Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics


joeski
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1962 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes - if you're "matched" to a job by a JSA adviser then you can be sanctioned if you don't apply. You could also be sanctioned if you don't attend training courses you're referred to by the Jobcentre. If you're on the Work Programme, the Jobcentre won't refer you for courses but your WP provider might.

 

well i was not matched to a job by a jsa adviser it was 2 weeks a go i got ask to attend a job information session at ingeus and after it u had the chance to go ahead and get put forward for interviews or if it did not suit u then to let the my ingeus adivser know that it was not for me and i sayed it was not for me and she sayed thats fine and asked her if i would be sanctioned and she replied saying we are not the job centre so we wont be sanction u u will just have to keep working harder for jobs as i all ready do and i always attend my work programme that been asked to go to and always go to my appointments if am not well al call in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Then you are probably fine. I do suspect that our WP watchers on the forum would suggest that you treat anything you're told by an Ingeus adviser with a pinch of salt. Still, it doesn't, on the face of it, sound like they're intending to raise any sanction doubt in this case.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my friend got his ATOS questionnaire through the post today, does this mean his ESA claim has been processed or he has to complete the questionnaire before it can be processed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

my friend got his ATOS questionnaire through the post today, does this mean his ESA claim has been processed or he has to complete the questionnaire before it can be processed?

 

You mean the ESA50 form? The claim should still be processed, but he must take care to return it by the deadline date or he could have problems later.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean the ESA50 form? The claim should still be processed, but he must take care to return it by the deadline date or he could have problems later.

 

yes thats right, i think it said it has to be returned by the 10th april. does the fact that he has received an ESA50 mean the claim has been processed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes thats right, i think it said it has to be returned by the 10th april. does the fact that he has received an ESA50 mean the claim has been processed?

 

Yes.

 

And send esa 50 back with proof of posting ie Recovered delivery or Data post ...

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats good and how long will he have to wait for an assessment?

 

How long is a piece of string? Anything from a few weeks to a few months, according to what folks on this forum have reported. The assessment doesn't need to happen before he'll get payments, though.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long is a piece of string? Anything from a few weeks to a few months, according to what folks on this forum have reported. The assessment doesn't need to happen before he'll get payments, though.

 

thats good to know but does it mean the claim has been processed if he got and ESA50 through?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats good to know but does it mean the claim has been processed if he got and ESA50 through?

 

Yes, probably - the procedure for an Atos referral doesn't start until the claim is established on the computer. He can call the Benefits Centre that pays his claim (not the local Jobcentre) to ask for clarity on this and when he can expect payment. His payment day may not be the same as it was when he claimed JSA.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, probably - the procedure for an Atos referral doesn't start until the claim is established on the computer. He can call the Benefits Centre that pays his claim (not the local Jobcentre) to ask for clarity on this and when he can expect payment. His payment day may not be the same as it was when he claimed JSA.

 

i will inform him but the chances of him actually ringing up are small as he doesn't feel comfortable on the phone, hence why he made the ESA claim via an ESA1 instead of phoning them. he'll probably check his bank everyday until his payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will inform him but the chances of him actually ringing up are small as he doesn't feel comfortable on the phone, hence why he made the ESA claim via an ESA1 instead of phoning them. he'll probably check his bank everyday until his payment.

 

If he is able to speak on the phone long enough to clear basic security then you, or anyone else he trusts, could speak for him.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he is able to speak on the phone long enough to clear basic security then you, or anyone else he trusts, could speak for him.

 

 

thats a good idea, ive told him to check tomorrow to see if anything has gone into his bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

my friend is on ESA for anxiety and depression issues, he received a letter through the post from his WP provider about an advisor appointment but the wording is for a JSA claim. i haven't been on here in a while and ive checked the WP guidance which clearly states the working has to be different for the 2 benefits so does my friend have to attend the appointment even though he is on ESA and the letter says if he does not attend his JSA claim might be affected?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would most def attempt to find out what exactly it is they are saying , if you further do not attend they will accuse your friend of not trying all avenues to discover what they require of him. They tend to be a law unto themselves use the telephone number on the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would most def attempt to find out what exactly it is they are saying , if you further do not attend they will accuse your friend of not trying all avenues to discover what they require of him. They tend to be a law unto themselves use the telephone number on the letter.

