Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi BankFodder, Thanks for the reply.  I will take your advice and read through more thoroughly. To answer your question, the value of the laptop is £255.  When filling in the online form to prepare the shipment it asked what the contents of the parcel was and the value and I specified "laptop" and "£255". Thanks.
    • Before you start this claim you need to have a lot more confidence in what you're doing which means that you need to understand the way forward in the principles involved more thoroughly. We will help you and you will probably get your money back but this is a self empowerment forum and so you have to do your bit as well. Please will you spend at least the next couple of days reading through the stories on this sub- forum. Try to understand them thoroughly. We have lots of stories very similar to yours but even those which are not similar, have principles in them which apply. In particular you need to read and understand the information in the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum. I know that you have been reading around here for the past couple of hours but it needs a lot more. You aren't in a huge hurry. Wait a few days before sending a letter of claim and also that needs some amendment as well. Come back here when you've done your reading and then we will have a look at your letter of claim and help you to refine it Also, please tell us the value of the laptop. Was it properly declared as a laptop – and was the value properly declared
    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Channel 4 Dispatches to air debt collection exposé


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope they are going to mention Marlins side kick solictor as they are as bad.

 

The SRA will have to do something then!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm looking forward to watching this show, have the auto channel change on the tv set already... good luck to suziwong1012 and didydicky for appearing. With luck these idiots will be shown to be stupid brainless thugs and the whole industry rather than individual parts of it will be investigated.

 

A lot of knee jerk legislation is needed now, ie NO DCA can put a marker on your credit file, NO OC can part with a debt unless they haven't been in contact with the creditor for 3 years, ONCE a debt is sold the default date cannot be changed, I could go on for about 15 more items I'd like to see legislated against.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they are going to mention Marlins side kick solictor as they are as bad.

 

Well i showed them the solicitors letter i got from mortimer clarke and they were very interested that they sent me this when legally they couldn't get the money

Link to post
Share on other sites

What concerns me about this programme tonight is that they will portray the DCA industry as something really scary & frightening etc..

I guess to some people it can be - but to Caggers like us, we know it to be anything but that.

Simply an industry that is so far up its own backside, thinks it has powers over the individual that it hasnt & full of loutish pillocks employed as threat monkeys.

The fact that they made suziwong1012 in floods of tears the star of the show so to speak annoys me as well (no disrespect lol)

Why couldnt they have had someone off here instead who knows how to handle them & knows how the industry really works inside out.

I guess somebody frightened & in tears makes a better programme :(

Edited by mr.ton
Link to post
Share on other sites

What concerns me about this programme tonight is that they will portray the DCA industry as something really scary & frightening etc..

I guess to some people it can be - but to Caggers like us, we know it to be anything but that.

Simply an industry that is so far up its own backside, thinks it has powers over the individual that it hasnt & full of loutish pillocks employed as threat monkeys.

The fact that they made susiwong1012 in floods of tears the star of the show so to speak annoys me as well (no disrespect lol)

Why couldnt they have had someone off here instead who knows how to handle them & knows how the industry really works inside out.

I guess somebody frightened & in tears makes a better programme :(

 

Quite simply cos it makes better tv (in their opinion I hasten to add) to show someone being intimidated by these thugs and bullied.. plus its likely to get a better response.

 

Showing a threat monkey getting the run around from someone who knows there rights isnt going to make anybody clamp down on them.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite simply cos it makes better tv (in their opinion I hasten to add) to show someone being intimidated by these thugs and bullied.. plus its likely to get a better response.

 

Showing a threat monkey getting the run around from someone who knows there rights isnt going to make anybody clamp down on them.

 

S.

 

Agreed, before I found this site I was cowering behind the sofa:oops:. Unfortunately the DCAs do have this effect on people:mad:

 

Although, have to say seeing a prog showing DCAs given the run around would now make great viewing

Edited by joemay
Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest con trick they ever played on people was to make everyone frightened of them & to be cowering behind sofa's etc...all so people would just buckle and pay up.

Thanks to CAG - the DCA industry is in a state of panic as people now realize that they are about as threatening & scary as new born kitten.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The follow up should be an exposé showing how an ordinary person, on receipt of the start of a Threat-o-gram/Threat-o-matic DCA campaign, turns the tables using info from CAG, then nails their dangly bits to a witness box.

 

T'would be a nice touch if they took it all the way to the Court, obtained a CCJ against said DCA or showed how scary as a kitten they really are, by showing their hastily scribbled offer of settlement.

 

**waves at guests** :-)

 

Scary here, (if you're a DCA) isnt it? ;-)

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I have tried several times to post this as a music score but, without success.

So here are the notes of the tune dedicated to the DCA's:

 

Bb Bb Bb Bb Db C C Bb Bb Bb Bb

 

Now into your parlour, open the piano and play the notes. Let me know what you think it is lol.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...