Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry but that letter needs to be much much better. you need to express that it was a stilly youthful mistake trying to be the big man and jumping the turnstile to look big infront of your peers. TfL prosecutors are on the email address on their first letter. get the court form sent back to the court , (but copy it first) stating you plead guilty and wish to attend to address the judge in person face to face to show your genuine remorse for your stupid youthful exuberance.      
    • I thought I should send the begging letter to the prosecutor. Does the hearing means the time I need to send back by? If so, it’s June 5  I plan to send the new begging letter as following, can I ask for some suggestions? Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,  Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.  I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.  I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.  Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.  I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.  I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.   Yours sincerely,
    • LoL Dx you crack me up. Thanks for the advice. I'll stay positive.
    • Utter Rubbish!! lowell dont write and beg for deals once they start court. as for your attitude, we'll thats nothing new for you.😎 you wont be quizzed, it's not like TV, simply refer to your defence/WS when answering anything the judge may ever ask. well it involves chickens. dx  
    • Thanks fk, I hope I don't have to face the court. Bless you for the reassurance. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell BT Telecom account in default reported on credit report


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am new to this site but it is exactly what the Dr. ordered. Brilliant self help. 

 

Lowell is reporting a default in the amount of £674.00 for a Telecoms supplier.

It gives an address that I lived at until

  • Moved in June 2014  out Dec 2014.
  • Account start date was 15/07/2013
  • Default 10/12/2015
  • This date not possible because I did not live at or have a land line in December of 2015.
  •  

Lowell is reporting account as of April 2016.

nothing from the telecoms supplier on the report.

 

I do not have any documents cornering this account.

I need to get docs to challenge the credit report.

 

what are the steps I should take?  

have read other posts about SAR.

should I ask  BT to provide me with a SAR first.

 

Also interesting twist to credit reporting, I have been reading GDPR on credit collectors.

I have not seen any comments on using this as a tool/argument to dispute credit reporting.

This would be correct since the originator of the data is NOT Lowell. 

 

Any one tried this angle?

any advice is appreciated.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome to CAG

 

I have moved your thread to the correct forum ...please continue to post here.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

a debt buyer cant register nor change the default date issued by the original creditor when or before they sold the debt.

 

so your target would be BT.

 

but its weird they've done so some 12mts after you left the property though.

unless Lowell have fudged it which not unheard of

eitherway

you dont owe the money. [till end of contract monthly sums] Ofcom are clear on this .

 

yep sar BT 1st lets see what gives

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 months later...

Lowell has written to me concerning this debt on the 23rd of Jan 2020.

letter states:

 

We have noted the contents of your letter and we understand that you have no knowledge of this account. We are able to offer the following information regarding the account.

 

• Agreement start date: 19/06/2014

• Application address: Flat 4, 3 Kempsford Gardens

• Tariff Description: Phone BB Hardware

• Disconnect Reason: Cessation by BT

• Original Creditor: BT Retail Consumer

• Mobile Number:02078351401 ( this is a landline )

• Client last payment date: 16/12/2014

• Client last payment value: 86.16 this is not £499.00

• Default date: 27/08/2015, this doesn't square with last pay date.

• Airtime Debt Value:257.94

• Early Terminate Fee:241.99, can they charge this?

• Billing Date:27/03/15

LOW105_230120 497503_MACHINE\ 116\247 \ lof2 \

 

Airtime Debt is for the services used and the Early Termination Fee is calculated to reflect the remaining months of your contract which remain unpaid from the date of your account closure.

 

We have requested from BT PLC a copy of the statements for the account to help clarify this matter for you. We will write to you further once we have received this documentation and in the meantime your account is on hold.

 

I obtain the SAR. it is attached: this is all they hold.

 

1. Can you explain the implications of the response and the SAR as far as Lowell being able to collect the debt?

2. I responded to Lowell with this letter:

Lowell Financial Ltd. 4875

 

Dear Sir:

I write to you in response to your letter of 23 January 2020. Insofar that a relationship may have existed between myself and BT I cannot recall this account (Agreement) and request that you supply me with a copy of the Account/Agreement and other documents listed in the bullet points of your response.

