Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So as I stated, I posted my letter off but over 2 weeks later I've had a visit from one of their reps. I didn't indulge him in any conversation, and I just stated that any such debts are statute-barred and closed the door on him. I was hoping they'd take notice of the letter. Where do I go from here? Thanks
    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The European Union.....In or Out?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2897 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What hasn't even been mentioned but should have been is the Human Rights Act.

 

In my (very humble) opinion, if a person from overseas burgles a house and gets sentenced, the homeowner has suffered a breach of their article 8 rights. The offender (IMO) should not be able to use that aspect of the HRA to claim a right to stay in this country

 

You breach a right, you lose the equivalent.

 

Other countries manage to stay within Human Rights law and deport foreign criminals. I seem to France having a problem with one individual. They were put in front of a Judge and within a few hours they were on a plane out of the country.

 

The problems that the UK has are nothing to do with EU or ECHR. On many cases where cases have been brought before ECHR, the Judges have said that the UK parliament needs to change their legislation so it makes the position totally clear. You cannot blame human rights laws for British politicians being rubbish at passing legislation that is clear and cannot be subject to interpretation which was not intended.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Interesting that people want the universal human rights, but dont want to give them to 'immigrant' workers.

 

Looking at the bigger picture.

The UK leaves:

Scotland breaks from the UK and rejoins the EU

Britain loses a large chunck of it buying power

Britain loses the current Trident option as the waters will become 'Scottish - a confirmed non-nuclear power

Britain pretty much becomes the city of London.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following this thread as things heat up.

Very interesting times.

Some news released a while ago.

EU referendum: June 23 date announced by David Cameron as he declares Britain will be 'stronger and safer' with EU deal not Brexit - live

Prime Minister announces EU referendum will be held on June 23 but cabinet ministers Michael Gove, John Whittingdale, Priti Patel, Theresa Villiers, Chris Grayling and Iain Duncan Smith all back Brexit - latest updates.

Wonder where Boris stands on this.In or out.

Quote-

Boris Johnson will come off the fence in the European referendum battle on Friday — and a new poll reveals he could be a game-changer in the historic vote.

 

The Mayor’s promise to say which side he is on came as an Ipsos MORI survey showed one in three people regard him as “important” to deciding whether they vote In or Out.

 

Speculation that he will put his weight behind David Cameron’s campaign to remain in a reformed EU grew after he pledged to “make everything abundantly clear by the end of the week”.

Is his view that important.

What do you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff

You say workers protection won't end if we leave because you don't believe parliament won't debate it. If that's the case I.e parliament, especially a tory one, won't debate moves that curtail workers rights, how did the qualifying period gor unfair dismissal change from one to two years. Now that is an erosion of workers rights.

 

If you follow the capitalist argument of ever increasing efficiency and profit there will come a time when laws if diminishing returns kick in and capitalism fails.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following this thread as things heat up.

 

Wonder where Boris stands on this.In or out.

Quote-

Boris Johnson will come off the fence in the European referendum battle on Friday — and a new poll reveals he could be a game-changer in the historic vote.

 

The Mayor’s promise to say which side he is on came as an Ipsos MORI survey showed one in three people regard him as “important” to deciding whether they vote In or Out.

 

Speculation that he will put his weight behind David Cameron’s campaign to remain in a reformed EU grew after he pledged to “make everything abundantly clear by the end of the week”.

Is his view that important.

What do you think.

 

He has been rather coy hasn't he ? I guess he will weigh up what he will get out of any decision he makes - I doubt the UK citizenry will figure in his thoughts.

 

I rather suspect it will get a lot warmer as time marches on, TO :lol:

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget that we have actually got NOTHING.

 

The EU wont be voting on these proposals until AFTER the referendum and could amend them even further from their current feeble state or even throw them all out.

 

The text.

http://www.politico.eu/article/full-text-of-deal-changing-britain-eu-membership-brexit-referendum/

 

 

Camerons speech says he believes we should change/reform it from within.

- This proves we have NO real say and no hope of treaty change.

 

Camerons speech says he believes we would be better in a reformed Europe.

- Quite possibly but this proves that isn't going to happen.

 

 

It seems clear that if we stay in Europe it will be as an increasingly marginalised member.

 

The choice seems to be leave now, and risk the break up of both the EU and the UK depending which occurs first.

or stay in the EU with less and less relevance as a marginalised member.

 

Given Merkels handling of the migrant crisis, I think a break up or major change of the EU is unavoidable.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please list the pros and cons of staying in the EU and leaving it? I am totally confused!

 

Hi Sparks.

I am sure many articles will be written between now and June.But to start things off one article.

I personally will be unbiased throughout.But want to know a lot more.

Perhaps the greatest uncertainty associated with leaving the EU is that no country has ever done it before, so no one can predict the exact result. Nevertheless, many have tried.

What would happen if the vote was held tomorrow?

