Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is essential that you find out where the car is.  It is also essential to find out whether what you signed was an authorisation What precisely it was that you authorised.  I expect it was an authorisation and it certainly is going to be a big problem that you didn't read what you signed.  However you must find out and you must do it as quickly as possible.  If necessary start telephoning people but read our customer services guide first.  But then render everything in writing  
    • There are 19 documents received from SARS request, spread out over 2 messages too big to put all on one. I have also received the Notification of allocation to the small claims track hearing for beginning nov 2024 SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-11.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-12.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-13.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-14.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-15.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-16.pdf
    • 050124 DcbLegal-1_1.pdf 050124 DcbLegal-2_1.pdf 121223 DCbLegal_1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-2.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-3.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-4.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-5.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-6.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-7.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-8.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-9.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-10.pdf
    • From the Law Gazette. Paula Vennells had faith in her lawyers - and threw them under the bus. Post Office Inquiry: Paula Vennells trusted her lawyers and then threw them under the bus | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK If we are to believe the former chief executive, she was simply too trusting of her general counsel.  
    • Thank you dx. Not very nice reading, but I have learnt a bit, I will need to go over some of them again later.  Something I picked up from those posts are Auxillis use of tick boxes and electronic signatures.   I need to find out what the tow truck driver made me sign for.  He put the car on the trailer and locked it down, then got a phone in a big protective case out and just handed it to me. I didn't even think what I was signing, I presumed it was related to the condition of the car on retrieval from the ditch and their collection and assumption of responsibility for the insurance company.    unclebulgaria67, I struggle to easily write concise, to the point posts.  I thought that my initial post was already too long and wordy so tried to keep it brief and to the point. I didn't write every moment of the accident the way I told the police or insurers because most of it would be a waste of your time as my innocence is not my concern. The other party fled the scene.  My immediate concern is my car being taken without consent, stored where it will accrue charges, get treated in any manner of ways because they assume its getting written off and dont need to look after it and then possibly taken to a car auction site where I will have to pay additional fees to get it back if it is declared a write off. I am also in increasing amounts of pain in my lower back and neck and ever increasing sense of injustice and foreboding.    I do not see how my original post could go 50/50 personally, but I am reading my words with the images I have in my head, so have taken your warning on board and will make sure I don't mess up on any other documents.    So as far as I know someone from Vizion who have been hired by Auxillis is going to assess my vehicle at some point in the future.  The form I filled in for Vizion said that an approved assessor would attend my house to assess if the car is worthy of being repaired.  My car is not at my house, why the discrepancy? I agree that it is likely that they are not going to want to repair my car, I think it is worth it, I know what I have done to keep it sound, but market value and the astronomical cost of repairs...  Which is why I am worried that my car has been pulled in to a scam against my consent. How much is it going to cost me to get it back when it could be sitting on my drive.  It is just being used to charge someone storage, then will go to copart and they will charge someone storage, then they will charge me a release fee and I will have to find a way to get it back to my house which will cost more money.  All when I repeatedly requested that the car be taken off the truck when it was outside my house.    I have advised Auxillis that I repeatedly requested my car be taken off the tow truck outside my house and was not listened to.  I stated that I was left feeling that my car had been taken without my consent and was not provided a valid reason for them keeping the car.  I want to know where my car is, why it is there and would like it brought back to my house to await their assessor who already thinks the car is at my house.  Sorry bankfodder i forgot to ask who authorised it, but i will ask. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3852 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 421
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Question: I have a Bankruptcy Petition served on me. I just found out in the Statement of the Process Server that he posted the first appointment letter through letter box. Not by first class post as it says in the rules. Further the statement copy in court has been amended slightly re the time of appointment as opposed to the original(He altered the evidence).This was his statement of substituted service. As I was away from home I did not see the SD until the 21 days had lapsed so I have not applied to set aside but I have sent in my opposition to the BP. Can I get the BP thrown out because of the above or is the serving of the SD now irrelevant because I have now moved to the next stage? or am I just being pedantic?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE after Crapquest threatened to send me an SD i CCAed them ..Its took 2 mth ..today i receive the Same Agreement that robbersway sent ..still showing an account number i dont reconize ..also you can see that Crapquest has printed it off as my address is done the sameway has the letters they send me has..Robbersway version was the same has their headed letters ..

 

There is no sigs anywhere and it has current T & Cs..Has any of you fantastic Caggers got a letter i can send them to shut them up ??

 

I can see now why Robbersway sold the debt to capquest whilst it was in disput

 

Thanks guys xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they sold out to Aviemore all account numbers were changed apparently,

I sent this and they have gone away, for good I hope.

