Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlady keeps hinting she wants us out - for NO reason.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3244 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Our Landlady has constantly dropped hints that this 3 bedroom house should be for a family not a couple so my Mrs and I are looking for somewhere else (daughter left home).

 

Talking to Landlady yesterday she said she'd give us back the deposit 10 days after we leave. She's a tight bitch so I don't trust her.

 

1. Is that even legal?

2. Whose to say she wont just walk around the house making up stories to diddle us out of our deposit money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this even matter. If you are paying the rent and have a bona fide tenancy agreement you could have a 20 bedroom house.

Something smells here

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers everyone, great answers.

@SabreSheep : Couldn't agree more. I'm guessing she plans to hike the rent up big time for the next tenants

@sequenci : Yes it is in the deposit scheme, does that mean she's trying to take the ...?

@ashmak : Great idea, will do that thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have an AST or it has gone periodic, she has to give two clear months notice from a rent due date ( contract date ) by way of a S21 form.

similarly if it is PST then you have to give her one months clear notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LL is legally entitled to withhold deposit for a reasonable time after end of T, to allow detailed move out inspection without Ts contents present, and time to communicate decision to DPS. DPS regard 10 days as 'a reasonable time'.

LL may try to embellish report, hence you have recourse to dispute procedure, with the onus of proof very much on LL.

that's why deposit schemes were brought in - to protect the T from unscrupulous LLs

There are also devious Ts as well as LLs!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats why you use an inventory and video camera. U film everything when u move in and check inventory off.

 

When you move out you reverse the process.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

We've lived in this private rented house for almost 4 years now without any issues whatsoever, we look after it and have only ever had cause to contact our landlady - when the shower sprung a leak.

 

When we moved in the rent was £625, it's crept up to £650 and when she told us a couple of months ago that she wants to put it up to £700 a month I told her we'd need to move (I didn't give notice, just an off the cuff comment)...she came around the next day with a reference!!!!

 

Since then, she contacts me perhaps once a month to 'say hello' and always ends her text/email/unscheduled visit with a note asking if we've found anywhere yet. We feel pressured to move out and can't believe this is legal?????????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps she is concerned that you will suddenly up sticks and leave after your comment about having to move ?

 

Might be worth letter her know that it was an off the cuff remark to the rent going up - however, £700.00 a month for a house doesn't sound too expensive from what I hear !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've lived in this private rented house for almost 4 years now without any issues whatsoever, we look after it and have only ever had cause to contact our landlady - when the shower sprung a leak.

 

When we moved in the rent was £625, it's crept up to £650 and when she told us a couple of months ago that she wants to put it up to £700 a month I told her we'd need to move (I didn't give notice, just an off the cuff comment)...she came around the next day with a reference!!!!

 

Since then, she contacts me perhaps once a month to 'say hello' and always ends her text/email/unscheduled visit with a note asking if we've found anywhere yet. We feel pressured to move out and can't believe this is legal?????????????

 

Take No notice of her and just carry on with your lives, sounds like she just wants you to move out at no cost to her !

 

If she does want possession back of your home and you don't want to move out, she the will have to follow correct legal process

 

Read on

 

http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/private_renting/private_renting_agreements/assured_shorthold_tenancies

 

Enjoy the BHW.

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is an unsubstantiateiated assumption 45002.

A gradual rent increase of £75 over 4yr,on initial rent of £625 represents ~2.5% pa(prob in line with CPI & LLs increased costs. Assuming rent is £700 pcm, that is below the average UK rent. (regional diff apply)

LL does not require reason to issue s21 Notice, but no such Notice has been served, so her current interest is prob related to OPs 'off the cuff' response to proposed rent increase.

LL could just serve s13 for proposed increase and if OP duly contests, the adjudged 'fair' rent would be binding on botjfor next 12 months.

Any proposal is open to negotiation, without resorting to Law as the first option. IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what is being said, your LA normally has an officer for fair rents so you may want to ask them what they deem as a fair rent in your area..

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably best to open with LL, if you want to stay, and discuss the rent.

she may want security as well, that you are going to stay; and maybe agree to sign a new contract for a slightly higher rent, say £675 ( negotiate ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I posted about this here before and have kept the same thread title in case you're interested.

 

Ok, short story is we mentioned to our Landlady last year that we'll need to move as the rent is high; since then she's been what I would call pressuring us into getting out - she gave us references the day after we'd talked, emails me regularly dropping hints.

Here's the one I got today:

 

Is this LEGAL????

 

 

 

 

Hi

 

Just wondering whether you had a chance to talk to Claire about your future plans?

 

My understanding from previous conversations we have had is as follows:

 

Claire would like to move nearer to work

Claire's daughter is 18 in August, which has a financial implication

You both feel the rent is too high

 

From what you have said, I am concerned that come August you might be struggling to pay the rent, which will be a stressful situation all round. If you need to find a cheaper place it would be better to do it sooner rather than later, as rents are going up across the board. You can look on rightmove and gumtree and I guess other places to see what you could get for less than £650, perhaps nearer to Claire’s workplace.

 

I am happy to pop over and have a chat about it, if that would help. I am free all day tomorrow, if that would be any good for you?

 

Kind regards

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd reply with a simple

 

'If and when we are ready to move we will give you the appropriate notice as required in our tenancy agreement. At the moment we have no plans to move out'.

 

Should get her off your back.

 

It appears she's trying to establish facts, as I think (in passing) you said you'd have to move if the rents were put up, but until you give your legal notice she shouldn't be contacting you like this.

She can of course serve you notice anyway, which she can do at anytime.

Hope this helps, sorry if a little direct but she's been behaving like this for a while and you really need to stop her to get some peace and quiet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

#OP, why do you think LL letter may be illegal? It appears to offer sensible advice and a one-off letter does not constitute harassment.

Though if dau does turn 18 soon, she should be able to contribute and relieve your rent concerns.

All LL is doing is trying to ascertain your intentions for end of fixed term, when you are allowed to vacate on last day, without Notice. Good advice for any LL approaching end of fixed term IMO. Some Notice would be a courtesy if you want a LL ref.

Link to post
Share on other sites

three threads merged

please keep to one thread

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is an unsubstantiateiated assumption 45002.

A gradual rent increase of £75 over 4yr,on initial rent of £625 represents ~2.5% pa(prob in line with CPI & LLs increased costs. Assuming rent is £700 pcm, that is below the average UK rent. (regional diff apply)

LL does not require reason to issue s21 Notice, but no such Notice has been served, so her current interest is prob related to OPs 'off the cuff' response to proposed rent increase.

LL could just serve s13 for proposed increase and if OP duly contests, the adjudged 'fair' rent would be binding on botjfor next 12 months.

Any proposal is open to negotiation, without resorting to Law as the first option. IMO.

 

 

Thanks. First up, she's emailed us three times since I last posted, I asked Council about harassment and they said if they got involved she'd probably kick us out. Great help!

As for the rent, it's not a gradual increase, from £625 to £750 in one jump is hardly gradual..

If she were to put the rent up, do we have to agree/does she have to give us a new contract?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, until you have been served the correct notice to vacate you do NOT have to leave.

1..... are you in a fixed term agreement, or is is a periodic agreement, if fixed term can you give the start date as per your tenancy agreement.

2...... When you moved in did you have a inventory and do you have a copy.

3...... has the landlord served you the correct rent increase notice S13.

 

Dependent on these things a better answer can be given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

any increase, does not have to be via an S13, but you can ask for one, as it sets your rights etc.

No you do not have to accept but then you may get a S21 notice for repossession.

Yes if you accept then you should get a new contract with the new terms etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...