 

I deny any breach  of the purported agreement. You have failed to supply me with a copy of the agreement requested . I have never received any evidence that you are the legal owner of the debt, by assignment, sale and purchase agreement or otherwise. I have never received and am unaware of any legal notice of assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to Law and property Act 1925 Section 136(1). This document is not referenced in your response.

 

I deny that I have failed  to maintain the required payments to BT. It is denied that I have failed to respond to demands for payment sent by you and/or its agents. Lowell is put to strict proof that any such demands have been sent to me by you.

 

a). Lowell appears to  admit it is the assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Lowell has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925. 

 

b). It is further denied any funds are due Lowell  because the Lowell appears to have sold this debt to another firm in 2019.  Lowell must therefore show how it has legal right, either under statue or equity to collect this sum from me.

 

I  deny owing any money to Lowell  and you are required to produce evidence to support your claims that this sum is in default, due and owning this includes:

a. Show how the I  entered into an Agreement.

b. Show how I  have reached the amount claimed for.

c. Show that I  failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated as claimed.

d. Show that the statute of limitations on this alleged debt has not passed.

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) it is expected that Lowell must  prove the allegations that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed in its response letter. 

 

8. Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract. OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to consider the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service. 

 

You state that the balance due includes £241.99. You must remove this from any collection efforts, and I dispute that this and all other balances are owed by me.

 

9. Show that I was residing at Flat 4 3 Kempsford Gardens on the alleged defaulted date of 27/08/2015 or any other date after 16/12/2014.  Alternatively remove any debt you allege is owed  because back billing and billing for unused services is not allowed.

 

10. Please explain Lowell reporting to the credit bureaus that the debt outstanding to BT is £674. The account number concerning 3 Kempsford Gardens Flat 4 which I hold is another account number which is BT xx7 start date is 15/07.2013.

 

11. The account number you claim is owed to you is an original account number BT xxx 07. You claim the start date on this account is 19/06/2014. Please explain the discrepancy between these two accounts including ownership of both accounts, and why there are two accounts you allege for the same address with different dates. Alternatively, if you have no explanation:

 

You must cease and desist from collection activity including reporting to the credit bureaus, pre claim letters and any other forms of collection activity with immediate effect. Please write to me confirming that you will take no further action. Failing this I will file a counterclaim and ask the court for costs.

Kind Regards

 

 I received the email below last night: "I can see that we also hold the following account details for you:

 

Account Number

Original Client

Original Client Reference

Current Balance

XXX192

Orange

xxx321

£285.91

XXX875

BT PLC

xxx207

£499.93

 

I can see that the above BT PLC account is currently on hold, as we are requesting information from BT PLC directly.

 

1. how long does BT have to respond? the date of Lowell letter was 23rd of Jan.

2. if BT doesn't respond within that time frame, what can I do to get the account removed from the Credit reports? .

3. how can I get Lowell to stop collection if BT doesn't respond?

 

what is also interesting is I have a letter from Lowell for the orange account and also a BT account, but the balance is £199.11 and the account number ends in 192. There are too many account numbers with different balances for the same address. any suggestions how I address this with Lowell?

 

Lowell writes:  

"The period for recovering your Orange account by court action has expired. We will not be issuing court proceedings to enforce payment. However, your debt still exists and legally we are within our rights to continue to ask you for repayment. With this being said, this account does not look to have a payment arrangement set up as of yet. How would you like to proceed with this account going forward? If you can let us know then we can look to assist you further".

 

If the time has expired to collect a debt from orange, how do they have a right to collect? seems the SOL runs for both. how should I respond?

 

In the meantime, I have placed your Vodafone and Orange accounts on hold for the next 30 days to give you time to get back to us.

 

Can you give me some suggestions on how I unravel this and respond?

Thank you. 

SAR_BT.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you enter into pointless letter tennis?

have you had a letter of claim or a court claimform?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the debt was already defaulted by BT when they sold it on

Lowell cant change that nor are they harming your rating any further by continually reporting to it.

 

its on your file till the defaults 6th birthday, then it will vanish paid or not.

doesn't mean the debt is not still owed mind.

but that's down to Lowell to chance issue a letter of claim and then p'haps a court claim.

until then - ignore them..though neither of the above should you ignore

 

until then

no good you firing all your bullets as you have, as they'll know what your defence is.

we've not lost a Lowell telecom claim for ages now and they normally discontinue when fronted out.

