Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stopped by Police after visiting Tesco


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5314 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Couple of posts temp unapproved.

By my calcs they have until next Friday to respond.

If they dont I wont be pussyfooting-next step will be a 14 day letter before action.

This weekend another 2 people pulled me up in town asking whats gone on-you cannot get stopped right outside the towns Weatherspoons pub and expect no one to notice.I have been a DJ in my town centre for almost 20 years in most of the pubs and bars and so not exactly unknown.

I dont need any Solicitors or CAB for this-I will follow it through myself and let a Court decide if its ok for the likes of like Tesco to target people at will, when and as they think they feel like doing so,without just cause or valid reasons.

I am not just doing this for me-I want to send a message that may hopefully prevent the same from happening to others.

 

Well said - not that i look dodgy, but i have been followed round stores and stopped on more than one occasion, just waitng for it to happen again, now that i am up to speed on the ins and outs, thanks to this site.

The retailers worst nightmare !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I called into Tesco today for some bits and pieces.

On my way out I noticed there was no one queuing at the CS desk -which is VERY unusual.

I made my way over and said I was advising them I had made a request to their data protection office and maybe she would like to log it.

She asked me to explain...which is what I then did.

She agreed that it was out of order and picked up the tannoy desk Mic ..."I am going to call the Manager" she said -can you wait a moment ?

I said sure lets see how he can explain things.

After 2 further calls no response.

A cashier came over and said "Ah they are still in the meeting upstairs"....I said fair enough.

She then said-Do you want me to call Security ? maybe they can add something ?

As I glanced over I said "No thanks-theres the guy who was on duty here when I called in on the 26th-I dont want to speak to him at all thanks"

With that I made my exit.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems cause I had a bobcap on and a tracksuit

 

But Tesco sells bobcaps and tracksuits, so what are they on about. Do they call the police every time someone purchases a cap and tracksuit, how stupid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said - not that i look dodgy, but i have been followed round stores and stopped on more than one occasion, just waitng for it to happen again, now that i am up to speed on the ins and outs, thanks to this site.

 

The fact that I was walking very slowly and casually,gives rise to the fact that the store security could EASILY have stopped me before leaving the store-in fact there was a 500 metre walk across their car park heading into town.

My belief is that this was carried out as part of the towns shopwatch operations whereby stores inform everyone else in the location even if you are seen to be just LOOKING suspicious.

Radios are left on an open channel and the Police obviously pick up these messages as they are sent-but in this instance I was specifically told that they had been given a report from Tesco-he even knew thats where I had come from.

I might also contact the Co-ordinators of the towns shopwatch and ask to see a copy of their privacy and policy docs-I dont think I would need to send a SAR for that.

It may well be there will be some supporting evidence I can use in there.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But Tesco sells bobcaps and tracksuits, so what are they on about. Do they call the police every time someone purchases a cap and tracksuit, how stupid.

 

 

Very true Conniff-I very often go shopping in trackies-as do many people.

Its a stereotype image that store detectives the Police and Security firms appear to use almost as an industry standard observation tac.

Years ago it used to be earrings and tattoos....these days no one bats an eyelid.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update on this.

Following no reply to my first letter I sent a second.

Got a reply back dated 3rd July from their legal team.

 

Basically they are saying that following their investigation with the store-they can confirm that they hold no info about me and no request was made by them to Police to stop me.

Someone is telling porkies here.....

 

Have replied that I will do a SAR to Merseyside Police and find out who is telling the truth.

Also asked again why I have not been given a response to my questions about their procedures for releasing CCTV images under the data protection act.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go get em Martin, they are becoming a law unto themselves!!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the police do have stop and search rights under the p.a.c.e act

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes of course they do.

But I was told that the reason for them pulling me was following a report that I had been seen acting very suspicious in Tesco.

I am wondering if the store security made the call by radio and did not log it.

Hopefully the SAR to the Police should throw some light as to whether that was the case.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just showed my son this thread. He works for Tesco on security and he is gobsmacked at this. He dosnt think the call came from Tesco as they are trained to watch someone from the moment they get suspicious and have to have cctv footage from then to the person leaving the store or else they cant do anything.

For instance, of they see someone pocket a CD they have to be able to see them on camera for ALL the rest of the time they are in store, otherwise they cannot stop them as they leave the store as they could possibly have put the item back in a different place.

He said he cannot see any possible instance which would result in security contacting the police after someone has left the store.

There is nothing in the training that allows this to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply I appreciate it.

What you say is very logical.

But my town operates a shopwatch scheme which is linked to almost all business in the town.

grants were given to allow the scheme to be expanded to even the smallest of business since there is a fee for radios.

On leaving Tesco I had to walk some 700 metres across a car park-cross a road and turn into another main street.

It was when I turned in there that I saw the police car approaching me from the opposite direction.

If it was Police motivated then they had good possibility to stop me well before this point.

in fact it is not possible for the Police to have driven from the store to where I was stopped because it would have meant them driving all round town on the one way system.