The latest polls show public opinion over Britain's future in Europe remains on a knife-edge. An online survey from ICM says 43 per cent want to remain and 39 per cent would opt to leave, while Ipsos Mori's latest poll showed 54 per cent would vote In and 36 per cent Out.

EU referendum

EU referendum: pros and cons of Britain leaving Europe

Feb 20, 2016

A vote on the UK's membership of the European Union will be held on 23 June

http://www.theweek.co.uk/eu-referendum

 

And the famous polls.The latest i could find.As David Cameron headed to Brussells.

http://www.theweek.co.uk/eu-referendum/65461/eu-referendum-polls-remain-tight-as-cameron-heads-to-brussels

 

And another one.

A "poll of polls", based on the average share of the vote for In and Out in the six most recent surveys, shows the two sides are neck and neck, with 52 per cent in the "remain" camp and 48 per cent wanting to leave. This marks a one-point change since Monday in favour of staying in the EU.

 

I hope there are many others about to enlighten us more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I noticed that Angela Merkel was implying that they too would be thinking to apply the same formula to child benefits as the UK

 

I think she personally is worried about her position as German citizens are beginning to moan loud and clear about the amount of immigration !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the following statement from Michael Gove, the Justice secretary says it all for me. Too many decisions are made by un elected officials.

 

For weeks now I have been wrestling with the most difficult decision of my political life. But taking difficult decisions is what politicians are paid to do. No-one is forced to stand for Parliament, no-one is compelled to become a minister.

 

If you take on those roles, which are great privileges, you also take on big responsibilities. I was encouraged to stand for Parliament by David Cameron and he has given me the opportunity to serve in what I believe is a great, reforming Government. I think he is an outstanding Prime Minister. There is, as far as I can see, only one significant issue on which we have differed. And that is the future of the UK in the European Union.

It pains me to have to disagree with the Prime Minister on any issue.

 

My instinct is to support him through good times and bad. But I cannot duck the choice which the Prime Minister has given every one of us. In a few months’ time we will all have the opportunity to decide whether Britain should stay in the European Union or leave. I believe our country would be freer, fairer and better off outside the EU. And if, at this moment of decision, I didn’t say what I believe I would not be true to my

convictions or my country.

 

I don’t want to take anything away from the Prime Minister’s dedicated efforts to get a better deal for Britain. He has negotiated with courage and tenacity. But I think Britain would be stronger outside the EU.

 

My starting point is simple. I believe that the decisions which govern all our lives, the laws we must all obey and the taxes we must all pay should be decided by people we choose and who we can throw out if we want change. If power is to be used wisely, if we are to avoid corruption and complacency in high office, then the public must have the right to change laws and Governments at election time. But our membership of the

European Union prevents us being able to change huge swathes of law and stops us being able to choose who makes critical decisions which affect all our lives.

 

Laws which govern citizens in this country are decided by politicians from other nations who we never elected and can’t throw out. We can take out our anger on elected representatives in Westminster but whoever is in Government in London cannot remove or reduce VAT, cannot support a steel plant through troubled times, cannot build the houses we need where they’re needed and cannot deport all the individuals who shouldn’t be in this country. I believe that needs to change. And I believe that both the lessons of our past and the shape of the future make the case for change compelling."

 

 

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-35601369

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My big fear is that xenophobia may take over this referendum

 

I am not all together comfortable with some of the rules that the EU come up with but we are stronger with more clout and safer as part of a larger union. We are pledged to support and protect each other

 

I think whatever happens the EU can not carry on being run by bureacrats because bureaucracy is a dangerous thing and gaining agreement from so many diverse countries all with their own political agenda may be difficult but it is a prize worth fighting for .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I noticed that Angela Merkel was implying that they too would be thinking to apply the same formula to child benefits as the UK

 

I think she personally is worried about her position as German citizens are beginning to moan loud and clear about the amount of immigration !

 

|Its more that the benefits 'related to the workers country' is there for everyone, not just the UK and that it is optional to apply it,

 

So Poland could choose not to pay the higher UK rate to UK workers in Poland, and just continue paying any Polish rate or lack thereof.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

A summary

http://www.politico.eu/article/david-cameron-eu-reform-deal-scorecard-brexit-eu-referendum-agreement/

 

(and DONT forget that even these feeble proposals could be thrown out by the EU on the EU vote on it AFTER our referendum)

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

too had thought he was (eventually) after the leadership, and given that most con mp's seem to be 'in'...or are they?

fair play though re not toeing the (party) line

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

We have got an 'emergency protection' for the City of London. That should help those in power and big business to make up their mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should keep an eye on the number of provable lies each side tells in its campaign and vote for the one that tells the least. Not sure if repeating "the unknown" counts as a lie because some of us are old enough to remember life before the EU and even the EEC. Like all political ideas there are good and bad points to it all. Hitler did legislate on noise pollution control and that legislation is still on the German statute books and in the UK emergency powers were introduced in 1798 to create an income tax and as yet it is still an emergency legislation, being extended for the Crimean War, Irish famine, WW1 etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2897 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...