 

your pointless letter tennis simply makes them think one more letter will scare you into paying.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

the debt was already defaulted by BT when they sold it on

Lowell cant change that nor are they harming your rating any further by continually reporting to it.

Incorrect, its a defaulted acct effects credit score.  

 

I cannot ignore the credit reports.

 

please answer my question.

1. how long does BT have to respond? the date of Lowell letter was 23rd of Jan. 

 

2. if BT doesn't respond within that time frame, what can I do to get the account removed from the Credit reports? .

 

3. how can I get Lowell to stop collection if BT doesn't respond timely.

 

1. Can you explain the implications of the response and the SAR as far as Lowell being able to collect the debt?

thank you. 

 

Not going to pay, not scared either. If they canot prove debt the report comes off 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Escaped said:

Incorrect, its a defaulted acct effects credit score.  - correct by the OC upon sale, Lowell simply updating doesn't harm the score anymore

 

I cannot ignore the credit reports. - why not?

 

please answer my question.

1. how long does BT have to respond? the date of Lowell letter was 23rd of Jan. - respond to what? ..your SAR = 30days.

 

2. if BT doesn't respond within that time frame, what can I do to get the account removed from the Credit reports? .- you can't 

 

3. how can I get Lowell to stop collection if BT doesn't respond timely.- you don't have too

 

1. Can you explain the implications of the response and the  SAR as far as Lowell being able to collect the debt? - they can ask or issue PAPLOC/courtclaim.

 

thank you. 

 

Not going to pay, not scared either. If they canot prove debt the report comes off

 

not surewhat sites you are reading, but you debt theories are woefully incorrect.

 

being unable to prove a debt doesn't mean its removal, only the OC can do that, and as you owed money, they defaulted you and quite correctly so.

anything after that date on your file has no effect on it.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You misunderstood

how long does bt have to produce the requested d ocs here? 

 

Agreement start date: 19/06/2014

• Application address: Flat 4, 3 Kempsford Gardens

• Tariff Description: Phone BB Hardware

• Disconnect Reason: Cessation by BT

• Original Creditor: BT Retail Consumer

• Mobile Number:02078351401 ( this is a landline )

• Client last payment date: 16/12/2014

• Client last payment value: 86.16 this is not £499.00 

• Default date: 27/08/2015, this doesn't square with last pay date. 

• Airtime Debt Value:257.94

• Early Terminate Fee:241.99, can they charge this? 

• Billing Date:27/03/15

If no response within statutory time,  what can i do to get lowell remove credit report?

Can you explain the implications of the response and the  SAR as far as Lowell being able to collect the debt? - they can ask or issue PAPLOC/courtclaim. 

I attached the sar is this enuf info to prove lowell has any legal rights?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well what do you expect

they are a fleecing dca and should have been ignored from day 1

No-one said engage with them. 

 

Your target is/was bt.

They dont have to provide anything ...there must be some sort of debt to them. If that sum is incorrect so what?

 

Just because they cant provide paperwork doesnt mean the entry should be removed.

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

We have the right to contact you about the debt we hold which is as follows, however we can remove this email from our system again if you wish:

 

Account Number

Original Client

Original Client Reference

Current Balance

xxxxx1368

Vodafone

xxxxx4850

£674.76

 

The Limitation Act and your account

We’ve noted your comments, however, Vodafone account ...... is not statute barred under the Limitation Act 1980.

 

This is because the full balance became due after you defaulted on the original agreement.

According to Vodafone, the Default Date was 10/12/2015 and the debt remains enforceable for 6 years after this date.

 

This account had an agreement start date of 15/07/2013 and was disconnected on 06/09/15.

It relates to phone number xxxxx08279.

The last payment on this account was made for £108.85 on 13/04/2015 before a default was applied on 10/12/2015 for the balance of £674.76. 

 

this account and telephone number is not mine.

I provided Lowell with evidence that at the time of the default, i was living in another country. 

 

The debt is comprised of an Early Termination Fee of £206.96 and had an Airtime Debt Value of £467.80. how do i dispute this? 

 

Airtime debt is made up of any usage and your monthly payments until the account was disconnected.

Early Termination Fees are charged as your account was closed prior to your contract expiry date as specified in the Terms and Conditions of the contract, as such you become liable to pay the full cost of the remaining line rental.

