Although of course that £122B Brexit cost is flagged by the Tories as an increase in UK debt - at at least +16% cost as UK debt is of course in dollars. - which adds a further £18,5B to the loan costs

Edited by tobyjugg2
..

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brexit cost is unknown. These are only predictions and the futute is uncertain. Not good for businesses to make plans.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brexit cost is unknown. These are only predictions and the futute is uncertain. Not good for businesses to make plans.

 

My next years council tax is 'unknown' from that perspective unclebulgaria, but I can make some pretty accurate predictions, which barring nuclear war or the greens suddenly winning a snap general election will be quite accurate.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a pretty good idea that the brexit cost, while unknown will be considerable be that in the short or medium term and probably the long term as well. Of course asking what the long term is , is a bit like asking how long is a piece of string.

 

Just a point on HS2 , maybe, just maybe , it will help to reduce the inequalities of the north south divide although I suspect that it will be so expensive to travel on it that only the rich will use it ..and we know that trickle down effect does not work, the only thing that flows downhill is S**t

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be very surprised if Brexit happens, unless the EU falls apart.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be very surprised if Brexit happens, unless the EU falls apart.

 

I truly hope you are right but sadly so much damage has already been done

 

I believe that the government have recently announced that EU students can still come next year and be assured of their place and fees for the duration of their course

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well isn't it hotting up! The referendum being challenged. You see the thing is, to repeat myself, there were problems with our relationship with the EU which triggered a ref so how will those problems be resolved. They've had a long time to sort it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 998 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...