Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HCEO clamped my car, i removed it, old Landlord got CCJ - help!


headache123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

its still me. I had lost my username hence why its not headache 123.

 

It was headache123 at Today 11:29 #107

headache123 headache123 is offline

 

Why are we back to sanepersongonemad ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

oh its because the saneperson username doesnt work on my smartphone so at 11.29 i was on my phone using the headache123 username as its autosaved, and the headache123 doesnt work on my laptop for some reason so its sanepersonthats autosaved on my laptop. hence it is saneperson at the moment as i am on my laptop.

Do you please have any advice for tomorow ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing in particular just approach it and state your side of events.....obviously you are tensed up but its very informal ..table chairs the opposition and the DJ and ...present your defence...make bullet points like a script and refer to them...listen to the DJ if you are unsure of anything ask him/her to repeat it.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

headache/saneperson.. can you please let us know how things went, please :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

just got in from a long day but definatly was the first thing on my mind. Was horrible as cl and mackenzie friend are like pitbulls but worse a i actually like all animals.

 

dj was really nice though this time but would not allow the last judgement to be raised and said this was just for further costs. cl had3 payments he wanted:-

 

1/ solicitors costs of £500 - cl never had any proper recipets and just a handwriiten piece of paper. Judge disallowed this and said this ia a small claims courts, we do not cover costs so was happy with this.

 

2/ sheriffs court fee of £60 - again not allowed as it was their choice to do this

 

3/ sheriffs office fees of £2314.73. This included dvla number plate check, waiting time, letters etc. - this was the ridiculous thing - cl was rying to make out that he would have to pay this and he has been sent letters asking for payment! judge was baffled at this as was

 

i. cl had nothing to prove this, just a breakdown of sheriffs office bailiff fees. judge even said this was all before i knew about the ccj - they said no i knew, which i didnt. i explained how is it possible tp pay £60 and then end up as a cl paying £2314 yourself? in other words they were trying to get this money ontop of the judgement for themselves! judge kept saying she was inclined to put this in my favour but they said they wouldnt let this new amount go and would pursue me for this! the stmt from the sheriffs office was from over a year ago before i knew of the ccj. cl kept arguing saying sherifss office has asked him for this amount. judge said well wheres the

letters, they didnt have any but said that the SO have said they want to be kept updated and will ask for their payment at the end of the case. judge was baffled and knew this was nonsense. Due to their insitence, the hearing was adjourned so they can get some proof fromt he sheriffs office and given back to the judge that made the initial judgemnt. i asked so much not to adjourn as the stress has made me ill but judge said she had no choice as they will not let it go :(

 

each time after the hearing end, the cl and defendant wait till iv gone and try talk to the judge! they keep doing it everytime.

the intiial judgement was for £2500, plus £150 interest which the cl had said he did not want interest for but on the form that came out with the result of teh last hearing ineterst of £150 was added. how do i query this please?

 

also i got the impression that if i dont pay the £2650, they will put the sheriffs office back onto me, but more over i dont want a ccj on my name. how long have i got before that turns into a ccj? i was waiting for the outcome of this before i made payment but my credit file is clean and its really important for me as im trying ot buy a house that it doesnt turn into adverse credit. as far as i know i currently have no ccj. i dont really have the funds, but i dont think there is any other way?

 

just get the feeling this cl aint ever going to leave me alone.

 

any help please?

Edited by stu007
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sane

 

 

I have edited your post as it was difficult to read so I have added some spaces to your post so its easier for others to read and give you advice.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am writing a cheque for the original ordered amout of £2650 today :-( i rang the court today who said a ccj order had been registered against me in may but i checked my credit file and i have nothing on there. I said this to the courts who were unsure. Yesterdays hearin was for further costs. Could it be that nothing will be registrd until the whole case is over? Cannot risk.q ccj. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone please?

also will the cl get another £2000k + to give direct to the sheriffs office which he says he has to pay? im sure this is not true. after all how can you pay a debt collector £60 and ed up with over 2k to pay yourself? anyway to stop them wasting my time also? im sick of this situation and despite paying teh order amount i dont knwo if im left with a ccj and its still not over. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have paid the amount that was on the court order. THen thats it. Its done. You need to get a certificate of satisfaction from the court. That way nothing can come back on you. If you paid the order within 28 days of the hearing, then a CCJ wont be registered.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

the court order was in june.

 

i didnt pay it then as it said 'permission to appeal refused' and i buised myself trying to get an appeal.

