Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the only one away with the faries is the one who think companies pay for sending emails and “fuel” jk
    • Post Office worried about optics of employing 'aggressive' City firm in Bates litigation, hears public inquiry | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK General counsel Jane MacLeod said City firm would make Post Office seem like corporate bullies.  
    • Hi All Could really do with some advice whislt return from a stressful hospital visit to my mother i was caught speeding doing 46 in a 40 mph limit, i should have known better i knew the camera was there but visit was very stressful and i switched off, totally my fault the date of the speeding was 13/11/2023 so by the time i received the letter i accepted my indescetion and filled in all the required details on the 20/11/2023 having a clean license hoping  to the speed awareness course. With all still ongoing with my mothers ongoing illness i left it at that and waited on reply but i did not receive anything until 01/05/2024 when i received a return to sender letter with the NIP opened inside and ta sticker with a tick on refused, on 02/05/2024 i then received a Single notice procedure in the post for the speeding and failure to provide information i need to reply asap now because with everything going on i not sent back i have 21 days and can plead online but my question is what do i do /fill in on the form i have not had this before and it's very stressfull on top of everything else going on. i really do not feel as if i have done anything wrong (i have checked everything on form and the address and sent well within timescale) but now i face filling a form in of which i have no idea and do not now what to please either, i will have to fill in the online form soon or will pass deadline so any advice would be greatly appreciated
    • I guess I just have to wait and keep my fingers crossed then that the judge sees them for what they are and strikes it out!  It’s really unfair that these solicitors are allowed to miss deadlines and still get permission to proceed. Like I said, they did exactly the same trick on the set aside hearing! 
    • urban myth sadly. it is only written off on their books and as they say, a balance still, legally, does exist. you most probably didnt owe the whole balance anyway as unlawful penalty fees and the the interest they accrue typically inflate a debt to a much greater level. your saving grace here is this was to the original creditor and the fact you've had a default notice sometime vack? so regardless to whatever happens, the debt will vanish from your credit file on the DN's 6th B'day. though that doesnt mean a debt is still not owed and that it wont be sold on. just keep that letter from BC safe. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If Mr Cameron could have delivered the deals wanted by the UK Government in the time before the referendum, the people of the UK would have had more confidence as to our role and significance within the EU, and you probably wouldn't be having this debate now, and that was with a threat of leaving. Sounds like the member states are not interested in what we want. If the negotiations fell apart then, why would anything change now. There was always something fundamentally wrong or referendums wouldn't have been raised in the first place.

 

If they couldn't sell it then I can't see how they could sell it again Uncle B that's my thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it as a compliment and I don't mind you put me in a box titled 'elite'!

 

It's not illegal to not exercise my right to vote or other rights. I didn't participate in general nor local elections. My reason is that I will be fine with both options, but I believe that others will face many obstacles with Brexit vote in the future. This however doesn't mean that I don't have valid points to make or should stay just silent as you implicated in your post.

 

Can somebody help to explain to king12345 the difference between illeagal immigrants, assylym seakers (having nothing to do with the EU) and EU citizens who are in the UK legally? I've attempted on more occassions but it seems to me this basic difference is not clear to some Brexiters.

 

It's very sad and unfair to vote for Brexit because of illegal immigration because illegal immigrants have nothing to do with EU citizens. It's like operate heart when you have problems with your stomach, no wonder patient is going to die!

 

The one who doesn't understand the basic concepts of life is you, not the brexitiers.

You think to be the sharpest tool in the box, but you can't even read 2 lines without losing concentration.

We, the brexitiers, know exactly the difference between illegal immigrants, asylum seekers and EU citizens.

The fact that I made a comment mentioning illegal immigrants, doesn't mean that i think EU citizens are illegally coming in UK.

I probably speak for everyone else here on cag and possibly the majority in the real world when I say that you have no right to call brexitiers "ignorant".

We got up in the morning on the day, went to the polling station and expressed our preference, fulfilling the civil duty of good citizens.

You and many others decided to sink your derriere on the sofa, watching Jeremy Kyle.

Now you arrogantly want to call us stupid.

As far as i am concerned, the moment you decided that voting was for losers and "stupids", you gave up your right to complain or even comment on the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one who doesn't understand the basic concepts of life is you, not the brexitiers.

You think to be the sharpest tool in the box, but you can't even read 2 lines without losing concentration.

We, the brexitiers, know exactly the difference between illegal immigrants, asylum seekers and EU citizens.

The fact that I made a comment mentioning illegal immigrants, doesn't mean that i think EU citizens are illegally coming in UK.

I probably speak for everyone else here on cag and possibly the majority in the real world when I say that you have no right to call brexitiers "ignorant".

We got up in the morning on the day, went to the polling station and expressed our preference, fulfilling the civil duty of good citizens.

You and many others decided to sink your derriere on the sofa, watching Jeremy Kyle.

Now you arrogantly want to call us stupid.

As far as i am concerned, the moment you decided that voting was for losers and "stupids", you gave up your right to complain or even comment on the matter.

 

You are personally atacking me, it was Laura who pointed out to ignorance of Brexiters by starting thread, I even never used word 'stupid'. You made bunch of false allegations so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a general rant and includes Brexit as well, how I see it is we have had a vote, the people have spoken, this is called democracy, what do people want ??, in out in out shake it all about, personally I think some people don't know what that want..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't that mean that the 48% are still entitled to an opinion though? It's still not far off half the country.

 

HB

 

It is less then half the people that voted which is less then the majority and the point of voting is you go with the majority, how is it possible any other way ?..

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is less then half the people that voted which is less then the majority and the point of voting is you go with the majority, how is it possible any other way ?..

 

I'm not arguing with that, I'm just saying that people who voted to remain are still entitled to express their opinions after the vote.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opinion as well is great but once the argument has been decided through the ballot box, do we keeping re running the vote until those that shout the loudest get there way, their must come a time where those that lost hold up there hands and accept that in life no one can have there own way all of the time..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look, however you might dislike EU telling the UK what laws it has to comply with, it will always come down to economics. It is too early to tell whether Brexits economic implications are so bad that any independence gained by leaving the EU is not worth it.

 

IF it starts to look like Brexit will cause severe damage to the economy and Government faced impossible decisions e.g cutting pensions, reducing NHS spending, then you can bet that public opinion will start to change. Government can't ignore what the public are saying and just plough on based on one non binding referendum vote.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who's Jeremy Kyle ? :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...