Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Whitsend.

 

We have all spent a lot of time advising you on the forum and despite your thread running to over 8 pages, we are still questioning the proper status of your business. This is an area that I would also suggest that you spend a few days looking into.

 

Yes glad that it was not only me that was confused about this.

 

Also has there been any attempt of enforcment at your home ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well if it stops you all moaning it was a suggestion to split the thread into a discussion thread.....:|

 

Which was decided it was not required...so now I will remove further off topic posts.

 

Have I missed something?

 

No moaning from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have I missed something?

 

No moaning from me.

 

:lol:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have I missed something?

 

No moaning from me.

 

So if the if it stops "YOU ALL MOANING" then surely it was correct to bring the subject up.

 

Anyway as I am sure this post will be removed, regards to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has loads of good advice for the OP and it is now for her to address the Notice of Enforcement and sort out an Income & Expenditure and the slight discrepancy regarding 'self-employment' etc.

 

I will refrain from posting until the OP returns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought we had agreed to stop the tit for tat Dodge...the above is senseless to the OP only to the person you intend to keep this argument up with. ..

 

Unapproved.as its pointless.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Off Topic post unapproved

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whitsend.

 

We have all spent a lot of time advising you on the forum and despite your thread running to over 8 pages, we are still questioning the proper status of your business. This is an area that I would also suggest that you spend a few days looking into.

 

On the one hand, you state that the goods in the building belong to a Limited Company. If that is so, then the items should be exempt from seizure. Your accountant should have a list of assets and the total value would appear on your yearly accounts (assuming accounts are filed).

 

You have said that you trade as a sole trader (despite being a Director of the Limited Company). If you trade from the premises as a sole trader.....then yes, the new enforcement company can visit you at that address. You will need to provide evidence that the items that you use are owned by the Limited Company.

 

As mentioned earlier, you have now been given another opportunity to deal with your council tax arrears and it is for you to ensure that this time, you respond to the Notice of Enforcement from the third enforcement company.

 

I have never said I am a sole trader, I stated my company was a limited company. It was someone else who suggested Ii was a sole trader. Please let me know where you think I said that. I stated my company was limited with 2 directors.

 

If you read my posts you will see from the beginning that my problem was that I did not receive any notices at home. They council didn't even get my correct business address, so I nearly didn't get this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not understand the descrepancy. Yes I am the Director of a Limited Company. But I am also self employed.

 

Does your Ltd Co pay you a salary/wage or do you only accept a dividend once a year? If you are paid a salary/wage then you are classed as an employee of your Ltd Co and therefore could be subject to an Attachment of Earnings. As for any goods then providing you have receipts etc then these belong to your Ltd Co and should not be available for seizure as they could be classed as third party goods - they may only seize goods belonging to the debtor. Hope you can now see why establishment of your status is important.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never said I am a sole trader, I stated my company was a limited company. It was someone else who suggested Ii was a sole trader. Please let me know where you think I said that. I stated my company was limited with 2 directors.

 

If you read my posts you will see from the beginning that my problem was that I did not receive any notices at home. They council didn't even get my correct business address, so I nearly didn't get this one.

 

Whitsend,

 

It is usually the case that a person who elects to be 'self employed' is considered to be a sole trader. Plodddertom has made a good post above and you may wish to glance over the following short blog on the subject.

 

http://ihorizon.co.uk/self-employed-limited-company/

 

As difficult as it may be, it would be best if you put the past few weeks behind.

 

As predicted, the local authority have passed your account to a third enforcement company. The difference this time, is that this new company will have access to updated notes from the local authority about your business etc. It is for this reason, that I suggested that you spend some time getting documentation together to prove ownership. You need to also get an Income & Expenditure drafted.

 

You are now about to be given another opportunity to set up a payment arrangement by responding to the Notice of Enforcement. As soon as you receive that letter please post back on the forum. As long as you deal with the letter within the 'compliance stage', bailiff fees will be capped at just £75.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes as an employee of a limited company you are not "working for yourself" or "self employed" as confusing as it may sound.

 

Did they give the name of the new bailiff company ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where has it been stated that the account has been passsed to a third enforcement company? I thought Whitsend had received a letter from a second enforcement company stating the account would be returned within seven days (not to be taken literally) if full payment or contact was not made.

 

This is significant, as without going through the entire issue again, once the account is returned, there is a window of opportunity to make a payment with no fees added, and to put a solid repayment proposal to the council, with your I&E attached, and a letter as per my previous post. There is a fair chance this would be accepted.