 

i couldnt afford any legal costs and didnt qualify for legal aid.

 

the hearing for extra costs was supposed to be in september as above but i couldnt make it due to work and it was deferred till yesterday.

 

i paid the order that was made in june today.

 

the very unfriendly court lady who i spoke to said it was registered in may

but the court order was in june so i dont think she knew what she was talikng about and she was quite rude.

 

i have nothing registered against me on my credit file......

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i paid for the trust registry england and wales orders and judgements and it says nothing registered!!!!!!!!!!! :)

 

think the court woman on the phone was just having a bad day!

 

happy and confused.

 

i had a judgment in error that is due to expire in 3 weeks and its not showing so i hope the registry is correct but all good.

 

i m so happy though. maybe il finally get some sleep. just the last sheriffs hurdle to go ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a little confused sane person.. (or not) ... I though this recent hearing was adjourned ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

the intiial order i paid.

 

this hearing was for further costs and that has been adjourned.

 

Before i knew about the ccj,

the sherrifs office visited my property,

dropped letters in and clamped my car.

 

as soon as i knew i went to court and applied of the set aside.

 

for all them visits of teh sherrifs office, the cl has a stmt form

the sherrifs office with the charges against me of over another 2k.

 

like letter delivery,

dvla check,

visit etc.

 

apparently now thre cl is saying he needs this off me (iv paid for the original order)

as he has to pay th esherrifs office

 

this as he is goign to be held accountacle to it.

 

how is that even possible?

 

so the judge in teh end said she will adjourn it whilst they wait for evidence to show this from the cl.

 

its the silliest thing iv ever heard and its being pu back to the judge who charged me the original order who i found unfair.

 

not happy about this....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

another day in court and another hearing with the unfair judge.

 

todays hearing was whether i needed to pay the cl £6000 which teh sheriffs office say i owe them apparently.

 

the judge said todays heraing was to find out if that amount is reasonable ( i have paid the £2500 order athough unfair)

 

Dont worry i was confused that how can a claimant claim on behalf of high court enforcement officers

who are not even askign me for the money!

but apparently the cl believes that he would be liable an so i shoudl pay!

 

a very unfair entire afternoon followed.

 

The judge wanted the T&Cs of the sherrifs office which the cl did not have. she tried to search it herself!

 

then allowed the mackenzie freind and teh cl to make seperate calls to the sheriifs office for the t&Cs to be emailed to her.

 

then we adjourned whilst she was going to search for it herself on the internet!

 

after an hour, She then said she could not make me pay for something that the cl had not paid.

 

The cl then argues it out.

 

Then the judge said i should pay half!

 

i said uv just changed your order.

 

she then adjourned while she wanted to look for the t &cs.

 

1 hour later, she decided taht the actual fees should eb £2700 that i owe the sheriffs office

( pls remeber i was not at the address when the s o visited or was aware of the ccj till they visited, which was set aside).

 

the sheriffs office have not asked for anything as the cl and me have been sorting this in court.

 

i dont understand how i can be made to pay for them.

 

i explained to the judge i was not aware of the ccj and hence got he stay and writ set aside

but she said as she had previously awareded the order for 2500 in cl favour so that means i am liable!

 

the end decision was that she felt the cl should have stpped the s o as although they paid £60 only for them,

the debt ran into over £6000of sherrifs letters etc for a 2500 debt.

 

the amount she felt i owed to the s o was £2700 which incudes all random fees such as levy etc which i know are not true.

 

the judge ordered that within 14 days the court will write to the so member who was dealing with the case

and ask that they should explain a witness stmt of why they felt the need to visit and a justification for their fees.

 

she said the burden was on the s o to show they are owed and felt the fees were unreasonable.

and that if me and the s o could come to an agreement then there would be no further hearing,

failing that the witness stmt from the s o would go to the courts cl and me and a further hearing would be the decider.

 

i truly cannot bear another hearing.

 

the cl and his mackenzie friend who always talks throughout were unhappy as they wanted me to pay them.

 

i asked for it to be left between me and the so but judge said no its still between cl and me.

 

i also have to pay £100 for bailiffs costs which they sent after the judgement was made,

for which i was not shown the evidence,

which again is unfair as i proved i was not living at teh address the leters were sent to.

 

now im so worried im going to end up with another 2700 to pay to the s o for a debt they are not even chasin

as apparently it will be down to the cl to pay otherwise. any advice???

 

what should i do?

