Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Issue with lost Samsung refund **RESOLVED**

Refund issues

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I've had an ongoing dispute with Samsung since October 2023.

I bought a phone and it was defective as it didn't make calls or receive calls due to no signal and I sent it back for a refund.

Samsung received the phone and stated it will take 7-10 working days to issue a refund.

The deadline for the refund to be issued passed. I contacted my bank and commenced a chargeback.

Samsung contacted me the day after and stated they couldn't issue me a refund unless I cancelled the chargeback which I did (stupidly did on advice of the customer service agent.) I asked the customer service agent if I can reopen the chargeback if Samsung fails to provide me a refund and was told I could.

Samsung then allegedly paid the money back to the chargeback knowing I had cancelled the chargeback!

I made a complaint against my bank as the customer service advisor had given me the wrong information and it was upheld in my favour and the bank stated in the resolution letter that Samsung need to refund me as the dispute reversal advice was received by them on November 14th.

I've been chasing Samsung for months I've even written to their CEO office and they've ignored all my attempts to contact them, the last email I received from them was as far as they're concerned they've paid the refund and the matter is closed!

I've contacted CAB and they told me to write an official letter of complaint to Samsung and if I didn't hear from them then to send a letter stating that I will take court action against them if I don't hear from them. They've asked me to follow the process prior to taking Samsung to small claims court 

This seems to have worked and someone from the Escalation team has been in touch stating that they are adamant the refund has been made to me and supplied a ARN number and to supply the number to my bank.

This is where the issues begin,

my bank can't locate the refund that Samsung has allegedly paid and the ARN actually refers to the transaction that I made to pay for the phone!

Samsung now want a letter from my Bank to state they can't locate the funds but my bank doesn't want to help as they're giving me the run around

I'm at the end of my tether as this has been ongoing since October.

What are my options as I don't know what else to do.

It's causing me an untold amount of stress as the refund is a significant amount of money.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

on what date are Samsung saying the refund payment was made?

surely proof would simply be a couple of monthly statement printouts from your online banking portal?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Samsung are saying that the refund was made on the 13th November 2023 straight to the cancelled Chargeback. However it was sent back to them by the VISA online team on the 14th November.

It's not as simple as producing statements from my bank account, I've produced documents from my bank that I do not have the money but Samsung are adamant that they have paid the refund.

Their 14 day notice is up tomorrow then I can take them to small claims court

I'm worried that Samsung will say exactly the same thing and the Judge will throw the case out.

My bank is being unhelpful too, they indirectly put me in this position and I'm thinking of putting a new complaint in or going to the Financial Ombudsman with regards to their conduct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much are you talking about here?
Also, although it is probably not relevant now who was the dealer who supplied you the telephone? It is they who should have been responsible for a defective phone.

Which is your bank?

The problem here is that if Samsung really have made the refund and the error is the bank's, then you will lose your case and the money you spent on the claimant and you will then have to begin again against the bank.
It seems to me that the bank might be a clearer target for you because they have already admitted an error and so you could probably compel them to refund you and then to settle it between themselves and Samsung.

You say that you made a complaint which was upheld in your favour by the bank on the basis that the customer adviser gave you the wrong information about re-establishing a chargeback.
Please could you post up the letter that you received in PDF format.

One thing I should say is that you have sent a letter of claim to Samsung and yet clearly you weren't ready to proceed with the court action if you did not receive satisfaction from them.
One thing you must never – ever – do is to issue empty threats.
If you say that you're going to issue a legal action 14 days – then that's exactly what you do.

I don't think you are ready to issue legal action here. It's too complicated. The story is a bit of a mess – for us to understand – but anyway it's a mess anyway and we need to try and understand where you are.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your detailed reply, it's much appreciated.

The amount is £1050 and it was bought directly from Samsung UK it's Samsung's responsibility.

I bank with Barclays and their customer services do not have a clue as to what to do. I have basically been fobbed off and told to go back to Samsung.

The back and forth between Barclays and Samsung is getting tiresome.

I actually have the intentions of carrying out a claim via the small claims and it's not an idle / empty threat.

Apologies that it actually reads like a car crash, I will try to simplify it

1. Phone bought direct from Samsung. It was defective.

2. Returned to Samsung and promised a refund within 7-10 working days.

3. Deadline for refund passed and I initiated a Chargeback via my bank on the 8th November

4. Samsung contacted me on the 9th November and stated they cannot issue a refund when a Chargeback is place.

5. I called Barclays and discussed the chargeback and asked if Samsung fail to refund me could I restart the chargeback process again? I was told unequivocally yes.

