Jump to content

Dempseyja2

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Hi I’m struggling to find 3 line defence in the search bar ( only have mobile) also is paragraph 4 of my defence still applicable Thanks
  2. thanks for the reply where is the 3 line defence i cant find it. also this is a parking awarness claim the ticket was paid for they saying it was slightly parked on a line. thanks
  3. could anyone just check this out i just need to edit a few details before submitting thanks
  4. 1. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle] 2. the Defendant is unable to admit or deny the precise times and dates he was parked in [carpark] as he has no recollection of this. The Claimant is put to strict proof of the same. 3 the defendant contends the particulars of the claim are vague in nature as what to contractual term or a contractual condition was breached 4 It is denied that the Claimant entered into a contract with the Defendant. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the carpark is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. The proper Claimant is the landowner. 5. on the date ****i sent a CPR31.14 requesting documents mentioned in particulars of the claim. PCN terms and conditions relating to reads lane blackpool proof of any condition or contractual breach they would rely on in court. contract between the landowner and the claimant. 6 BW legal have not sent any of those documents to me. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all."
  5. Hi all we need to get our defence in this week I’ve read the template defence do we admit the driver this was a claim for allegally wheel was on line all fees were paid do I ask for contract between landowner and claiment. Thanks all
  6. Name of the Claimant ? PARKING AWARENESS SERVICES claimants Solicitors: BW LEGAL Date of issue – 27TH SEPT What is the claim for – 1.the claimants claim is for the sum of £100. being monies due from the defendant to the claimant in respect of a parking charge notice (PCN) issued on __/08/2016 at time at reads ave car park Blackpool. The PCN relates to car under registration ***********. 2.the terms of the PCN allowed the defendant 28 days from the issue to pay the PCN. but the defendant failed to do so. 3.despite demands having been made the defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability. 4.the claim also includes statutory interest persuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum a daily rate of 0.02 from 13/08/2016 to 26/09/2018 being an amount of £23.23. 5.The claimant also claims £60 contractual cost pursuant to PCN terms and conditions. total claim £233.00 What is the value of the claim? £258.23 Has the claim been issued by the Private parking Company or was the PCN assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? PARKING COMPANY Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO
  7. hi all thanks for the reply ...my mates just away at the moment i will ask him which car park it was.. we was going to drive there on Wednesday we are only half hour away. we wanted to take photos of the PCN notices and the width of the white lines. he also noted it was night time when he parked and visibility wad not good when will the best time to get the defense in ?
  8. thanks for the reply date on the claim is 27nd september claim acknowledged on the 2nt october.
  9. hi could anyone help with a simple defence over 2 years ago my friend parked his car and paid for his parking ticket, a few weeks later he got a letter from parking awareness saying part of his wheel was on the white line he has ignored all correspondence from this company, apparently they have a camera on this one spot because they know its a tight handle to park. roll on 2 years they have now issued a claim through bw legal. we have read loads of complaints about this but cant find a suitable defence. particulars of their claim. 1.the claimants claim is for the sum of £100. being monies due from the defendant to the claimant in respect of a parking charge notice (PCN) issued on __/08/2016 at time at reads ave Blackpool. The PCN relates to car under registration ***********. 2.the terms of the PCN allowed the defendant 28 days from the issue to pay the PCN. but the defendant failed to do so. 3.despite demands having been made the defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability. 4.the claim also includes interest section 69 act at rate of 8% per annum a daily rate of 0.02 from 13/08/16. 5.The claimant also claims £60 contractual cost pursuant to PCN terms and conditions. total claim £233.00 my friend has acknowledged the claim on Mcol so he needs a defence especially with this contractual cost. thanks guys CPR31.4 sent to solicitors
  10. Hi didy you get a defense in on this one my friend has got the exact same claim Got a claim for apparently wheel was slightly on white line. He needs help with a defense claim is exactly same as yours. Thanks
  11. hi all manged to upload he statement...... no hfc logo on statement ...... very similar to an old connaghught statement. now the funny bit is where its says default notice fee means this statement is supposed to be from HFC. well 1st credit says they purchased this account in 2007 so why would HFC send me a statement for between 2005 to may 2010 when they wouldnt have any legal basis to do if all the rights were purchased by 1st credit. any thoughts anyone /
×
×
  • Create New...