Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3037 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For serious disciplinary such as dimisissal some company have a second appeal state. Does this one?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To be honest, he needs to clear his name. The industry he works in needs a checkable history and "dismissed" means he cannot get another job without losing up to £12k a year. It's not just about the money. He has been told his reference will say dismissed and has already been turned down for jobs because of it.

 

I am confused because you aso say he was given the opportunity to resign instead?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, at the appeal outcome but they wouldn't elaborate on the reference he'd get or if he'd get one at all. Until we get the outcome letter, we won't know. And he has been without work for 3 months in the meantime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am afraid if he chose not to resign, then it looks like an ET, with uncertain outcome, or a change of career. I hope your solicitor things the ET prospects are good, as you may be able to come to an out of court arrangement sooner if they are.

 

I'm sorry I have no better ideas.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just don't understand their appeal process or if they've done this correctly. Their policy is not very clear but common sense says if they've reinvestigated then he should have had the chance to respond to new evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. But given you know 100% they are not going to play fair, you need to think about your options from there. You cannot *make* people be nice or fair.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, but they are a very well known high profile company who win awards for best place to work etc. I don't think they'll want the bad publicity.

 

I don't want to put a downer on you, but this kind of case doesn't get publicity. ETs pretty much never hit the headlines unless they change the law (like holiday pay for zero hours workers, etc).

 

You need to work out the options for moving on from this, not "punishing" the employer. You, and your family, matter most.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure. So efforts go into things that affect employability way before concepts of "revenge"

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all,

 

I have to get a schedule of loss prepared by tomorrow but I have been unable to get an appointment at the CAB. Part of the claim is discrimination and I know about Vento scales but is that the only compensation you claim for discrimination or is the Vento injury to feeling in addition? I am struggling to find anything online to confirm!

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

depends on the circumstances, did you leave the employment over this matter or is it purely for Vento. If the latter then put what you think is reasonable so if it was a one-off matter then £1000 would be reasonable. Put nothing and you might be awarded a pound.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually for my husband. He was accused of aggression against a female colleague. It was actually her being aggressive and using the fact that she was senior PA to a director (and the directors name) to intimidate him into letting her break H&S rules. No investigation was carried out because they took her statement as read and did not not interview her. Did not view CCTV or interview witnesses expect the one male colleague my husband mentioned! He was summarily dismissed and appeal upheld even though they admitted his body language was passive. They said she was upset not angry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then the schedule of loss will be the expected salary from the time of the event until he got a new job or even longer then that if he was forced to take a new job with a lower salary. the courts like to see mitigation of the losses and evidence that your hubby did his best to sort the matter out as fast as possible by appealing their decision, applying for new jobs etc.

Did he report the matter to the HSE?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is retail so the local authority and they did not want to know! They said they'd investigate if there's an accident.

 

He has taken another job, contract work at approx £9k a year less (unless he works 60hrs/wk).

 

He did appeal but the appeal panel were misled by those involved. They also interviewed the complainants but did not let him comment on any of the issues raised by the interviews. It was neither a re-hearing or a review!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all. Hopefully you can answer this.

 

We have just received the respondents list of documents. They have made a mistake in that they refer to a policy in the disciplinary pack that I was not given. It was quite a big thing and an integral part of the reason we going to tribunal. Do I tell them of the mistake?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Numerous threads merged for history

Please keep to one thread

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Further to the previous posts, we have the tribunal date set and in the process of collating the information for the witness statement. The Bundle is due to be sent to me next week.

 

When writing this, should we include all the issues we have found in the disclosure list? What I mean is "show our hand" so to speak? They have disclosed a lot of emails that's actually incriminate their own staff which they must realise. These questions will be raised at the tribunal but I am wondering if I put these in to the statement.

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to raise it at the Tribunal, put it in your statement.

 

You are required to "show your hand" - that is the purpose of requiring exchange of witness statements before the hearing. You would normally only exchange your witness statements once the other side has confirmed that they are ready, and you then both send the statements to each other at the same time.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

can anyone help with a query about a hearing?

 

We have a key witness to our case and he is willing to give evidence. He no longer works for the company and has a new job.

 

Can we apply to the tribunal to give a day when he will give evidence? The judge has allowed four days and I don't want him to have to take all those days off, although he has said he will if necessary.

 

Regards,

 

L

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...