Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 14/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
    • According to Wikipedia - yeah, I know - the site is owned by Croydon Council. It's at least worth a try to contact the council and ask for a contact in The Colonnades. You could then lay it on thick about being a genuine customer and ask them to call their dogs off. It's got to be worth a try  https://www.croydon.gov.uk/contact-us/contact-us  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Weeds on my land...legal warning & effect on valuation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3359 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Around 12 years ago I bought a small plot of land in Wiltshire.

I bought the land from a company called Gladwish Land Sales.

 

I have renently been informed by Gladwish Land Sales that I must clear my land of weeds otherwise I will go to prison.

 

Being financially unable to clear the weeds as the land is many miles from my home and living on a very small pension,

I assume I will soon be in prison.

 

When I bought the land I never realised that I would become such a danger to the public that I may end up in prison.

 

Should this happen it will cost the tax payer around £600 per week to keep me in prison even though I pose no danger to anyone.

 

Has the law in this country gone bonkers I ask myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I must clear my land of weeds otherwise I will go to prison.

 

Which law is that based on?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

what kind of weed is this?

 

i am assuming it is japanese knotweed - in which case it is upto 2 years in prison! :???:

 

more info on this link: http://www.japaneseknotweedremoval.co.uk/japanese-knotweed-legislation-uk.html

 

You ask yourself if the law in this country has gone bonkers...

 

 

I would like to think that the law is there to protect people, but after reading some threads on CAG it could be seen to be bonkers.

 

If this weed is not Japanese Knotweed, then what is it?

 

 

Can you give more info as to what the weed actually is?

(I trust it is not marijuana weed!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must clear my land of weeds otherwise I will go to prison.

 

Which law is that based on?

 

Andy

 

a few different pieces of legislation, here: http://www.japaneseknotweedremoval.co.uk/japanese-knotweed-legislation-uk.html

 

if it is japanese knotweed, then it is classed as controlled waste, that probably means higher costs to dispose of it

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am almost sure that the ragwort also needs controlled waste disposal. probably they all require this.

 

sorry i can't be of any help to you.

 

you could look at maybe claiming the cost of removal from owners of neighboring land

if you can prove that their land was responsible for causing your land to have the weeds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defra issued this warning to Gladwish Land Sales who passed it onto me.

 

Formal enforcement under the weeds act will follow if I fail to kill the weeds.

 

Recently Gladwish told me that I will go to prison if I fail to comply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Around 12 years ago I bought a small plot of land in Wiltshire.

I bought the land from a company called Gladwish Land Sales.

 

I have renently been informed by Gladwish Land Sales that I must clear my land of weeds otherwise I will go to prison.

 

Being financially unable to clear the weeds as the land is many miles from my home and living on a very small pension,

I assume I will soon be in prison.

 

When I bought the land I never realised that I would become such a danger to the public that I may end up in prison.

 

Should this happen it will cost the tax payer around £600 per week to keep me in prison even though I pose no danger to anyone.

 

Has the law in this country gone bonkers I ask myself.

 

"Being financially unable to clear the weeds as the land is many miles from my home and living on a very small pension,

I assume I will soon be in prison."

 

Having identified 2 possible solutions (clear the weeds yourself, pay someone else to do so), you've presented them as an "either / or" and decided you face an impossibility.

 

There are (of course) other options.

For example, since you have an asset you can neither visit easily, nor care for adequately : sell the land.

You'll get less for it with the work that needs doing to it than if it was weed free, but you'll be free of the risk of prison.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I smell a problem here - googling Gladwish Land Sales comes up with almost nothing of note, but surely if you bought the land from them, YOU own the land and they have no further part to play in the matter - unless it is one of these 'buy greenbelt land as an investment' companies and you have been stung over the last 12 years.

 

Is this the right company http://gladwishlandsales.com/

 

How big is the bit of land in question?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weeds mentioned are common ragwort, creeping or field thistle, spear thistle, broad leaved dock.

 

 

Apparently they are all classed as injurious weeds under section 2 of the weeds act 1959.

 

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/7-8/54

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I smell a problem here - googling Gladwish Land Sales comes up with almost nothing of note, but surely if you bought the land from them, YOU own the land and they have no further part to play in the matter - unless it is one of these 'buy greenbelt land as an investment' companies and you have been stung over the last 12 years.

 

Is this the right company http://gladwishlandsales.com/

 

How big is the bit of land in question?