6.Complaint made to Bank which was uphold in my favour. Person looking into the complaint stated that Samsung initiated the refund through the Chargeback process however as the Chargeback was cancelled the money was returned to them on the 14th November.

7. I have presented a letter to Samsung which reiterated the above they have stated that they have made a refund through the Chargeback process and as far as they're concerned the matter is closed.

8. Numerous attempts to contact Samsung have not led anywhere. Small claims court procedure initiated on advice of the CAB 

9. January 22nd contact from the Customer Escalations Team stating that a refund was issued through the chargeback process and given a ARN number and told to contact Barclays.

10. Barclays can't find the transaction and the ARN number actually refers to the transaction where I paid for the phone.

I want to take Samsung to Court but don't want to risk the Judge throwing the case out and siding with Samsung. 

I agree it is a bit of a mess and just wanted to sound out here what my options are.

I've uploaded the complaint letter from Barclays so people reading the post get a better picture.

Barclaysedited.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please check back for a reply later on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays are out of the question.

Go back to samsung and say the chargeback was closed and the funds were returned to samsung.

ask samsung for the right ARN given they gave the wrong one. hint if they can't provide it then you don't agree its issued.

If they won't budge then just sue them.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that you hang on a bit. I don't agree with the advice above and I would explain my reasons later.

I do agree that you should ask for the correct ARN but if it is not forthcoming then I think that your better option would be to go against the bank

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will contact them asking for a correct ARN number and not start the small claims court action against them.

I will await with interest your rationale as and when you're able to post it.

After spending over a hour on the phone to my bank they're refusing to help me any further with regards to initiating a trace of the funds and refusing to write a letter.

They have directed me to the Financial Ombudsman to make a complaint. I'm so incensed!!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did you contact your bank? I thought it was Samsung who would provide you with the ARN number

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted it in writing that the ARN was incorrect so I could supply it to Samsung.

Dotting the i's and crossing the T's so to speak 

Nevertheless the bank were less than helpful and stated that they do not write personalised letters and also they will be unable to trace the refund on the Chargeback as their systems do not allow it.

Was told to make an official complaint to the Financial Ombudsman and contact Samsung informing them they will need to conduct an investigation with their bank to ascertain where the money has gone!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a subject access request.

Do it today

In fact phone them up again and make the subject access request verbally on the phone.

They may refuse to accept the request but you are entitled to make a verbal request as long as you satisfy the identity requirements.

Once you have passed security questions then that is sufficient to make the subject Access request.

If they refuse then insist on speaking to a manager.

If they continue to refuse then tell them that you are making a complaint and then tell us about it here

Link to post
Share on other sites

from the bank 

We can't be sure what it will achieve although it will confirm your conversation about the ARN and also it will confirm their lack of cooperation.

It's completely free so there is no downside.

They have 30 days to comply so the longer you wait, the longer it will take.

If you are really lucky then they will refuse to provide you with the subject access request against your verbal demand.

This will give you an additional head of action to sue them for if it comes down to it

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a heads up, be careful.

If there is no proof that a refund was issued to bank by Samsung and you sue bank, you will likely get your account closed not to mention you will lose.

 

If samsung don't give proof, its samsung you need to go after, not the bank.

 

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard of something similar happening to another person.

I'm awaiting on Samsung's response and asking for proof. Will see what they come up with.

Thanks for the heads up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jk2054 said:

Yep, banks won't take lightly to be suing when they've done nothing wrong.

Sorry, I disagree and in fact the banks have done something wrong.

I will go through it later

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can disagree but when you try it you will find out.

sue a bank and lose and tell me they don't close your account.

I'll wait.

Edited by jk2054

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant close the account as that is retaliatory action and the authorities will eat them for breakfast as they did all those that carried out such a move during the bank charges era.

dx

 

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry no offence to anyone who has contributed to this thread, I'm so confused. Should I take Samsung to Small Claims Court or take action against Barclays? 

I still haven't had a response from Samsung regarding the ANR number, however I don't know how to push Barclays in carrying out checks as I was clearly told Barclays don't do such searches!

So I'm currently filling out the Small Claims Court pro forma and also the Financial Ombudsman complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry that you are getting confused. I am not surprised because you are getting conflicting advice.

Whatever, you should pay attention to the site team members here.

So I did ask you to wait a while for a reply later and you don't seem to be doing that.

I suggest that you hang on instead of leaping in feet first

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...