Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre   Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 22 May 2024   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300  and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984.   What is the total value of the claim? £385   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier    Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably    Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No   Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier   What was the date of your last payment? Never    Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No  
    • Their FAQs state - Cancellations and modifications If your booking has been cancelled, Booking.com refunds you immediately. The processing time may take 7 to 10 days and depends on your bank. If you have questions, contact your bank directly. I'm a regular Booking.com and AirBnB user.  The former have never cancelled.  The latter have and my money was refunded immediately (not that that helps you as we're not talking about AirBnB!) Best to check with your bank and see (a) if you did pay in advance and (b) if it has been refunded. Also, have you received a message from Booking.com officially stating the cancellation?
    • I'm not up to date with the Legal Aid rules but I'm not sure that many people qualify. HB
    • You question timescales a bit in thread - From my experience, defaulting everything and ignoring all non PAP letters, while making no payments: - 18 months to LOC - further 18 months to be at court Most are still silent 3 years in though!. If making token payments, court, if ever would be 4-5-6 years from now - Hope that helps. My debt is similar, I started it 2021 and wouldn't believe I'm already over half way through default period. You need to make the decisions but follow advice already given in this thread, and you will be fine. Best time to plant a tree was yesterday, second best time is today. Good luck BT  
    • ah ok honeybee, no harm intended - I'll do that, I wonder whether there's any benefit to be had by applying for legal Aid as opposed to NWNF, it's about 6 months since this incident took place, so time to get the ball rolling
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New bedroom tax


time4change2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My gran has a 2 bedroom flat and her son lives with her aswell and he also works,Grans housing benefit is not affected,I thought her HB would be affected because she has her son there who works full time but he doesn't have to pay any rent??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My gran has a 2 bedroom flat and her son lives with her aswell and he also works,Grans housing benefit is not affected,I thought her HB would be affected because she has her son there who works full time but he doesn't have to pay any rent??

 

Bedroom tax only affects people of working age.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was speaking with a legal expert friend of mine the other day, and with the government losing one of the bedroom tax court cases last week then they are going to have a hell of a job in defending the 10 cases coming up in May. It is obvious no one thought any of this through and the government should have announced in the budget it would be put on hold for a year until the court cases have finished.

 

Is there a link to this case please ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This bedroom 'tax' is seriously flawed & complex though isn't it. A seriously over weight (no other health problems) 50 odd year old still living in a 5 bed house with no extra rent to pay (yes I know them) yet a 50 odd year old widow on the news tonight in a 2 bed bungalow is packing up (granted she's been lucky to find a swap on home swapper to a smaller place) but a 2 bed bungalow??? what use is that to a family? Round here the requirement for bungalows is 50+ how many 50+ folk have dependent children still at home. It doesn't make much sense to me at the moment tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This bedroom 'tax' is seriously flawed & complex though isn't it. A seriously over weight (no other health problems) 50 odd year old still living in a 5 bed house with no extra rent to pay (yes I know them) yet a 50 odd year old widow on the news tonight in a 2 bed bungalow is packing up (granted she's been lucky to find a swap on home swapper to a smaller place) but a 2 bed bungalow??? what use is that to a family? Round here the requirement for bungalows is 50+ how many 50+ folk have dependent children still at home. It doesn't make much sense to me at the moment tbh.

 

I don't understand the point you're making - if both have no one else living there, then they would both be suject to bedroom tax.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

The second room could be used for a carer?

 

Someone living alone in a 5 bed house would only need one bedroom for a carer, even if one bedroom was converted - say to a lift, that is still two extra bedrooms subject to bedroom tax.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked my MP if he was paying bedroom tax on his second home seeing as we the tax payer are paying for his second home and if we are all in it together then there should be no diffetence between social housing and mps second homes.

MPs recently asked for a 50% rise in second home allowance.

So they kick us in the balls and run off with our money. Again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked my MP if he was paying bedroom tax on his second home seeing as we the tax payer are paying for his second home and if we are all in it together then there should be no diffetence between social housing and mps second homes.

MPs recently asked for a 50% rise in second home allowance.

So they kick us in the balls and run off with our money. Again.

 

Bedroom tax only applies to council tenants and those claiming housing benefit. It does not apply to privately own homes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand the point you're making - if both have no one else living there, then they would both be suject to bedroom tax.