 

Yes that is the company from which I bought the land.

My plot is 0.46 Acre.

Gladwish said that they would pay a contractor to completely de-weed the whole of the 28 Acre site and then charge each plot owner a fee to cover the cost. I agree that it seems strange that Gladwish are involved despite all the plots being sold to private owners.

Looking at the paperwork I received from Gladwish, the original complaint regarding the Weeds Act was sent to them from Natural England in Reading, Berks. Strange how they didn't write to each individual plot owner as each plot owners details are held at the Land Registry and easily available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you just have to tell them that you are unable to clear the weeds; but you are happy to allow them to do it (although cannot afford to reimburse the cost).

 

 

Or better yet, sell the land.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that is the company from which I bought the land.

My plot is 0.46 Acre.

Gladwish said that they would pay a contractor to completely de-weed the whole of the 28 Acre site and then charge each plot owner a fee to cover the cost. I agree that it seems strange that Gladwish are involved despite all the plots being sold to private owners.

Looking at the paperwork I received from Gladwish, the original complaint regarding the Weeds Act was sent to them from Natural England in Reading, Berks. Strange how they didn't write to each individual plot owner as each plot owners details are held at the Land Registry and easily available.

 

 

from there :

2 Penalty for failure to comply with requirement.

 

(1) Where a notice has been served under section one of this Act on the occupier of any land and that person unreasonably fails to comply with the requirements of the notice, he shall be guilty of an offence and shall, on summary conviction be liable to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale or, in the case of a second or subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding [level 3 on the standard scale.]

 

(2) If a failure in respect of which a person is convicted under the preceding subsection is not remedied within fourteen days after the conviction he shall be guilty of a further offence under that subsection and may be punished accordingly.

 

(3) Proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) of this section shall not be instituted except by the Minister.

So, no mention of prison!

 

 

I have renently been informed by Gladwish Land Sales that I must clear my land of weeds otherwise I will go to prison.

 

Your options include selling the land, or asking Gladwish under what legislation you could be sent to prison, and asking Natural England if they (or other government agency acting on behalf of the Minister) have served any notice regarding dangerous weeds on that land.

Link to post
Share on other sites

from there :

So, no mention of prison!

 

 

 

Your options include selling the land, or asking Gladwish under what legislation you could be sent to prison, and asking Natural England if they (or other government agency acting on behalf of the Minister) have served any notice regarding dangerous weeds on that land.

 

Yes it does all seem a little strange. Gladwish called me last week saying that they recently sent me a letter regarding this issue. I haven't recently received any such letter.

Gladwish then asked me to pay them using my debit card to clear the weeds from my plot. I still hadn't received a letter so I became suspicious. When I told Gladwish that I hadn't received any letter from them and refused to give them my debit card details, that's when they said I would go to prison. I will take your advice and contact Natural England next week to check what is happening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

from there :

So, no mention of prison!

 

 

 

Your options include selling the land, or asking Gladwish under what legislation you could be sent to prison, and asking Natural England if they (or other government agency acting on behalf of the Minister) have served any notice regarding dangerous weeds on that land.

 

prison - countryside and wildlife act (link above)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is strange - Ragwort is illegal to uproot unless you are the owner / occupier of the land, or you have authorisation.

 

Further reading here: http://www.plantlife.org.uk/uploads/documents/Ragwort_Position_statement_FINAL_PUBLIC_July07.pdf

 

In that article, it says ragwort is dangerous to horses etc, as they eat it. My own knowledge of this plant is that it can also be dangerous to humans if it comes into contact with the skin. (liver damage) - although there is little scientific evidence of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

prison - countryside and wildlife act (link above)

 

Which section? Have you checked what the Act actually says?

 

Your "link above" is to:

http://www.japaneseknotweedremoval.co.uk/japanese-knotweed-legislation-uk.html Who cite

 

“If any person plants or other wise causes to grow in the wild any plant which is included in part 2 of schedule 9, they shall be found guilty of offence. Japanese Knotweed is included in the schedule of plants. Any person convicted under this act could be liable to a fine of £5,000 and / or 6 months in prison or 2 years in prison and unlimited fines on indictment."