 

ok thanks i will tell him to call them tomorrow, also he is still on assessment rate ESA and do WP advisors have the power to call a claimants doctor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will not call them if they need information they normally write to Doctors

 

 

personally id put nothing past WP providers, how often do ESA claimants on assessment rate have to attend the WP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally id put nothing past WP providers, how often do ESA claimants on assessment rate have to attend the WP?

 

Claimants on the Assessment Rate do not have to attend the WP. It gets a bit complicated for those who were previously on JSA, as the Provider often doesn't understand the rules and continues to send appointments and generally harass the claimant. However, only claimants on the WRAG can be mandatory WP participants. Assessment Rate claimants may be required to attend interviews at the Jobcentre on occasion, however.

 

WP Providers should not be contacting doctors, whether by letter or phone.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimants on the Assessment Rate do not have to attend the WP. It gets a bit complicated for those who were previously on JSA, as the Provider often doesn't understand the rules and continues to send appointments and generally harass the claimant. However, only claimants on the WRAG can be mandatory WP participants. Assessment Rate claimants may be required to attend interviews at the Jobcentre on occasion, however.

 

WP Providers should not be contacting doctors, whether by letter or phone.

 

thanks for the information, what will happen if my friend decides not to attend?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the information, what will happen if my friend decides not to attend?

 

Probably nothing, but he should be prepared for the possibility that the WP provider will send a WP8 (sanction referral) to the Jobcentre. In theory, they should send it straight back to the WPP and tell them to learn the damn rules, but if they don't, they should certainly ask him to comment before applying any sanction. His comment should be that:

 

a) WP participation is not mandatory for ESA Assessment Phase claimants; and

b) The wording on his MAN was in any case incorrect for an ESA claimant. The MAN was therefore invalid, and no activity is mandatory without a valid MAN.

 

It may not come to that. Best be prepared is all.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably nothing, but he should be prepared for the possibility that the WP provider will send a WP8 (sanction referral) to the Jobcentre. In theory, they should send it straight back to the WPP and tell them to learn the damn rules, but if they don't, they should certainly ask him to comment before applying any sanction. His comment should be that:

 

a) WP participation is not mandatory for ESA Assessment Phase claimants; and

b) The wording on his MAN was in any case incorrect for an ESA claimant. The MAN was therefore invalid, and no activity is mandatory without a valid MAN.

 

It may not come to that. Best be prepared is all.

 

thanks i will tell him and hopefully he'll stop worrying so much about it, ive told him to email to advisor the day before saying he will not be attending as he is currently in the process of getting help for anxiety and depression.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful when dealing with parasites such as the Work Programme. They probably sent your friend the letter worded as it was for a JSA claimant. But they probably already know he is suffering from Mental Health issues and he is on ESA. In their eyes he will be an easy target for them, easy to manipulate. They did the same with me and at the same time they make money from it. They are a law unto themselves and they need getting rid of.

 

Once he get's into the office they will having signing all sorts and threatening him with a sanction to receive the best results.

 

He would be better off calling them rather than emailing, they tend to ignore emails.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful when dealing with parasites such as the Work Programme. They probably sent your friend the letter worded as it was for a JSA claimant. But they probably already know he is suffering from Mental Health issues and he is on ESA. In their eyes he will be an easy target for them, easy to manipulate. They did the same with me and at the same time they make money from it. They are a law unto themselves and they need getting rid of.

 

Once he get's into the office they will having signing all sorts and threatening him with a sanction to receive the best results.

 

He would be better off calling them rather than emailing, they tend to ignore emails.

 

As an ESA claimant in the Assessment Phase, joeski's friend has no need to engage with the WPP at all. Oh sure, they will probably attempt to fool him into thinking otherwise, but any decision to sanction must be made by the DWP, not the WPP.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...