Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, all done as requested. Defence left blank for now. Just one small question in relation to the CPR31:14.... Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim: and it says * delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim. I'm not  sure if I ask for everything or nothing as I can't see any of the list mentioned in the POCs
    • Fund management firm Allan Gray also said giving Nationwide's members a vote on the £2.9 billion buyout would have been 'a much better path'.View the full article
    • A Swiss pressure group says some staff at Shein suppliers are still working excessive overtime.View the full article
    • Let me start by saying I feel tremendous regret, shame and remorse. I have some debt and personal life has fallen apart over the last year which has caused me to be careless. Doesn’t make it okay I know. In a positive way, i will never take anything in life for granted ever again. I want to volunteer and go back to being a good person. I need some advice/reassurance on the below so I can move on better from this experience. A few days ago I was caught at sainsburys, I paid for part of the food (about £5) and didn’t pay for the other (about £8-10) at self checkout. when I got to the exit someone in plain clothes asked to see my receipt and bag and that they worked for mitie. I told him the receipt was in the store bin (true) and he said he followed me round and knows I didn’t pay for all of it. he very sternly but calmly said he just needs my name then I can leave with the shopping. I said i am in a bad day and can’t do this and was on the verge of breaking down. So I handed him the shopping and slowly walked out. No name given (I read elsewhere this is good and makes it unlikely to develop) and I have no way knowing if police contacted. I overthink a lot and I wonder if they can track me via debit card or nectar card on the transaction. I also wonder if they saw me do it last month and have been waiting for me. I know someone who works at their head office and terrified somehow it will get back. I’m also terrified of being recognised in the street.    I don’t know what’s going to happen. I see a lot in the news today about shoplifting 
    • Hi, I’ve just spotted an Arrangement to Pay marker (TransUnion) on my Barclays Mortgage account for 1 month in March 2022. I’ve spoken to Barclays Customer Service and Complaints about this and they’ve given me some background but have closed my complaint: Direct Debit for mortgage bounced in February and I didn’t notice this at the time. Realised there were arrears in March and called customer service straight away. Offered to pay half the arrears on the call with the other half of the arrears the following month. I prob suggested or accepted this as had done that many years previously when I was a poor student with no adverse consequences. Paid in accordance with this. Barclays call notes report they informed me credit reference agencies would be notified and I indicated I understood. However, complaints team couldn’t access the call because it was too old. They advised I could request a transcript through GDPR and complain via ombudsman if still unhappy - I’ll process the GDPR request this week. Whilst it may be factual that I entered into some kind of arrangement regarding the arrears, it wasn’t clear to me that they would be treating it and reporting it as a formal payment plan along with the potential consequences of this. At no point did I agree to or request to “reducing my contractual payments” - I paid my contractual amount for March and April with 50% more on top. I guess it’s likely they did say something vague about credit reference agencies and it’s also possible that I may have agreed without fully understanding it would be different to a late payment marker. I’m not 100% sure of the impact of the AP but I believe it did tighten up balance transfer and new card offers (Lloyds group in particular) even though the rest of my report is spotless and I have many years managing multiple high balance cards. Although it may have been less comfortable, I also believe I had the means to pay the balance in full if I’d realised the impact at the time. Finally, it feels like Ive been penalised for speaking to customer services directly rather than just upping my payments to cover the arrears. Historically, I was under the impression that Barclays mortgages weren’t even reporting arrears of less than 2-3 months as late payments - although this may have changed since the last time I was in arrears. I’ve had a browse through threads about AP markers and it seems like removal is unlikely if it’s deemed factual but it may be worthwhile escalating to FOS or ICO? Will update with transcript details once I’ve raised and received a response to my request. I suppose the upside of this is that I’ll be even more cautious about negative markers in the future. Thanks, J
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HCEO clamped my car, i removed it, old Landlord got CCJ - help!


headache123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3616 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks.

 

i finally managed to get on the computer. been well stressed out today and been hiding away .

 

they were back again today banging down the door and not happy.

 

said they would be back!

 

how many more times will they come back?

 

finding hard to live in peace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

how can i ever drive my car again or park it on my driveway?

im feeling very scared in my house.

 

i refuse to pay them as i do not owe them any money.

 

the place where they clamped the car, where it has disappeared from.

 

can i continue to stay there?

 

feel so scard going in and out of the house.

 

thinking they will be back in th emorning.

cant go to work- feeling very distressed.

will they give up?