 

i cant risk a ccj as im buying a house and feel its all very unfair

 

the judge initially awarded solicitors costs of £500 before i stated you cannot claim solicitors costs in a small claims court!!!

 

which she then agreed.

 

i feel i would have got less stress for murder!

 

please can someone help. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

the court date has arrived for the sherriffs office fees which the ll feels he would be liable if i didnt pay now another £6000 odd pounds.

 

I paid the judgment of £2750 even though i didnt agree just to end things but now this is on my back thanks to the landlord.

 

The so has sent a breakdown of their costs to the court but i havent got them.

 

i emailed them asking if i was liable and they said yes.

 

Id i settle out of court i can avoid eyt more stress as this has made me severley ill.

 

However, i cannot spare anymore money or have a ccj as i am trying to move house.

 

I asked the so to consider writing off the debt but they wouldn't

- i just dont know what to do anymore.

 

Iv never heard of the ll having to pay bailiff fees so holding claimant liable - he has got his money and alot alot more!

 

These are the emails i have recieved from the so - can someone pls pls help me?

 

This is the first email from yesterday where i wanted to confirm liability and this is the response i recieved:-

 

I can confirm that as the Judgment Debtor in the action you are liable for the fees of the High Court Enforcement Officer.

 

I can however confirm that in the event tha these fees are not recoverable from you then the burden for payment of the fees

does pass to the Judgment Creditor who does bear ultimate liability.

 

I can confirm that we would be prepared to reach an agreement to settle the High Court Enforcement Offices fees

and as such would invite your proposals in relation to the same.

 

This is the second email is recieved today:-

 

We acknowledge receipt of your recent e-mail and duly note your comments contained therein.

 

Concerning our fees in this matter

we would advised that these are charged in accordance with High Court Officers Regulations 2004 and reflect the work carried out.

 

Consequently same are rightly due.

 

It is correct that if Mr xxx had failed to raise the question of our fees with the court he could have been rendered liable

for same hence his request that same be included in any order.

 

In compliance with the order of the xxx County Court a full breakdown of such fees were lodged with the County Court by xxx.

 

However, in order to avoid the costs that would be incurred should a hearing be required to assess same

we wrote to you concerning the possibility of an out of court settlement.

 

Your comments regarding your financial situation are noted but would state that having rightly conducted the work

which constitutes the charges we are not willing to write these off.

 

We would however be willing to negotiate a settlement.

 

In view of the above we would request your proposals regarding the fees so that due consideration

can be given to same and thus avoiding the necessity of a court attendance.

 

Details deleted out.

working but broke,

 

just too much to cope with this situation knowing full well i am innocent

and paid the money just to close the case and still no relief.

 

Pls help :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please please please can someone help me.

 

I have paid the claimant £2750 plus costs.

 

I am being told i need to pay the sherrifs office on behalf of the claimant otherwise face going court again.

 

i dont want a ccj and am sick of this case but do not have the monies,

- this is what they want me to pay:-

 

06-09-2012 12 Compliance and Administration Fee £233.90

06-09-2012 12 DVLA Vehicle Check Fee - £15.00

12-09-2012 6.2(b) Auction Inventory Fee £149.14

12-09-2012 1 Percentage Fee £69.60

12-09-2012 2 Mileage Fee £50.00

12-09-2012 3 Seizure of Goods Fee £2.00

12-09-2012 12 Attendance to Seize Goods Fee £181.50

12-09-2012 12 Case Allocation Fee NOS £12.10

19-09-2012 12 DVLA Vehicle Check Fee - £45.00

21-09-2012 5.3(a) Attendance to Remove Fee £574.00

21-09-2012 12 Case Allocation Fee ATR £12.10

25-09-2012 12 DVLA Vehicle Check Fee - £15.00

26-09-2012 12 Enforcement Officer & Porter Wait Fee £181.50

26-09-2012 5.3(a) Attendance to Remove Fee £574.00

26-09-2012 12 Clamp Replacement Fee - £200.00

Totals £2,314.84

VAT is applicable at a rate of 20%

 

i am supposed to make them an offer or face the very very very unfair and bias judge in court again.

 

As soon as i knew a ccj was against me and was told the shrerrifs had visited

i was granted a stay at the time and

 

i also proved i was not living there at the time of the ccj.

 

However this was all overturned by the judge who helped the claimant no end

and now has encouraged them to claim this off me.

 

At my wits end - dont know what to do anymore. :sad::sad::sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hit the triangle and ask for help

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...