Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Confused with defaults on record


tezza1234
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3090 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There is , I believe an appeal going through the courts about this very issue.

 

In the original claim the judge accepted the assertion that it was the date the default notice was issued

 

Also , it needs to be remembered that the date of entry on a credit file can have no bearing on the actual date of default, the two things are different.

 

Personally i would expect the claimant in the above case to fold prior to court as the chances of losing and setting precedent could be too costly

 

I try to look at it as the time starts when the balance falls due so it can depend on the actual contract . My Capital one credit card says that 'if you do not pay your monthly payment on time [.....] we will give you at least one months notice to put right any remedial breach ' . Working on that , assuming you made a payment on the date the statement was issued and then no more, it could be almost 3 months before they were entitled , by the contract to demand full payment ( Next statement due in 1 month, say 25 days to make minimum payment then another month to put it right)

 

It always helps if you still have the original default notice as banks do not generally keep copies, just references in their comms log that one was sent. That is why, if I received a LBA of any type i would be sending a SAR to the OC as well as responding to the LBA

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i just need ome clarification please.

 

I know a debt becomes SB after 6 years, which means the debt is still there, its just not legally enforcable any more, my question is, is this 6 years from last payment, or 6 years from the date of default on the credit reference files.

 

I have some debts, which i remember the last payment made was in 2008, yet on the CR its says default date 2010, we are talking 2 years difference here from what i know and what they are saying.

 

Thanks in advance :)

 

If you did not pay anything or acknowledge the debts after the correct default date, then the 6 years will go back to whatever the default date should be per the accounts terms and conditions. For most credit accounts, the default date will be within about 3 months of the last bill or payment not being made.

 

You need to get in touch with the original creditors to obtain the information, so you can get the default dates corrected. If you are correct with the 2008 date, then those default dates should not be on your credit record. If the debts have been sold on to debt collectors, you would not alert them, by contacting original creditors for info. So you coukd safely send off data protection subject access request letters for copies of statements of account, any default or termination notices issued.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is , I believe an appeal going through the courts about this very issue.

 

In the original claim the judge accepted the assertion that it was the date the default notice was issued

 

Also , it needs to be remembered that the date of entry on a credit file can have no bearing on the actual date of default, the two things are different.

 

Personally i would expect the claimant in the above case to fold prior to court as the chances of losing and setting precedent could be too costly

 

I try to look at it as the time starts when the balance falls due so it can depend on the actual contract . My Capital one credit card says that 'if you do not pay your monthly payment on time [.....] we will give you at least one months notice to put right any remedial breach ' . Working on that , assuming you made a payment on the date the statement was issued and then no more, it could be almost 3 months before they were entitled , by the contract to demand full payment ( Next statement due in 1 month, say 25 days to make minimum payment then another month to put it right)

 

It always helps if you still have the original default notice as banks do not generally keep copies, just references in their comms log that one was sent. That is why, if I received a LBA of any type i would be sending a SAR to the OC as well as responding to the LBA

 

Is there any public information on this please fletch ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CitizenB

To the best of my knowledge the info came from another forum however the solicitor involved in the appeal is not affiliated to any one, she is a solicitor who was involved in the carey case . I will try to find out a little more if I can but again as far as I know it is being done either Pro Bono or on a CFA

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until any appeal sets precedent the situation still remains the same, the cause of action being when the last contractual payment was missed. The County Court does not set Precedent, only the appellate court can do that. Stare decisis.

 

The only exception will be a specific contractual obligation in the contract terms and conditions and being allowed to terminate an agreement

 

BMW Financial Services (GB) Ltd v Hart [2012] EWCA Civ 1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering, if i have a default on my CR but then i come to an arrangement to start paying it off, will it still be marked as default until 100% cleared (then i assume its moved to settled) or will it be changed to some other status as opposed to default.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will show as defaulted and possibly payment arrangement in place.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

but wil vanish from your file on the defaults 6th birthday

regardless to if you pay or not

 

 

which debt is this please?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if i jhave one that is say 2 years old for a modest amount £400 say, even though it is currently listed as defaulted, is it worth me paying it off, even if only £20 a month ior something, will my credit rating improve just because i am deciding to pay it off and not ignoring it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if i jhave one that is say 2 years old for a modest amount £400 say, even though it is currently listed as defaulted, is it worth me paying it off, even if only £20 a month ior something, will my credit rating improve just because i am deciding to pay it off and not ignoring it.

 

No

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots of pdl companies are writing debts off due to irresponsible lending...

 

 

who was the oc?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I am better off ignoring it

 

No!

 

Avoiding debts isn't the best way to go about it.

 

As DX says a lot of PDL coys are writing these debts off.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather confusing and contradictory to some above statements

 

Anyhow, it turns out i was wrong,

they are not PDL debts that are current,

 

i did have some but it turns out they have been written off, on noodle at least,

 

I think maybe getting a experian one will help to see the ful extent of file, as noodle is not 100% accurate is it.

 

I have 2 long standing defaults due to drop of file in the next 5-6 months which equates to more than 4k of debt, so that will help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather confusing and contradictory to some above statements.

 

Not at all, you asked if it would improve your CRF, if you began paying it off, the answer is no, once the default is on your CRF it is there for 6 years whether you pay anything towards it or not, no one said ignore it?

 

You can send experian £2 and get a hard copy of your credit file, which should be more accurate and up to date yes.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...