 

the debt the claimant was wrongly askign ofr has now tripled by the high court bailiffs.

 

they keep kncking at that door,

but i am not the tenant or hoem owner there.

 

what can teh person whois do to stp them returning?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Headache, you will be able to drive your car once this mess gets sorted out. I know it must be scary for you right now so the best thing you can do is go to bed and get some sleep.

Try and relax-easier said than done I know, but there are experts on this forum who will guide you through it all.

 

You have not let them in, your car is free and you have not paid them any money. Those are all plusses in your favour. Just continue not letting them in until you prove that the debt is

not yours and once that happens, all their stupid charges will be wiped off.

 

Maybe better going to work as they can't pester you there......................and you might be able to get a friend there to make you a cup of tea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give the information to Wonkeydonkey, , who will point you in the right direction. If and when they come back, film them with a mobile phone even through the letterbox, and offer them ID to show you are not the NAMED DEBTOR on the CCJ, the film would be evidence of any ultra vires (acting beyon their powers) act or threats. They cannot demand you stop filming it is your right to film them if they are on your premises.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

BACKGROUND - due to a situation goin back 3 years ago taht i was struggling with, i came on the forums for help. in short it was to do with a ll with whom i didnt have a tenancy and whereby i moved out very quickly. i paid him over the odds and left mutually happy. he later applied for a ccj against me and the first i knew was when a hceo tried to remove my car. long stor short - it went to court many times. in the end it went on the ll favour. it was an unfair trial. i wasnt given the chance to appeal either. regretably i represented mysellf. this situation caused me great illness and drained me out emotionally. it also ruined my impending marriage cus i was so under stress i couldnt handle it. (the ll was watching my house etc- made clear in court and admitted to by ll but judge didnt care). the ll won £2650. judgemenmt given a few months ago but credit history is still showing clear - (it was initially set aside).

 

Currently i have a clear credit history and am desperatly trying o buy my first house. but low and behold i recieve a letter in the post. i am financially not entitles to legal aid and have a good job. i am so stressed out and just dont know what to do. This is what i recieved.

original judgement form after case- it is order the defendnat pay to the claimant 2650 before 11 june.

The claimant has permission to file additional particulars of claim in respect of any amounts claimed as a result of enforcement taken against the defendant by 4th june.

so...i dint hear anything till yesterday :sad:

 

Got a pack in the post from the courts. theres a letter from the claimant dated 13 june. the ll has wrote the following:

i would liek to apologise to the judge who at the time of teh hearing verbally confirmed to me to file the additional particulares of claim by the 4th of june. however i was under the impression that a confirmation of the same would be sent in writing before i sumbit the additional particular of claim. i now enclose application notice with the original poc and supporting documention. (why would the ll be allowed to do this??? he was explained the 4th repeatedly and even waited behind after the case to be explained! repeatedly he has had unfair advantages and not done things on a timely scale:-x)

 

i have a court form saying i need to file a repsonse by 23 aug with hearing on sept 11. I am not even in the country then as i am away on business and can not face any more stress.

 

these are the fees that are being claimed for - how is it possible to claim for these????:-

fees incurred by the sheriffs office - £2314,84

vat on the said amount at 20% amounting to £462.97

solicitors fees of £500 (made up written reciept attached in paperwork)

additional cost paid to sherifs office £60.00 ( photocopy of chq given in paperwork however, ll was made to give me £60 due to not giving paperwork to me in previous court case in timely manner.

 

dont know what to do. so stressed out. cannot afford legal help. do not undertsnad how he is able to claim the sherrifs office costs??? isnt is the sheriffs office who claim for the claimant not the other way round? i

 

so tired and ill of this. been going on since 2010. please somebody help......

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, CALM DOWN.

 

Second, can you edit your post a little. Between your anger, frustration and rambling, it is hard to ascertain what is going on. That wasnt meant to mock you, just that your post is pretty tough to decipher.

