Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • [URL=https://meettomy.site]Pretty Girls in your town[/URL]
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2504 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Speaking from my own experience working briefly in a charity shop, I was given the H&S rules guidance by the shop manageress, then when the WP guy came to visit, he too had a H&S form which we went through and verified that I'd been given all the gen by the shop, so it seems both the Employer and the WP have responsibility. I'd imagine the WP would have to check up on the H&S of any placement before sending people there..or they should be anyway.

 

As to the benefits advisor's role, I haven't a clue - I'm sure Flumps will clarify that part for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

FLUMPS

 

Who has the ultimate responsibility if a work placement has been made which was totally unacceptable. The benefit advisor, the work placement agent, or the shop being assigned to work for

 

I am talking of a benefit advisor not informing the work place adviser that the claimant was registered disabled and on crutches, and that the work place provider just sends a letter telling the claimant to report to xyz with no prior contact

 

I am going down the lines of risk assessments, management of health and safety at work regs etc

 

See post 5 by me here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?342677-Disability-discrimination-from-public-bodies

 

H&S act 74, Disability Discrimination Act 85 (?) & Equality Act 2010. There's a post by me probably in a Nysty thread although probably repeated that explains how you do this. The site that can not be named is also advocating this approach for WFI and Work Program issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FLUMPS

 

Who has the ultimate responsibility if a work placement has been made which was totally unacceptable. The benefit advisor, the work placement agent, or the shop being assigned to work for

 

I am talking of a benefit advisor not informing the work place adviser that the claimant was registered disabled and on crutches, and that the work place provider just sends a letter telling the claimant to report to xyz with no prior contact

 

I am going down the lines of risk assessments, management of health and safety at work regs etc

There is also the issue of tax fraud and tax avoidance to address.... according to DWP Provider Guidance,

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pg-part-p.pdf

3.13 It is not necessary (although it’s desirable wherever possible) for the placement to be in the same sector or type of work as the customer’s job goal, as MWA is designed to help the customer develop disciplines associated with employment. Customers cannot choose their placements.

 

3.15 Placements must be additional to any existing or expected vacancies. You must ensure that employers are not taking advantage of MWA as a source of labour at the expense of employing workers in the open labour market.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Was just wondering if Ingeus can make me go into their offices and do 2hour plus jobsearch, even if i have internet access at home, i have told them many times i jobsearch at home, and it is a waste of my time and busfare (i know we get travel back but i have to save it out of my bit money to get there in the first place) to keep going weekly to sit in the overheated hot office and look for hours at the only handful of jobs that are out there....was just wondering if any of you guys/gals know if it is deffo mandortary. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Was just wondering if Ingeus can make me go into their offices and do 2hour plus jobsearch, even if i have internet access at home, i have told them many times i jobsearch at home, and it is a waste of my time and busfare (i know we get travel back but i have to save it out of my bit money to get there in the first place) to keep going weekly to sit in the overheated hot office and look for hours at the only handful of jobs that are out there....was just wondering if any of you guys/gals know if it is deffo mandortary. Thank you.

 

Attending their offices to do a jobsearch isn't Mandatory in that everyone on WP has to do it, though your advisor may have made it Mandatory for you. Of course, they have certain rules to follow to make an appointment Mandatory. See chapter 3 Here

 

I've been on WP for nearly 12 months now and have never done a job search at their offices. I told them when I was first put on the program I needed to do any jobsearch from home because all the info I need to fill in application forms was on my PC and I also worked from previous cover letters when writing a new one. They were fine with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Stikky62

Thanks for the quick reply, i have been with Ingeus for almost 2yrs and have mentioned many times i can jobsearch at home yet they still make me go into town (Newcastle) or Gateshead office, but never know if it's Mandortary, i will now check out the info you gave me and have another chat with my 6th advisor haha, thanks again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..plus according to the DWP WP guidelines, everything Ingeus ask you to do must be 'reasonable in your circumstances'. I'd argue it was definitely unreasonable to get you to trail in and do something you could do perfectly well at home. Plus, by having you there, they're possibly denying a place to someone who doesn't have a pc or internet at home and who needs it more than you do. Worth mentioning that to them - even offer to email them details of jobs you apply for as proof (minus the employers addresses naturally, which is what Ingeus really want so they can claim they found you the job and be paid for it).

 

You'd think they'd be trying to save the expenses money as much as possible, not wasting it when there was no need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well went in to Ingeus today with all intentions of asking my Advisor about the job searching at home, never got the chance was put straight on PCs by the receptionist, then after i was there for half a hour my advisor came over and told me he wanted a word, asked me if i have had any luck, i answered then he took my bus ticket photo copied it and told me to go?, was there less than 40mins... took longer to travel there and back....waste of time and energy...plus there were around 15 people waiting to use PCs yet they were all booked out. As i was leaving i said see you next week, advisor replied "if i'm still here" i asked what he meant he looked at me and just shook his head said "you never know what might happen" So wondering if he is sick of job and leaving or some of them are getting the push as they now know it's not working.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[...]was put straight on PCs by the receptionist

 

Errmm.. A lowly receptionist has neither the authority or the powers to mandate anyone to do a job search or anything else. If it happens again, decline the "invite" and insist on seeing the "adviser" as per appointment.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what probably happened was that the receptionist just ticked Lorise's name off the attendance list, saw she was down for jobsearch and said 'Okay, grab a free computer'. Happened to me a few times - the advisors expect you to just turn up and get on with it and though it would have been polite to be greeted by my advisor, my view is the less contact I have with them the better!