 

Dear xx xxxx

Re: Client Reference Number, xxxxx

On 12/04/2009 I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. This was signed for as delivered on the 13/04/2009.

In your letter dated xx/09/2010 I finally received the said document,5 months since after my initial request.

I have read the document you've sent and have reason to believe it may be a re-construction. You therefore need then to confirm one way or the other that it is in fact a true copy of an agreement for the alleged account.

Under CPUTR, I believe you’re obliged to tell me.

If necessary I will travel at my own expense to your offices in Fleet to examine the original document myself.

I look forward to your reply within 7 days.

Yours Sincerely

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much Hardup ..I will use that for sure

 

Yes i understand that the account numbers changed after change over ..i never ever received a new card with the new number as my account was closed by them,,Shudnt we of had a new agreememnt to sign if that was the case ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't either but if you still had an alleged debt then you got a new account number, I was paying a token payment every month and after they changed account numbers my payments were going missing,

There does seem to be some confusion as to whether you should get a new agreement when a new card (Token) is issued.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep the same happened to me ..was payin £1 per mth then all of a sudden i had a letter telling me..that on this occasion we hav received your £1 whatta bout the other 10 ive sent..thats when it got taken over!! even if they dont needa new agreement they shud still send one with a sig on..mine has been going on since 2008..If any of them had anything ligit ..why waste time on rubbish ..and not issus a summons??:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE

 

well i sent Crappy the letter in post 6 thanks to hardupnotfedup

 

and i got a letter of crappy today saying (further to your recent correspondence could i pls send them by 9th may full details of my dispute Blah Blah this is not a demand but a request

 

LOL what planet are they on ..They know full well what im asking in last letter..why do they just ignore you ?? they hav not even mentioned nothing to do with the last letter ..IDIOTS lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi babydoll, found my way here.

 

There is a letter that you can send, but it should have been some time ago, or maybe you did send one and they lost it???????????

 

What stage are you at now. Has it or is it going to court or has an arrangement been made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi vint

 

Thanks for popping over ..:)..I had alsorts of threats from blair etc ..then nov 2008..iqor got hold of it sent them the dispute letter has halifax didnt send me a CCA after 12 mths,,then they send me CCA told them Application wasnt acceptable..they said they was working in good faith for hali and if im not happy to contact hali direct i did so ,,they went away ..then december2008 gets a letter from Capquest ..told them it was in dispute with halifax they closed there filethen march 2009 ..gets a demand from robinsonway ..told them it was indisput they went away ..not heard any more since the last letter from robbers onMay 2009..

 

 

no court nothing ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I would be inclined to hang on until they contact you again.

 

If they do, then write to whoever contacts you, stating that the agreement has been unlawfully rescinded. We can deal with that letter when you are contacted next, assuming that you have not made any payments since the DN.

 

It is not wise to state that you have already sent the UR letter. It would be fraudulent and if you get caught out, there will be severe reprocussions.

 

Just keep it in your mind as being UR and that they should know that as a sophisticated financial organisation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive never sent the unlawful recinded letter

 

Halifax let me pay £1.00 a mth for 3 mths starting oct 2007my first payment was Nov 2008..they then reveiwed it after 2 mths..I know ive not payed anything since March 2008 ..am i in the ****ty lol???

Edited by babydoll0141917
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that there is any rhyme or reason to their actions.

 

I think they go through the process of using several DCA's, then either give up or go to court. It may depend on the card ballance. If it is too low, then they just cut their losses.

 

I heard of one case late last year, where they issued a county court claim and the defendant put in an embarrassed defence, so they caved in and dropped the case.

 

There is no telling what they will do though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

UPDATE..Well its been 15 mths that i told robbers way this account was still in dispute with Halifax...Today i hav received a letter from IQOR tell me that halifax has passed to them to collect on and not to write to halifax as they will only pass back to iqor..iqor was one on the first to collect on this acount way befor robbers come on the scene now its back with them..they basically askind for full amount if not they will assess my financial circumstances and i may be able to hav a SUBSTANTIAL discount....OOER misses..Do i ignor iqor or do i reply ??

 

Cheers guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

how do i subscribe to this thread?? in a similar situation with haliprats and all the dca's youve mentioned... just received solicitors letter from Geoffrey Parker Bourne on behalf of iQor today... saying legal action pending... I'd send bemused letter to iqor and they replied saying haliprats said they'd complied with CCA and they were to carry on pursuing the debt.... GPB must be thier next scare tactic...? it says I've got to contact GPB direct and not iQor... do i send similar bemused letter to GPB ??? hows everyone getting on with thier stuff... any more news?

 

Tigger :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...