 

Is this an avenue you want to pursue?

 

If not, then we are all going to be advising exactly the same thing, so it would be helpful to know.

 

If you (or someone else) could clarify where it has been stated this has been passsed to a third enforcement company, this would be helpful. However, even if it has, there is no obligation to deal with the bailiffs, and it is possible to sit it out again and wait for it to be returned, once again, to the council, at which stage any fees will die as per post 2!!! (I underline it purely to mention the word 'possible' - I'm neither recommending nor not recommending this route, purely outlining your options).

 

160 posts ago, I outlined the exact same option.

 

Whether it is worth it for the sake of £75 is something only you can decide - if it were me, I probably wouldn't bother, but it isn't me.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone is unsure about the OPs situation regarding the debt surely the best thing to do is ask the OP,.

Edited by Andyorch
edited

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes as an employee of a limited company you are not "working for yourself" or "self employed" as confusing as it may sound.

 

Did they give the name of the new bailiff company ?

 

Yes I am, as the Director pay goes through PAYE, but other invoiced duties do not. As the other invoiced items are maintainance and the administration of building renovation, they do not come under the duties as part of my role as a director, and have to be invoiced and declared on a tax return.

 

Please note I was visited May 2014 by HMRC, who checked this and agreed that this was correctly done. These duties would normally be carried out by a private contractor. I also occasionally have to invoice part of the electrical work done to the owner of the building, this work is carried out by me, not my limited company and again has to be declared on a tax return. This is all done by an accountant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am, as the Director pay goes through PAYE, but other invoiced duties do not. As the other invoiced items are maintainance and the administration of building renovation, they do not come under the duties as part of my role as a director, and have to be invoiced and declared on a tax return.

 

Thank you for posting back.

 

It would seem to me (and please do ask your accountant) that the local authority could apply for an Attachment of Earnings order against your Limited Company in respect of your salary through the company.

 

This would not affect any self employed income and would only apply to your salary through the Limited Company.

 

If an attachment were applied for, the Limited Company MUST obey the terms of the order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whitsend,

 

As you appear to be around, please could you answer:

 

Has your account already been passed to a third company for enforcement, or have you just received the letter saying it was going to be returned from the second enforcement company?

 

Depending on your answer to the above, there may be further questions, but it would be good to clarify that first please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am, as the Director pay goes through PAYE, but other invoiced duties do not. As the other invoiced items are maintainance and the administration of building renovation, they do not come under the duties as part of my role as a director, and have to be invoiced and declared on a tax return.

 

Please note I was visited May 2014 by HMRC, who checked this and agreed that this was correctly done. These duties would normally be carried out by a private contractor. I also occasionally have to invoice part of the electrical work done to the owner of the building, this work is carried out by me, not my limited company and again has to be declared on a tax return. This is all done by an accountant.

 

Thanks for this, Ba has this covered in her response.

 

Unfortunately, in order for an attachment of earnings to be applied the bailiff activity would have to cease, as only one enforcment method can be used at the same time.

 

There are a number of ways this can be done, if you think this i an alternative worth pursuing.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may or may not have various options, but a lot now depends on the issue of whether or not the following statement is, actually, the case:

 

"As predicted, the local authority have passed your account to a third enforcement company."

 

This is a critical issue to have an answer to now, as pretty much everything else now depends on whether or not this is the case. We need clarification.

 

It would be really helpful if you could answer this one question:

 

Has your account already been passed to a third company for enforcement, or have you just received the letter saying it was going to be returned from the second enforcement company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whitsend,

 

As you appear to be around, please could you answer:

 

Has your account already been passed to a third company for enforcement, or have you just received the letter saying it was going to be returned from the second enforcement company?

 

Depending on your answer to the above, there may be further questions, but it would be good to clarify that first please.

 

A letter was sent last week, saying the account was being sent back to the council within 7 days, I rang the council iniially to complain about them sending letters to the wrong company, they told me they had gone for another liability order for this years council tax as well and that it would go out to another enforcement company. They refused let me make a repayment plan with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So with regard to post 165, you do receive a regular monthly salary from which an Attachment of Earnings could be made?

 

No, I do not, I often am not able to pay my salary. Last year my directors earnings were less than 2500.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council are aware of my earnings as I applied for help with my council tax late last year, which they said I was entitled to, but my self employed earnings made it very difficult and it went on and on, with me keep sending information over and over again. Eventually I gave up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...