 

The relevant section being cited is S.14(2)

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/69/section/14

 

Note that "plants or other wise causes to grow in the wild" is a 'sin of commission', and this is NOT the same as the 'sin of omission' of "failed to stop the relevant weed growing" ; are you suggesting the OP deliberately caused this weed to grow? If not, under what statute (so, Act & section) do you still claim the OP can be sent to prison?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defra issued this warning to Gladwish Land Sales who passed it onto me.

 

Formal enforcement under the weeds act will follow if I fail to kill the weeds.

 

Recently Gladwish told me that I will go to prison if I fail to comply.

 

 

OK I think I can help. First of all I have Googled and what I have found about Gladwish does not seem particularly endearing,

 

I would consider it extremely unlikely that anyone would go to prison over this. There is no legal requirement on anyone to clear the weeds listed under the Weeds Act unless they are ordered to do so. The only crime is failing to comply with an order which carries a fine.

 

You can find a copy of the law here with an explanation.

http://www.ragwortfacts.com/ragwort-law.html

 

The Weeds Act was never , or hardly ever, enforced until some people started making things up about ragwort to scare people.

I am not aware of any cases where control of other weeds is being enforced.

 

The guidelines issued by DEFRA are based on an absolutely atrocious and unscientific misuse of statistics. The numbers they use to estimate risk are statistically invalid and actually show a lack of basic numeracy in statistics. See this for the essentials.

http://ragwort-hysteria.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/defra-ragwort-code-of-practice-nonsense.html

 

Also be very very sceptical of what any weed control firm tells you.

See this for where the Advertising Standards people have been taking action.

 

http://wildlifenews.co.uk/2011/07/ragwort-alarmists-rapped-by-advertising-standards-authority/

 

And finally for an example of things being made up. This is a recent one where the Press Complaints Commission became involved.

 

http://www.swanseafoe.org.uk/ragwort-horse-and-hound-press-complaints-commission.html

 

If you can send me a personal message I may be able to offer some useful advice. I do wonder if Gladwish want you to pay them to do the clearance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note that "plants or other wise causes to grow in the wild" is a 'sin of commission', and this is NOT the same as the 'sin of omission' of "failed to stop the relevant weed growing" ; are you suggesting the OP deliberately caused this weed to grow? If not, under what statute (so, Act & section) do you still claim the OP can be sent to prison?

 

Of course I am not suggesting that the OP deliberately caused this weed to grow.

 

Any person convicted under this act could be liable to a fine of £5,000 and / or 6 months in prison or 2 years in prison and unlimited fines on indictment.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course I am not suggesting that the OP deliberately caused this weed to grow.

 

So, you accept the threats of prison are unwarranted?

 

It is just that (for some reason) you have requoted the "can go to prison" section that ISN'T applicable unless it was a deliberate act ........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does all seem a little strange. Gladwish called me last week saying that they recently sent me a letter regarding this issue. I haven't recently received any such letter.

Gladwish then asked me to pay them using my debit card to clear the weeds from my plot. I still hadn't received a letter so I became suspicious. When I told Gladwish that I hadn't received any letter from them and refused to give them my debit card details, that's when they said I would go to prison. I will take your advice and contact Natural England next week to check what is happening.

 

Personally I wouldn't attract attention to yourself. DEFRA will only take action if they have had a complaint and there is ragwort there and the land is close to grazing land. It is interesting that Gladwish are talking about "weeds" when in reality only Ragwort is ever a problem.

It sounds a bit odd to me. If I lived close to the site I would go and look at it for you. Perhaps someone can find a botanist to check it for you and perhaps tell you what else grows there. The plant community might tell a knowledgeable person quite a lot about the chances of you ever having those weeds. I would tell them you authorise nothing at all unless they provide you with documentary evidence. In fact I would refuse to deal with them on the phone and tell them to put everything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, you accept the threats of prison are unwarranted?

 

It is just that (for some reason) you have requoted the "can go to prison" section that ISN'T applicable unless it was a deliberate act ........

 

IMO, many threats of prison are unwarranted. It was requoted for your benefit since you asked. The operative word being "can"

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend who ownes land in Portugal has offered to visit my plot and spray it

with weed killer that he bought for de-weeding his land.

He is willing to do this for me and only charge me for his petrol.

Maybe by doing this I can get Gladwish off my back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just discovered that several plot owners who own plots on the edge of the

site have been granted full planning permission to build a nursing home.

Being of suspicious mind, I wonder if this weeds caper is some kind of

fiddle to compulsory purchase other adjacent plots. I know that with planning

permission, my plot would be worth over £400.000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...