Jump to content
CAG Ticker
Car dealer who sold death traps and forged court papers ×
Have we helped you – would you like to make a donation to us?
Car dealer who sold death traps and forged court papers

vint1954

Banned
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    4,549

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

vint1954 last won the day on February 7 2010

vint1954 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,431 Excellent

1 Follower

About vint1954

  • Rank
    Banned
  1. Anna1s1 started following vint1954
  2. vint1954
    Looks OK Cena
  3. vint1954
    Here you go Dotty, http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Mercantile/2011/B3.html Hae you tried more coal in the Laptop! Usually works for me.
  4. vint1954
    Indeed M1. N244 costs £40
  5. vint1954
    The Brandon v Amex appeal, states that iregularities within the DN are NOT de-minimis
  6. vint1954
    There is a defined requirement for a valid Default Notice to lawfully terminate an Account whilst in default. Notwithstanding the matters pleaded above, the Claimant must under Section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 serve a valid Default Notice before they can demand early payment of sums not yet due under a Regulated Credit Agreement. I refer the Court to the recent ruling of HHJ Chambers QC sitting as a Judge of the High Court in Keith Harrison vs Link Financial Limited EWHC 2011 B3 where at paragraph 75 when addressing a default notice he stated……… The notice of enforcemen
  7. vint1954
    Couple of points that may help your WS, if you have pleaded them: In any event I can show the Court that on balance the documents relied upon by the Claimant do not satisfy the requirements of s78 and I will refer the Court to the case of Carey vs HSBC [2009] EWHC 3417 (QB) and also the Court of Appeal ruling in Devendra Kotecha vs Phoenix Recoveries [2011] EWCA Civ 105 which show that the documents the Claimant provided do not comply with s78 (1) and accordingly the Claimant is not entitled to judgment. There are a number of reasons why the documents produced by the Claimant do
  8. vint1954
    Your witness statement will be crucial. Have they fully complied with any s 78 request? Was this an application form? Was the DN complient?
  9. vint1954
    You could have gone on the disputed debt as well. It is filed now so just sit tight.
  10. vint1954
    Bev, Is the evidence that the court is waiting for, connected to your CPR request?
  11. vint1954
    Your IP should be dealing with that, if you have included this debt in the IVA.
  12. vint1954
    What on earth do they mean " the defendant is put to strict proof" It is your defence, they have to prove the other way! It is not for you to prove. Idiots! ( them that is)
  13. vint1954
    Indeed will. Hopefully the judge will throw the SD out,as they have nothing else to go on. Judges do not like the SD system used as a means of debt enforcement.
  14. vint1954
    You would have hoped so.
  15. vint1954
    Will, Did the court suggest that they had not even received the SD application
  16. vint1954
    It appears that they have sent the SD to the wrong court.

Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London NW11 7PE

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...