Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins in Westminster - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest PPI Reclaiming, got CCJ, who gets it.


kken67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have already submitted a ppi claim to Natwest which I believe is with the calculations dept!

 

2 questions really.

1) They have just requested authority from my husband as the main policy holder which has really bugged me

as this is the first time since the claim was submitted so surely they should have requested this before. Delay tactics?

 

2) We are on a DMP with cccs atm and the company I am claiming against are 1 of our creditors.

The claims are for 4 closed loan accounts.

The remaining loan account has already been ccj'd and has a court order to pay a set amount each month.

 

My quextion is,

can they or are they likely to offset any claim award against this account with a court ordered payment in place already.

 

I could really do with the payment to fix a few house problems and fix my car which I need for work.

 

any remaining would go to our credittors but I think it should go pro rata not just to natwest.

 

Have any of you guys had the cheque straight to you?

 

I don't intend to waste the money but think it should be my decision who get what!

 

I am also considering a self managed dmp as I don't think cccs have helped that much and were useless when natwest took us to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who has requested your OH's authority?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest, albeit through RBS reclaiming team.

 

I started the claim by phone at the beginning of November and was told they had to respond by 6th January 2013.

 

On 18th December I received a letter saying they needed the mainpolicy holders authority.

 

I rang up and they wouldnt tell me anything more even though they had been quite happily dealing with me prior to this.

 

I sent signed authority by fax straight away,

rang to confirm they had received it to be told the person dealing was a Paul Woods in calculations.

 

They told me I couldnt speak direct to him as that dept didnt take outside calls but they would send an email through to him.

 

I have since phoned to be told he hasnt responded and must be on annual leave.

 

Cant seem to get any joy at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i find it always better to use the paper route when claiming

 

FOS CQ etc

 

see the links below.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am (I think) towards the end of a PPI claim over 4 rollover loans with Natwest. They have asked for a signature from the main policy holder but that had to be sent to the calculations team. This suggests to me that they are calculating redress. They have until 6th Jan to respond but obviously this may be delayed a little because of the info they requested.

 

 

However, atm we are under the CCCS dmp and our main creditor is Natwest. Having said that, they obtained a CCJ and also a final charging order last year but the court ruled that they couldnt do anything if we continued to pay an agreed amount per month which we have done religiously since. The court also said Natwest and ourselves could not alter this amount without a further court order.

 

The loan involved is not one of the loans we are claiming ppi back from, they are all long closed loan accounts. Can they or do you think it is likely they will try to offset against the outstanding account.

 

I am just thinking they wouldnt be able to with the court ordering the amount to be repaid but could well be being naive. I have read somewhere about only offsetting against notified arrears and they havent notified arrears in writing but also that they would have to refund direct to us the interest. Is this right? Also, I would like the opportunity to share the money pro rata between all our creditors.

 

Tbh, I could really do with some of it direct to us to do some household repairs and also get my car fixed. I am not thinking of frittering it away anyway. Have any of you received the cheque direct to you when you are on a DMP? Any advice would be gratefully received. Thanks all x

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, yes.. this is an awkward one I think.

 

Yes, they can offset on notified arrears only - I am not quite sure what happens where you have a judgment in place.

 

I will try and find someone who might be able to offer more advice, but my thoughts are..

 

The judgment has turned an unsecured loan into a secured loan with priority status. So when looking at your budget, it might be claimed that the Judgment has priority.

 

However, there is a remarkable lack of joined up thinking in banks.. one department not speaking to another - so chances are as the judgment is probably being dealt with by the legal team, and the loans you are reclaiming PPI on were paid up - there might be no obvious connection and you will receive the refund.

 

From what you say, the implication is that the loans were in joint names. Was the debt the judgment was obtained on, a Joint debt ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As court has ordered fixed payments not to be varied exept by leave of the court, would they not have to make an application for offsetting?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well being on a DMP make no odds to if/if not you get it.

 

how many debts sre on this plan and what are they

 

have you or anyone ever checked they are ligit & those being paid have A LEGAL RIGHT to demand/have payments through CCCS?

CCCS certainly DONT.

 

was PENALTY charges and PPI reclaiming looked into before it went CCCS.

 

you need to list your debts.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I too was thinking they would have to apply to the courts and maybe they wouldnt bother.

 

Also, when I went into Natwest a few years ago, there was no current loan account listed on their system

or infact a current account (which had an overdraft) and is part of the same ccj/final charge they obtained last year

which makes me think/hope they might not marry them all together.

 

If they do and somehow get to offset, am I right in thinking they cant take the interest aswell?

 

DX - There are approximately 15 creditors in total on my DMP totalling 30,000

most in the region of £600 or so

but Natwest are the biggest by far with an outstanding debt of £10,000 (loan/overdraft)

 

I am in the process of trying to set up a self managed DMP and am taking your advice to CCA them all.

 

Was thinking of leaving Natwest till they have dealt with the PPI claims as dont want to start them looking at things too closely.

 

I would still like to know if anyone has received their claim cheque direct whilst on a DMP.

 

Feel a little overwhelmed so no doubt will be back for advice. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said being on a DMP makes no diff at all to if you get it or not

nor

to if they offset or not.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As brig says, they'd have to apply to the court to offset and you would have the opportunity to put your objections to this. I somehow doubt they'd do this.

