
vint1954
Banned-
Content Count
4,549 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
vint1954 last won the day on February 7 2010
vint1954 had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
1,431 ExcellentAbout vint1954
-
Rank
Banned
-
Satander/cohen claimform - 2010 Store card debt
vint1954 replied to Cena34's topic in Financial Legal Issues
Looks OK Cena -
MKDP/barclaycard claimform - will need some help please!
vint1954 replied to Dotty50's topic in Barclaycard
Here you go Dotty, http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Mercantile/2011/B3.html Hae you tried more coal in the Laptop! Usually works for me. -
Satander/cohen claimform - 2010 Store card debt
vint1954 replied to Cena34's topic in Financial Legal Issues
Indeed M1. N244 costs £40 -
There is a defined requirement for a valid Default Notice to lawfully terminate an Account whilst in default. Notwithstanding the matters pleaded above, the Claimant must under Section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 serve a valid Default Notice before they can demand early payment of sums not yet due under a Regulated Credit Agreement. I refer the Court to the recent ruling of HHJ Chambers QC sitting as a Judge of the High Court in Keith Harrison vs Link Financial Limited EWHC 2011 B3 where at paragraph 75 when addressing a default notice he stated……… The notice of enforcemen
-
Couple of points that may help your WS, if you have pleaded them: In any event I can show the Court that on balance the documents relied upon by the Claimant do not satisfy the requirements of s78 and I will refer the Court to the case of Carey vs HSBC [2009] EWHC 3417 (QB) and also the Court of Appeal ruling in Devendra Kotecha vs Phoenix Recoveries [2011] EWCA Civ 105 which show that the documents the Claimant provided do not comply with s78 (1) and accordingly the Claimant is not entitled to judgment. There are a number of reasons why the documents produced by the Claimant do
-
Recieved SD from Hamptons, Lowell portfolio l LTD
vint1954 replied to will lliw's topic in Financial Legal Issues
You could have gone on the disputed debt as well. It is filed now so just sit tight. -
Recieved SD from Hamptons, Lowell portfolio l LTD
vint1954 replied to will lliw's topic in Financial Legal Issues
Indeed will. Hopefully the judge will throw the SD out,as they have nothing else to go on. Judges do not like the SD system used as a means of debt enforcement. -
Recieved SD from Hamptons, Lowell portfolio l LTD
vint1954 replied to will lliw's topic in Financial Legal Issues
You would have hoped so. -
Recieved SD from Hamptons, Lowell portfolio l LTD
vint1954 replied to will lliw's topic in Financial Legal Issues
Will, Did the court suggest that they had not even received the SD application -
Recieved SD from Hamptons, Lowell portfolio l LTD
vint1954 replied to will lliw's topic in Financial Legal Issues
It appears that they have sent the SD to the wrong court.