 

Advisors have far better things to do than greet us anyway..there's the lunchtime sandwiches to order, holiday discussion, arranging a staff night out, writing new presentations littered with spelling errors, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I and a few others will be finishing our two years with Ingeus early July. My thoughts turn to what will happen then. With Charities and retailers pulling out of the workfare programme and the governement not planning on failure it makes me wonder how this will all pan out for us. Would FLUMPS be able to find out if the New Enterprise Scheme be available to returnees to the JCP. As it stands we cannot access this scheme on the WP and my advisors have been less than encouraging with help to achieve my ambitions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I and a few others will be finishing our two years with Ingeus early July. My thoughts turn to what will happen then. With Charities and retailers pulling out of the workfare programme and the governement not planning on failure it makes me wonder how this will all pan out for us. Would FLUMPS be able to find out if the New Enterprise Scheme be available to returnees to the JCP. As it stands we cannot access this scheme on the WP and my advisors have been less than encouraging with help to achieve my ambitions.

The new regulations coming into place at the end of April (part of Welfare Reform) decree that candidates must spend 35 hours per week on job search or "preparing to enter the jobs market".... and I suspect that, depending on the subjective opinion of a Job Centre Plus Clerk, that candidates may be encouraged to seek "Voluntary Work" (an oxymoron if a Job Seekers Direction is issued) or subject to "Mandatory Work Activity". When finishing the Work Programme, candidates may need to sign a "Universal Credit Claimant Commitment" when returning to the Job Centre.

 

On an aside issue, the new regulations governing training in FE Colleges mean that, if a FE course at Level 3/4 is no longer financed by the Local Authority (for example), then a candidate may negotiate a Student Loan (as with undergraduates) which need not be repaid until you finish the course and earn £21K per annum.

 

The New Enterprise Allowance Scheme is still restricted - but, if you have a business idea, best to seek Professional Advice locally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new regulations coming into place at the end of April (part of Welfare Reform) decree that candidates must spend 35 hours per week on job search or "preparing to enter the jobs market".... and I suspect that, depending on the subjective opinion of a Job Centre Plus Clerk, that candidates may be encouraged to seek "Voluntary Work" (an oxymoron if a Job Seekers Direction is issued) or subject to "Mandatory Work Activity". When finishing the Work Programme, candidates may need to sign a "Universal Credit Claimant Commitment" when returning to the Job Centre.

 

On an aside issue, the new regulations governing training in FE Colleges mean that, if a FE course at Level 3/4 is no longer financed by the Local Authority (for example), then a candidate may negotiate a Student Loan (as with undergraduates) which need not be repaid until you finish the course and earn £21K per annum.

 

The New Enterprise Allowance Scheme is still restricted - but, if you have a business idea, best to seek Professional Advice locally.

 

Hi Rebecca and thanks for the heads up, it will be an interesting few months.. I am currently on mandatory course catch up. I have 'Interview Skills' on Friday (last week was BTEC Level 1 Work Skills-I did this voluntary as it funds my Sage50 course), so will be going over the same ground with Friday course as I covered Interview Skills last week with 96% grade. I have another in a few weeks time. Must admit I have been left alone on Ingeus, been in to do jobsearch and spec letter under my own steam, I may as well use their internet and postage!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've lost me G4C? who works for Evanta?

 

A friend I used to work with, I spoke to him last week and he said he got a new job helping people get work , he said it was evanta (or something like that) I said 'no not 1 of them places'

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.avanta.uk.com/jobseekers

 

Avanta are Work Programme, not in my part of the world though.

 

I just looked at their site, all the usual carp.

 

How we work with you

Once you’ve been referred to us by Jobcentre Plus, we focus on understanding the kind of job that will match your circumstances. We focus on the skills, qualifications and work experience that you already have and agree the type of support that’s right for you.

Then, we work closely with you to agree a plan of action to help to make it all happen - we’re with you every step of the way.

 

loosely translated that means, we will ignore any skills or experience you have and push you into a call centre or retail job.

 

We work with you and with local and national employers so that we know exactly what vacancies are available – even if they haven’t been advertised yet.

 

The usual 'secret jobs' rubbish.

 

We also make sure that we understand their company culture, the type of people they’re looking for and the skills they that expect them to have or develop on the job.

 

So they have watched supermarket sweep at some point and have an in-depth knowledge of the retail industry.

 

Another set of clowns.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...