Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Chronically low credit rating due to false derogatory remarks submitted to credit agency by NATWEST


Wizadoros

Recommended Posts

After 30 years of custom Natwest's draconian actions taken against me and sometimes unlawfully, for defaulting on my mortgage back in 2015 severely compromised my financial status, and my mental health.

They claimed that I failed to arrange a new mortgage product which wasnt true and after removing any online access to my accounts which were not in the red, they closed my current and business account and stopped my charge card. In fact when I called the customer helpline the day after I realised this had been done, there was no record of my existence. 

Despite the account being in dispute and a SAR requested in January 2016 but not receiving any documents until Jan 2017 NATWEST filed for repossession and was granted permission to do so. However, I turned my circumstances around and with financial help from family I had in fact overpaid by the end of that financial year by £7400.

No further defaults occurred and a new mortgage deal was offered that would be for the amount outstanding on the mortgage plus the arrears. It wasnt made clear that there were 7 months of late payment fees of £35,  litigation fees for £1036, arrangement failure charged at £995 for which I am awaiting an explanation for as no such failure occurred. There is also the sum of all the money that was in both my current and business account missing from the annual statements which they claimed to have put towards the mortgage when they closed my accounts. 

I had suffered from severe mental health issues thereafter hence why these issues are being raised now but they were highlighted when I tried to make sense of a persistently very low credit rating ever since the first default in 2015.

To my amazement Transunion reported that derogatory remarks have been and may well continue to be  submitted by NATWEST regarding defaults on my mortgage. These dont relate to 2015 but to a period starting July 2017 thru to January 2019. Annual mortgage statements from Natwest as well as my current account statements show payments were made in that period. 

I reported the matter to NATWEST 2 weeks ago and after 4 phone calls I received an acknowledgment of my filed complaint only yesterday. I have spoken to people from Financial support, the credit assessment team have been notified and now its in the hands of the complaints department. I am told this is a very peculiar case and every effort is being made to find the 'missing' money.

I have read your guidance on credit ratings in relation to banks reporting but other than filing a written complaint to NATWEST as my phone calls seem to be ignored and another to Transunion, is there anything else I should be thinking of and what kind of redress should i be asking for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

off to the FOS immediately 8 weeks expires regardless to if they have replied or not, if i's not sorted.

might be an idea to do a new sar.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...