Does this help you to recognise the account? NO

 

Please be advised that we are unable to supply you with a copy of the deed of assignment as this account was purchased as part of a bulk of accounts and therefore the assignment will hold personal data in relation to our other customers.

Lowell are not legally obliged to provide this information.

 

Ok if this is the case, then how can they collect the debt. what do i need to ask for to dispute? 

 

The deed of assignment is an agreement entered into between the original owners of the accounts and Lowell Portfolio I Ltd.

The deed of assignment does not contain any specific details relating to individual customers whose debts are being purchased.

This contract is therefore not part of the information which you are entitled to.

 

A copy of the notice of assignment is attached to this email. i have included this in my post. 

 

I have requested a copy of a statement from Vodafone which may come in the form of a final bill. The account is on hold until the document can be provided.

 

Lowell are not applying any charges or interest to the balance.

 

Lowell is not obliged to provide an agreement for this account as telecommunications contracts (landline, mobile and broadband) are a service agreement and not a credit agreement, as defined by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. As this is not a regulated agreement under the Consumer Credit Act, there is no obligation to provide a copy signed agreement.

 

For telecommunications contracts, usage of the equipment is taken as acceptance of the terms and conditions of the contract. Telecommunications accounts can be obtained by telephone, online and by mail order, this means that a signed agreement may never have existed, so we wouldn’t look to request one from the original creditor.

 

There’s no obligation for Lowell to issue a new default notice, default warning letter or provide copies of the original default notice, suspension or termination notices issued by any original companies. i was asking for the original default letter and other supporting documents from them. if they cannot provide, surely they will stop collecting, Right? 

 

For further information relating to charges and payments made to Vodafone, you would need to submit a Data Subject Access Request direct to Vodafone. so should i send a SAR to Vodafone? 

 

Data Subject Access Request

If there’s some particular information you need, or you have a specific question about your account, let us know – we’re here to help and will contact Vodafone on your behalf.

 

However, if you want a copy of all the information Vodafone hold for the account, you would need to submit a data subject access request to Vodafone, in accordance with data protection legislation.

 

We also have details of the following accounts:

notice of assignment.pdf

how do i respond to this please? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so this debt is now a vodafone one?

 

Lowell Telecom account in default reported on credit report - Telecoms - mobile or fixed - Consumer Action Group

 

you were told before to stop pointless letter tennis 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them until/unless you get a letter of claim.

so why did you tell us last time this was a BT debt ?

 

but the same advice applies as in that other thread..

a telecom provider can't issue a default notice so that date is pretty much immaterial.

its already defaulted so your file can't be harmed anymore.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they wrote to me last time and told me  I also had a BT debt. its now time barred. seems this is a new one. Its not my account. so i cannot ignore it. i need to ask them to prove its my account. in this case, since its not, i need your help yo ask for proof. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send an SAR now. There is nothing to lose

Link to post
Share on other sites

why is it the same £value as the old supposed BT one..exactly the same!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Escaped said:

The last payment on this account was made for £108.85 on 13/04/2015 before a default was applied on 10/12/2015 for the balance of £674.76. 

Lowell stated the above

thats exactly the same as the bt thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Show that I was residing at  Kempsford Gardens on the alleged defaulted date of 27/08/2015 or any other date after 16/12/2014.  

 

Alternatively remove any debt you allege is owed because back billing and billing for unused services is not allowed.

 

10. Please explain Lowell reporting to the credit bureaus that the debt outstanding to BT is £674.

The account number concerning 3 Kempsford Gardens Flat 4 which I hold is another account number which is BT xx7 start date is 15/07.2013.

 

11. The account number you claim is owed to you is an original account number BT xxx 07.

You claim the start date on this account is 19/06/2014.

Please explain the discrepancy between these two accounts including ownership of both accounts, and why there are two accounts you allege for the same address with different dates. 

 

i assume this is what you are referring to ?

this is posted under my BT query on CAG. 

if yes you are right.

they reported the BT debt as the same amount, Bait and switch.

 

what should i do about this?

i just sent a SAR request to Vodafone

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them until unless they send a letter of claim with a reply pack.

stop contacting powerless dca's inviting pointless letter tennis.

back billing does not apply to telecom debts

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...