 

When you respond to them tell them that you require your refund by cheque.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, that was what I was thinking! I will see how they respond first and go from there. Will they say they intend to offset in any offer letter. I have read somewhere that some people have just had cheques sent straight out without responding to offer letters. I am keeping my fingers crossed as could really do with a little monetary lift right now!:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO you are more likely to get what you want if you tell them. They may have a different take on this or assume you will want it offset as many possibly would, so you must make your requirements very clear. They aren't mind readers and it could be harder to get a cheque without a long fight if they have already offset.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could well be right here!

 

 

do I contact them now and say I want the money by cheque as I no longer have a natwest account

(the newest loan account and my old current account don't seem to show

as they are being dealt with by the legal dept)

 

 

do I mention not offsetting against that account even though they may not know about it!

 

 

Also, I do have an RBS account

what about asking for it to be sent direct to that account.

 

 

They seem to be able to do that quicker than raising a cheque.

 

 

I have no debts with RBS and was told by an employee of RBS,

a friend that they do not offset between RBS and Natwest even though they are under the same umbrella.

 

 

Even if worst comes to worst,does the interest still come to me.

May be that that amount will suffice to fix what I need to! I really appreciate your help.

Thank you x

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will more than likely write to you again with a figure and also ask you to sign an acceptance form. I think that would be the point to advise you would like a cheque.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received 4 offers (goodwill) from Natwest totalling just over £2600 against closed loan accounts.

 

However, we have another loan account which is with their legal dept and part of our DMP.

It has already been to court and they got a CCJ/final charging order with a court decision that we pay a set amount each month which cannot be altered without referal to the courts.

 

I am not sure that when Natwest general admin check they can find that account anyway.

 

Obviously we would like the cheques ourselves.

 

Can they offset against that o/s account but perhaps as importantly,

dont they have to send us the interest anyway, seem to have read that somewhere before.

 

That would amount to about £900 and I could really use that even if they offset the other money.

 

Please advise where I stand, in particular the interest amount.

 

Thanks so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well effectivily the CCJ account is 'paid' via a court order, it is not 'arrears'

 

they can only offset against notified arrears

 

these typically come mentioned on a NOSIN letter

 

notice of sums in arrears.

 

now this DMP, not fee paying i hope?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have today sent acceptance letters back and popped into Natwest

and just asked cashier if I had any accounts still with them.

She said no but you do have your mortgage account.

 

I have just thought, this account has arrears but agreed overpayments for a while.

Will they offset against a mortgage account?

If not, I am fairly confident they will pay straight to us.

 

Still having problems finding out if the stat interest will be paid to us, anyone know anything?

 

Oh, and dx, the dmp is not fee paying, its with cccs but am in process of sorting self managed.

 

Also sent acceptance letters 1st class recorded so hopefully they dont get 'lost'

as every fax I have sent them so far they havent been able to locate. Just delay tactics, i reckon.

 

Anybody have any updates on how quickly RBS/Natwest are paying out atm.

The letter says the stat 28 days but wondered what it is in reality!

 

I will be using the largest proportion against debts if we receive it all back

but also fixing car so am anxious to sort it all out.

 

Thanks for everybodys help,

really appreciated.

Will update as soon as anything happens.

 

Have today sent acceptance letters back to RBS hq for Natwest loan ppi claim.

 

 

Just wondering in reality how long it is taking right now before people are getting their cheques.

 

 

I know it says 28 days but wondered what people were experiencing atm. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

dont know if anyone has any idea how to effectively fight this but worth a shot!

 

Just to fill in the background.

 

I am on a dmp with cccs but in the process of going it alone.

 

My biggest creditor Natwest, wasnt happy about the time it would take to pay back via dmp

so went for and got a final charging order effectively changing the unsecured loan to a secured loan

 

when the judge agreed the fco he specifically said that we just had to pay the same amount per month

we had been paying through cccs

and neither natwest or ourselves could alter that without prior agreement of the court.

 

Fast forward to my recent ppi reclaim which was awarded 29/1.

 

Natwest just sent the interest to us and paid the reclaim to our loan account

which incidently was not one of the loans we were reclaiming on.

 

Now, they are saying they can offset

but my logic would say that the courts have determined and ordered all future credits to this debts

and they are acting illegally by crediting the reclaim to the account.

 

I dont know how to word a letter or if anyone else would see it the way i do. Any advice?

 

I am not looking to squander the money and will pay other things so could do with getting it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I suppose your logic would think that way.

 

Though I always find it interesting the way that though it is our money in the bank,

the bank seems to think it is their money.

 

The money they owed from the missold PPI was your money and the loan account is their money .

 

There have been many arguments over the years on this Forum about just this situation.

 

You are luckier than most insofar as the bank have at least repaid the interest to you.

 

The bank could argue that they couldn't offset against the account with the CO because the Judge had specifically stated

that neither you nor the bank could alter the repayments without the Court's agreement.

 

I don't see much mileage in pursuing your line of argument as you do appear to be well in debt with the bank despite not providing any figures.

And at least you have reduced the amount of your debt by a considerable amount.

[it is arguable of course that you would not be in so much financial trouble had the bank not added PPI in the first place.]

 

Perhaps rather than going down your proposed route you

could look instead at reclaiming your bank charges using hardship as your basis for your action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the 8% stat int is your they cannot touch it.

 

as for tyhe offset

 

 

unless a creditor sends a notice of arrears

 

they should not be willy nilly off setting anyhow.

 

NOTIFIED ARREARS only.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...