 

Only the widow is subject to the bedroom tax.

That's the point I was making...

Link to post
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight. Money is being taken off of poor housing benefit claimants who are considered to have too big a home....and yet money is being given by the government so that well off people can buy a bigger home.

 

yes.

 

and meanwhile noone bats an eyelid as if they blind to the truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only the widow is subject to the bedroom tax.

That's the point I was making...

 

If both live alone in social housing then they are both subject to the bedroom tax.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh right, the local news were lying then lol

 

And both in their 50's not pension age.

 

Yep, reporters often lie or bend the truth. Could be that the true story is that the woman in the five bed house only pays bedroom tax for two extra bedrooms, but not the other two (as the max is for two bedrooms). Or has been awarded an amount from the discretionary fund due to adaptations. Also there is always the typical agenda of portraying the money grabbing, lazy, obese person in contrast to the poor, put upon, widow. Just another example of playing different groups against each other.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, reporters often lie or bend the truth. Could be that the true story is that the woman in the five bed house only pays bedroom tax for two extra bedrooms, but not the other two (as the max is for two bedrooms). Or has been awarded an amount from the discretionary fund due to adaptations. Also there is always the typical agenda of portraying the money grabbing, lazy, obese person in contrast to the poor, put upon, widow. Just another example of playing different groups against each other.

 

yeah I dont trust the media.

 

I rang up a hotline a while back for a documentary on benefit fraud, I asked if they would show both sides of the story to which they said yes, however when I told them I am happy to talk about the other side (people wrongfully denied benefit) they lost all interest in me. I would never have really proceeded with it tho as I dont want my personal details given to any reporter even if they appear friendly to the cause as nonne can be trusted, but I was testing the waters to see how they would react.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, reporters often lie or bend the truth. Could be that the true story is that the woman in the five bed house only pays bedroom tax for two extra bedrooms, but not the other two (as the max is for two bedrooms). Or has been awarded an amount from the discretionary fund due to adaptations. Also there is always the typical agenda of portraying the money grabbing, lazy, obese person in contrast to the poor, put upon, widow. Just another example of playing different groups against each other.

 

possibly the first person is not claiming HB and therefore not affected by bedroom tax, this would explain why she does not have any extra rent to pay

 

would be interesting to see link to original article

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

possibly the first person is not claiming HB and therefore not affected by bedroom tax, this would explain why she does not have any extra rent to pay

 

 

Yes another 'bending of the truth'. sadly, the end result of these types of news stories is that some woman ends up being harrassed and having bricks through her windows.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

possibly the first person is not claiming HB and therefore not affected by bedroom tax, this would explain why she does not have any extra rent to pay

 

would be interesting to see link to original article

 

Both claiming housing benefit, the widow wasn't on an article, her story was on the local news on ITV here in the south east.The obese lady is a 'friends' mother. I think the discretionary payment thing must have come into play then, because she is definitely not having to pay any bedroom tax. But apparently there have been adaptions made in the house in the past. Her daughter isn't happy because she is also in a 5 bed, in the same estate & yet because only 3 kids still live at home she has to pay the bedroom tax. I don't get the feeling they are a close family! She said 'I don't see why they can't put her in a bungalow somewhere!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both claiming housing benefit, the widow wasn't on an article, her story was on the local news on ITV here in the south east.The obese lady is a 'friends' mother. I think the discretionary payment thing must have come into play then, because she is definitely not having to pay any bedroom tax. But apparently there have been adaptions made in the house in the past. Her daughter isn't happy because she is also in a 5 bed, in the same estate & yet because only 3 kids still live at home she has to pay the bedroom tax. I don't get the feeling they are a close family! She said 'I don't see why they can't put her in a bungalow somewhere!'

 

Reversing the adaptations may be prohibitively expensive, especially if adaptations would need to be made at a new property.

 

It makes me sad that so many people's reaction is to somehow try to blame the person who is 'better off' than they are, rather than put the blame where it should be. While we're all griping at each other, we're not taking the fight to the government.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reversing the adaptations may be prohibitively expensive, especially if adaptations would need to be made at a new property.

 

It makes me sad that so many people's reaction is to somehow try to blame the person who is 'better off' than they are, rather than put the blame where it should be. While we're all griping at each other, we're not taking the fight to the government.

 

True say. And it's dividing families too now, that's good for the government though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...