Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nat West Customer - problems after their recent failures


mojo786
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi would like advise re natwest/rbs

 

have business and staff couldnt be paid wages and also as a company we couldnt source our goods from our normal supplier as we pay on cash basis and have had to pay over the odds by at least £600-£700 in total. our staff have also edured hardship as they have motgages d/d etc. what recourse do we have, can we claim charges bk plus interest as banks are allways willing to charge if we go over o/d etc,

 

could we chargw for the phone calls we made etc.

 

thank u in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS stated yesterday that they would do everything in their power to make sure none of their customers were out of pocket due to the recent problems.

If they are true to their word then you need to contact them and let them know by how much you are out of pocket and see what they say.

I'll ask the team to move your post to it's own thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think at the moment due to it still being an ongoing thing they are just concentrating on the fixing and providing extended hours for people to visit the banks, they have stated numerous times they will ensure nobody is out of pocket and I believe thats in the banking code or BCOBS now also.

 

For consequential losses I would imagine a claim via FOS or a court claim would be required.

 

Over the coming days there will be a lot more coming out including possibly the actual cause of the problem

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi freak

 

I think as The Shadow has said, let them catch up with themselves then no doubt they'll put a procedure in place for peoples claims to be looked at, but collect all evidence, phone bill etc. They will need to show a lot of goodwill.

 

Thanks Rebel.:-)

There seems to be a lack of information on the course of action to take for people who have lost money because of the problems with RBS and Co.

Do you know of any other links we could post on this thread for info?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently this morning sky news are reporting problems with people getting into the online banking at all...

 

http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16252281

 

Oh dear Natwest... you really are in a pickle.

 

Natwest's "help" page...

 

http://www.natwest.com/personal/customer-update.ashx

 

Message to Customers from Stephen Hester RBS Group Chief Executive

The problems of the past few days have caused disruption and inconvenience for our customers as well as for many customers of other banks.

 

I am very sorry for the difficulties people are experiencing. Our customers rely on us day in and day out to get things right, and on this occasion we have let them down. This should not have happened.

 

Right now my top priority, and the priority of the entire RBS Group, is to fix these problems and put things right for our customers.

 

This is taking time, but I want to reassure people that we are working around the clock to resolve these problems as quickly as we are able.

 

I also want to be clear that where our customers are facing hardship or difficulty we can and will help them. Our staff have already helped thousands of customers to access cash and we will continue to provide this service on a 24 hour basis while we work to resolve the problems.

 

I also want to reassure customers that no one will be left permanently out of pocket as a result of this, and again, they should contact us directly about this.

 

We have doubled the usual number of staff in our call centres, and for the first time ever we will open 1,200 branches across the country on a Sunday from 9am to 12pm.

 

Once again I am very sorry for the inconvenience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will be interesting to see where this goes - could actually be a very long term process.

And maybe complicated by the forthcoming sale of RBoS English branches to Santander

 

My account is with RBoS and didn't see any problems until Saturday

Link to post
Share on other sites

Branches will be opened for 3 hours on a Sunday!!!

3 Hours??? Why not all day?

This will have caused so many people problems.

 

My wife works for redrow and told me of 2 families waiting outside their new houses with removal trucks containing all they owned and not being able to move in as the monies could not be transferred.

I believe NW did eventually pay to put them up in hotels until the problem was sorted. But this must be a nightmare for families with kids. Redrow allowed the removal company to store the belongings in the houses but they were not allowed keys to the property as the funds had not transferred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe from what I have heard on the news that all money transfers relating to people purchasing new houses have now all gone through as a priority and there will be no more delays.

Cannot say this is a 100% correct but I do not think that NatWest would say this if it wasn't

Link to post
Share on other sites

As per my own thread, It seems that systems are going back on line - I can get in to online banking and it is showing all my transactions correctly. I have also made a payment via paypal this morning which has gone through with no hitches so fingers crossed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget they have to get a couple of tea's and lunch in, so 3 hours is about right.:madgrin:

 

Branches will be opened for 3 hours on a Sunday!!!

3 Hours??? Why not all day?

This will have caused so many people problems.

 

My wife works for redrow and told me of 2 families waiting outside their new houses with removal trucks containing all they owned and not being able to move in as the monies could not be transferred.

I believe NW did eventually pay to put them up in hotels until the problem was sorted. But this must be a nightmare for families with kids. Redrow allowed the removal company to store the belongings in the houses but they were not allowed keys to the property as the funds had not transferred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mojo. Sorry to see the problems you have incurred and hope you get them sorted promptly. Would be good if you could put a post on once you have spoken to them for their response to see how much they are really dedicated to make sure no one is out of pocket. I would suggest they need to resolve any compensation quickly to avoid any further critcism

Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on the news this morning that they are claiming that the issues were caused by "technical faults" and so their small print precludes compensation

 

A few days ago i heard on the news that the faults were due to a software upgrade. Whilst that is a bit "technical", failing to adequately test software before implementing it is negligent behaviour, not a "technical fault" that i would reserve for their main and backup computer sites both failing at the same time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Im a journalist from ITN we are looking for people who have been affected by the Natwest problems, could you give me a call on **EDIT **

 

Enas, would you please contact admin for permission to post your contact number on the forum..

 

[email protected] (no spaces)

 

 

Please do not post the number again until you have contacted admin..

 

Many thanks :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks -email now rec.

Enas please bear with us.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enas check your voicemail please.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone

 

quick update still hsving probs with rbs/natwest we still cant get our balance to see what our cash flow is, i have also heard on the grapevine that these probs could stretch to end of week. some of our staffs wages have gone trough from last week but not showing on account.

 

what price do u put on ones reputation as a business to customers staff and suppliers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it seems its still ongoing.They said that 99% of the problems have been fixed so 1% does not sound a lot-except when you are talking about 12 million affected.

Information is still trickling through and now it seems that there may be problems with peoples credit files as default entries begin to get flagged.There does seem to be wider implications for those third parties affected who are not customers of RBS.I think the BBA are behind the scenes organising a damage limitation plan that will very likely see co operation from BBA members.

Not the send off Angela Knight was expecting you can bet.

 

No doubt we will get a better picture of exactly what cause of action or restitution could be pursued.

Although RBS terms and conditions say they will not be held liable for technical issues,as we well know,terms and conditions are very much open to challenge.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...