Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PIP claim /DLA renewal


fletch70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

A bit odd, I had a phone call today and they went through my application to 'save time' on my visit next week. I smell a rat but wondering if this has happened to anyone else. My M.P is involved since the fiasco a couple of weeks ago .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

She didn't say and I was not on the ball enough to check. She obviously had some health training and oddly referred to some of my drugs by the brand name and not the generic name that I had put down.

She had all my notes and went through all my pills, in fact she even mentioned one that I didn't list. All very odd

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

not on the ball enough to check

 

Highlights why I never give any of 'them' my phone number - I like to have plenty of time to think about what I tell them.

 

It does sound as if it might have been the actual HCP who spoke to you - perhaps they're trying to avoid having to see you at all, though that's probably a bit optimistic!

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Was that with an actual assessment or just based on the forms and phone call?

 

I can't be certain about PIP, but for ESA they can't normally deny benefit without a face to face.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a home assessment, there are so many things that she really has not mentioned. I have no idea what she wrote as she wouldn't read it back ans he also refused to take a copy of some notes I had made/

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I have received a copy of the report and also phoned the DWP to be told that they have reduced my total point score!

 

In the assessment on almost every page she says there are inconsistencies between medical report and observation/form filled. She claimed that I can manage my finances, that I do not have a problem remembering to take my pills , that I heat up food in the microwave out of choice.

 

I believe that the DWP have deliberately misinterpreted the guidelines on how to score so I shall be taking it to appeal but of course that could take a long time.

 

Any recommendations on how to fill out the appeal form?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear that, Fletch.

 

Have you read the forum stikky on ESA appeals? I would hope it's pretty much the same as a PIP appeal in terms of picking holes in the assessment. Hopefully someone will confirm that.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I may have posted on this before but wonder if anyone has had similar experiences with Capita

 

Was on DLA, applied for PIP. Turned down, MR and Tribunal still only got 5 points. In the process of applying to upper tier , just asked for a Sine die extension due to below

 

Reapplied 19th August with a change of circumstances

Offered me assessment in Brum, I asked for taxi from station c. £5 they refused but offered me home visit

 

Home visit early Oct , same HCP as previous claim . Told report would be written up within 24 hours

 

Two weeks later get phone call, need more details, second home visit arranged , their appointment was bad for me so rarranged by 2 days, was going to be same HCP

 

20 hrs before appointment phone call to cancel , rearranged for another 2 weeks , this time a different HCP, is still a bad day for me but I really do not want to rearrange again

 

The whole uncertainty thing is really getting to me, affecting my studies and my life in general

 

I have written to Capita to complain, copied in the PIP people and my M.P. as well as Justin whathisface at the DWP.

Any general thoughts please

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a specific point of law in which you are disputing that the court got wrong? You can't just apply to upper tribunal because you don't agree with the first tribunal. And you need permission.

 

I doubt complaining to Capita will do anything, They don't make the decision or allocate points to any of the descriptors, It DWP that do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I didn't make it clear

There is Claim #1 Started Nov 14 and now hopefully going to Upper tier. My request is based on the grounds that the first tier Tribunal did not apply the law correctly i.e Did not apply the DWP rules on cooking a simple meal, did not use the definition of reliably as defined by S.I.455

In addition it did not appear to take any notice of certain medical evidence and although they gave a detailed explanation of the decision , no mention at all was made of certain evidence such my Irlens syndrome and the adaptive technology I use to write and understand complex information. I have applied for an extension for getting my appeal in because the results of claim 2 may be crucial

 

Now there is claim #2

Made Aug 2015 under new circumstances

Had a home assessment early Oct, 2 weeks later had a call saying more info needed. This assessment was done by the same HCP as for claim#1

An appointment was made for the 2nd home visit 5th Nov. At the last minute this was cancelled and a new appointment made for 17th . This is the complaint to Capita etc

 

Having seen the HCP report from the first appointment I must disagree with your comment that they do not allocate points. On the first visit they did allocate points which were used by the DWP

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my PIP was carried out by ATOS, And I can assure you that it is DWP who allocate what points you get, I even spoke to the decision maker. I doubt you will be successful in your first claim as no error in law exists, Just because you feel you should be awarded points for a descriptor, If this was the case upper tribunal would be extremely busy as everyone would be pointing out what they don't agree with, Which is what you do in the lower tribunal.

 

The maximum points for preparing food is 8, So say you did get there, They could still only award you 2 points which is still not enough for PIP standard rate. As you need a minimum of 8.

 

Also you can't have two claims for PIP. What circumstances changed from the first claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will have to agree to differ.Of course officially the dwp allocate points however I can assure you that the Hcp from capita gave points which were identicle to those given by the dwp. There are many reported cases apparently where this happens. I gave you two examples of where the first tier erred which according to the upper tier are both grounds for appeal.

 

Again you are mistaken about putting in a new claim. I took professional advice on this. I am not going to put the details on a public forum just to say at least one condition has worsened with different and extra medication and another condition has developed Remember there was a 10 month gap between claims

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

What is the legality of covert recording of home assessment visits as a memory aid. i.e Not to be published but listened to by myself .

 

I covertly recorded both my Capita home visits and in my decision things were stated that were not true . I was wondering if it will do me harm to say in my letter for a MR

 

I recorded both Capita visits for my own benefit and upon listening to them it would seem that the following statements made in your decision are in error......

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are perfectly entitled to record anything for your own purposes despite all the DWPs and ATOS' (don't know about Capita) huffing and puffing.

A tribunal may or may not be willing to consider a recording or a transcript but I don't see what harm it could do to let DWP know you have it.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you RMW

 

I have been having trouble with capita,

 

Visit 3rd Oct

17th Oct phone call to say more info needed, booked for 5th Nov

4th Nov telephone call cancelling visit and remaking for 17th Nov

16th Nov , cancelling visit at which point I lost the plot and they did have someone available on 17th

 

Decision is comprehensive but inaccurate

Still waiting for assessment form

 

have also SAR'd capita

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like there's not much difference between them and ATOS then.

 

I'm going to guess that DWP will refuse to listen to your recording as you won't be able to prove it hasn't been tampered with, but they might allow your mandatory reconsideration anyway. If they don't then I'm going to guess that the tribunal will consider either a transcript or the original recording in combination with other evidence and decide that on balance of probability your version is correct.

 

There wouldn't be any harm at all in not only mentioning that you have the recording but also referring to the attached transcript of the relevant section and mentioning how it's supported by other evidence and/or it's consistent with what you put in your claim form.

  • Haha 1

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been listening to the recording and there are some shocking assumptions made by the assessor . According to him, the question about preparing a meal, which the law states is a 'simple one course meal made from fresh ingredients ' is related to your ability to make a sandwich or make beans on toast . When talking about mobility the questions were incredibly general and leading such as 'so you can walk around college and get to classes' and then talking over me when I tried to explain it was 1 class , a small college and that i had a lift pass (only students with a need can have a pass for the lift although most of them it's because they are carrying their makeup trolley)

 

Once my PA4V has arrived I will be going through the report and listening to the recording

 

I am sure it will not be included that there were two visits 6 weeks apart .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

In November I sent a SAR to Capita PIP

 

Today while chasing a response to a complaint I asked about the SAR request and was told that would have been sent to the DWP to fulfil

 

I can not believe that this is correct especially as the DWP have no record of a visit that capita made to my home on 7th OCT

 

Does anyone know the actual situation

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, DWP are the data controllers. At least you know it's been received and sent to the right dept. now. Although they still have 40 calender days in which to supply the docs, so don't let them fob you off.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...