 

You seem to be talking about 2 seperate cases. The first the LL won, and you got landed with the bill, then you go on about another case the LL has taken against you. Where did this come from? What is it about?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-(sorry. just so stressed out. yes the first the ll won and i got landed with the bill. At the end of the case, the ll was given permission to claim further particulars of claim for enforment. he was meant to do that by the 4th of june. he didnt do this till teh 14th. the particulars he is claiming for is

fees incurred by the sheriffs office - £2314,84

vat on the said amount at 20% amounting to £462.97

solicitors fees of £500 (made up written reciept attached in paperwork)

additional cost paid to sherifs office £60.00 ( photocopy of chq given in paperwork however, ll was made to give me £60 due to not giving paperwork to me in previous court case in timely manner.

so he is claiming for the sherrifs offices behalf??? so that 2314 includes their visits to me, their tow truck etc (one never came).

im trying to buy a house and cannot afford to have anything against me. i am alos not int he country at the time of the case which is in sept and i have been asked to file a response. just dont know what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He cant claim on behalf of the HCEO. It sounds like he is pulling a fast one and thinks the court will believe him.

 

hang tight and try and relax. I'll see if i can get someone more knowledgeable abotu the court system to come and help, although it might be tomorrow they look at the thread.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Headache.

 

Couple of points...I assume you never paid the judgment?

Where are you in the UK?

Does the paperwork allow you to to set a side the Order?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thread moved to Legal Issues.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou. believe me he has pulled many fast ones in the past, like not presenting me with evidence till on the date of the hearing - thats what he was made to pay me 60pounds for. all of a sudden he has sent a photocopy of a chq for £60 for the sherrifs office to me - it dont look real to me? and neither does the solcitiors fees and he only initially had a solicitor who wrote a letter to me at the very beginning going back last year. it was one letter. he had no solicitors ever after that.

wrt sheriffs office - he put a whole breakdwon like i said of their fees such as dvla wehile check etc - yes thats what i thought.

i initiall paid him 2 months money to leave the house - he went and claimed for 6 months saying i had a tenancy - its how it all started. he was clever then and now hes tring to get more money off me.

i dont even have the means to pay the initial order. worried it will start to show on my credit file.

thankyou id appreciate that very very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi no i didnt. i didnt think it was a fair trial. permission to appeal was refused. i wish i never represented myself. i went to a solicitors who were willing to go down the line of error in law (witnesses on ll side were allowed to sit in on whole hearing and speak on behalf of ll) - however, the fee ws £100 an hour at the very cheapest and i did not have the means.

i am in birmingham

within the pack i recieved there is a 'application notice form n244 notes for guidance' sheet attached. thats all i have, so i presume from the guidance notes i would have to fill a n244 form?could i have it set aside? i take it this would be at further financial cost to me? is there any way i ca stop this ll harassing me like this? also i am away from work on the hearing date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok the landlord was allowed to submit further particulars.....why? ...he has just won his case? Once judgment is passed thats the end of the matter...you cant add to it.You need to find out what the dJ allowed and for what reason.This was to be submitted by the 4th June he submitted his application on the 14th June.

 

Now he has made application and submitted his execution costs and still not been paid the initial judgment.How would he know what costs would be involved by the 14th June?

 

When have you recieved this pack and what else does it contain apart from the N244?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

at the end of the last hearing when it was given in his favour, he asked the judge repeatedly. as i said it was a very unfair trial. he had not added these costs to his original poc and wanted to add to the particulars of claim - the judge let him. as i said very very unfair.

 

apologies - he wrote the letter to the court on the 17th of june - he was supposed to "file additional poc in respect to any amounts claimed as a result of enforcement by the 4th of June". he had repeatedly not doen things on time.

 

the costs he is asking for are for the sherrifs office stuff he did before the hearing and costs before the hearing.

i recieved this on friday morning.

 

this is what the pack contains:-

general form of judgement of order asking i respond by the 23 august and it is listed for hearing to determine clamants entitlement to enforcement costs on 11 sept

letter from claimant dated 17 june requesting the judge to vary the order to include his new particulars of claim which teh judge has allowed him to do

a completed n244 application notice filled in by the claimant

n244 notes for guidance form

particulars of claim - fees incurred by the sherrifs office £2314.84, vat on the said amnt of 20% amounting to £462.97, solicitors fees of £500 , additional cost to sherriffs office of £60.00

a copy of the breakdown of the sheriffs office fees - to include things like mile fee, dvla check fee etc

a photocopy of a reciept for £500 from the solicitors (who only ever wrote one letter for him)

a photocopy of a chq which in the poc has stated its "additional cost paid to sherrifs office" but on the halifax photocopy chq it says pay hmcts £60.00

letters of feedback from the sherrifs office to the ll stating no reply at the door etc (this was before the last hearing)

copy of original judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...