Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Orange Trying their luck


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased an Orange 1 month rolling contract chip which was £25 per month and included unlimited calls, texts and internet which I thought was ideal as my son likes talking too much. Anyway he decides to call a premium rate number to some chat line thinking it is free and guess what the bill was raised to £100 in call charges without me being informed or a call to say the account has been suspended because of this, I could not even talk to anyone as there was only a mobile customer services which I refused to use. Eventually I contacted them and told them to cancel the contract gave one months notice and did not use the phone until it was suspended. I then get a £200 bill not stating any breakdown of how this has occurred and saying your account has now been suspended.

 

I was shocked obviously I would have to pay for what has been used but not 200 any advice on this would be very much appreciated.

 

Mashmallow:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest a premium number can be anything up to £9 a minuete (From what I have seen,) and due to it not being "capped," he can freely spend what he likes and it is yours/ his responsibility to make sure you don't call numbers that may cost this much. It would be in all the Ts and Cs unfortunately.

 

If you want a breakdown you may have to request it as on mine I only get "inclusive," "Premium," and "other" costs, but not an actual list underneath of what was called.

 

So I reckon with this you may be liable for the costs of the contact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I do agree but what I cannot accept is they suspended all calls when it reached the £100 mark so worst ways I would have been liable for £100 and only that amount and possibly the £25 for the contract so where or how can they charge for £200.

 

I just need some idea of what to write to Justify their charges.

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted orange to question the 200 debt and was told even through the line had been suspended mx telecom still pursued their calls after 5 stops were placed, therefore although the line was suspended and I was assured no calls would be connected this occurred after. Am I stupid or is this not daylight robbery.

 

Please help

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be for premium texts that they send & then bill you for until you text "STOP" to them!

 

Google mx telecom, have a read, then complain to the telecomms watchdog

 

I don't see why you can't complain to Orange too, if it's for receiving premium rate texts then presumably these weren't received & should have been bounced by Orange if the account was suspended. Surely suspended means suspended, as in can't run up further costs. If Orange have accepted some, they should pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for replying this is what I was getting at I cannot believe they have done this they lied, suspended means suspended no calls made or received whatever the kind, but they said this could still happen and it did to the sum of a further £80 I am it paying one penny to them and I have sent a letter to them stating this this is totally outrageous. I will also complain to the telecom company that did this I did text stop and so did my son I also called the office number and spoke to a person who took the details but hence nothing was done.

 

I just needed to clarify my argument first and I thank you for you prompt reply.

 

Many thanks

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that information Orange have not given me any bill so I have no idea what is on the bill. I have written to them asking for that information so if they don't reply they will not be getting 1p out of me.

 

Thanks once again

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that information Orange have not given me any bill so I have no idea what is on the bill. I have written to them asking for that information so if they don't reply they will not be getting 1p out of me.

 

Thanks once again

 

Mashmallow

 

but you would end up getting a default on your credit file

Write to their head office, get itemised bills, raise a complaint, tell them how you want them to resolve it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

About a year ago I engaged in a rolling contract with Orange/EE for £25 per month which included unlimited calls, texts, and data,

I could cancel after 1 month.

 

I let my son use the chip because he has no money to get his own contract.

 

my son decided to call a mobile chat line which he thought was free

turned out to be premium rate calls to two different companies,

 

At the time both were none the wiser until Orange suspended the account

and then I found out eventually after a few occasions that the bill had now reached £100.

 

I told them to suspend and cancel the account

I also called the two numbers t stop sending these texes

and I was assured by Orange no more calls could be received from these companies.

 

I wrote to Orange and said I was holding them responsible for allowing this to reach £100 and I wanted a refund for this,

 

another letter came stating the bill was for £200, no reply whatsoever.

 

I did not pay anything worse ways all I would have owed them is £25 rental and maybe £50 for the calls as my son was part blame for this.

 

Lowells has now taken the debt over and want £427 or else court action.

 

What should I do Bryan Carter is on a mission now

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell the horrible little man that you owe nothing, and that you have begun a formal complaint with EE, and until it is resolved, no further correspondence will be entered into, if he feels lucky and wants to attempt to take legal action against you regarding this, then you will defend it robustly and counter claim against him and EE.

 

Start their complaints procedure and exhaust it, tell them that simply passing this onto a tame solicitor to threaten and intimidate you, now means that the complaint will be exhausted and you fully intend to escalate this beyond their control and have them investigated by CISAS.

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/action/how-to-complain-to-the-ombudsman-about-a-mobile-phone-provider

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SO this has now got as far a BC? ... Should have come here earlier... Complain to Lowell and EE.... Lowell will put the account on hold and advise them you are in dispute with EE.

Complain complain complain.... The fruits of your labour so come to fruition

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will be liable for the call charges

If you do not have all the bills/ statements I would send EE a SAR to get all the info on you

 

Your credit file will prob be trashed with this

Noodle is free check it there

  • Confused 1

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just my noodle account and I got tis wrong the debt I thought it was is not, the debt the are chasing was years ago and not even on my credit file??

Have not got a clue where the dug this from???

Any idea when you last made a payment?

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This illustrates the problem with the debt purchasing industry

 

People think that they the debt that they are claiming is something different because there is insufficient detail.

 

Does any of the correspondence from Lowell / BC mention Orange / EE?

 

What previous correspondence have you received about any of this?

 

Have you received any letters of assignment?

 

I think that your first move should be to write & email Lowell & BC saying that you have no idea what this alleged debt is and for them to provide proof that you owe this amount and that they are entitled to receive it. Put a sentence denying any liability to them or their clients at the top of the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...