Possible then that Tesco are operating the shopwatch as separate to the security team and was not logged ?

It is a complete mystery to me.

How did the Police know that I was i the store ?

Yes I was wandering around aimlessly looking for what I went in there for.

They interpreted this wrongly but could only suggest this if they were told.

Incidentally I had £960 in my pocket which I was using to buy some dollars for my holiday-and bought 30 minutes after this.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even under PACE they need a reason & in this case the reason was supplied by Tesco

 

 

My son gets stopped and searched about 3 times a week on average (He's 17 and we live in a city). The reason they give each time is 'suspicion' of what exactly we have never been able to determine. The amendments to PACE make Thatchers 'SUS' laws look like the cub scout handbook.:evil:

 

(He's been arrested and the house has been subsequently searched three times this year. Each time they use PACE 32 powers to search because the 'Police Code' version conveniently leaves out everything after the comma ie if the person is a danger to himself or others. Two NFA's and a 'laughed out of Court' quite literally).

Two of the arrests were because my son refused to give his name upon stop and search which is of course an arrestable offence. His reason being that the officers were not prepared to issue him with the yellow 'naughty note' form.

What is the country coming to?

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I may have argued on this case and refused also but for leaving for Russia a few hours later.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they wonder why people dont have respect for the police :mad:

 

My cousin was arrested because he refused to state that his nationality was British (he's Northern Irish) and charged with public order offences (breach of the peace I think) he was just lifted off the street, on a Saturday afternoon, for no reason at all.

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry this happened to you, Martin. It's absolutely ridiculous. I'm glad you're fighting it though. Say the word and we can have a boycott of Tesco!:D

My daughter phoned me yesterday to say her friend was arrested under S. 44 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, handcuffed and searched, then held for some time in a locked police van on Chatham High Street for taking photographs.

He's an amateur photographer and a member of Medway Eyes. All the members are so incensed they've organised a mass photo taking protest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing Patma:eek:

I have ways of getting even with Tesco-I will be reporting them to trading standards for every breach of unfair consumer trading regs....They quite often make mistakes in my local store-I will be looking out for them in future.;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two of the arrests were because my son refused to give his name upon stop and search which is of course an arrestable offence.
I was under the impression that giving your name is not required during a stop & search / account under Secion 60 / PACE / Section 44, and not giving your name is not grounds for arrest.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that giving your name is not required during a stop & search / account under Secion 60 / PACE / Section 44, and not giving your name is not grounds for arrest.

 

 

Correct, not giving your name and address to a Police Officer for the purpose of reporting your for summons autmatically gives the Police a right to arrest you under SOPCA.

 

Under SOPCA, this triggers a power of offence for *ANY* offence what so ever.

 

Stop Search is a power that can be abused.

 

An officer can conduct a Section 1 PACE search based on 'current intelligence' and they don't have to specify the source of this intel when making the search.

 

I'm certain they have a get out in the dataprotection act to not supply this info. Otherwise, every drug barron in the UK would be doing subect data requests (crude analogy as this has nothing to do with your situation)

 

I do think the whole situation stinks so far as your case is concerned. Have you considered making an official complaint to the Police?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that giving your name is not required during a stop & search / account under Secion 60 / PACE / Section 44, and not giving your name is not grounds for arrest.

 

You are correct. Unfortunately the policy recently adopted by our local constabulary is to stop them 'on suspicion of........' then adjust to suit the circumstances. The arrests were made under Sec 50 of the Police reform Act 2002. Both times the initial stop seems to be the ubiquitous 'suspicion of drug misuse' that they stop eveyone between the ages of about 15 to 30 of around us, then if they feel the boys are being 'uncooperative' this changes to suspicion of anti social behaviour. Any objection whatsoever to the initial stop and search can be construed as 'anti social behaviour'.

 

My daughter was recently on a double decker bus returning from college. The bus was pulled over and everyone had to get off have their tickets checked, and walk through a metal detector, have their pockets, handbags, schoolbags and shopping bags searched. This included all the old ladies coming back from shopping, bingo or wherever. Took over one hour and no explanation was given.

Perhaps next time Martin3030 fancies a day trip to Russia he comes to the West Midlands you get the full cold war experience down here.

 

(The case that was laughed out of Court involved a witness description of the offender describing him as black (my son is white) and the primary witness accidentally saying 'It wasn't them it was two other people' prior to cross exmination).

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter was recently on a double decker bus returning from college. The bus was pulled over and everyone had to get off have their tickets checked, and walk through a metal detector, have their pockets, handbags, schoolbags and shopping bags searched. This included all the old ladies coming back from shopping, bingo or wherever. Took over one hour and no explanation was given.

That's appalling and the fact that if you raise questions , then you are accused of anti-social behaviour, well what can I say.

We have to stand up against these Orwellian tactics, because if we don't it can only get worse. People need to wake up fast to what's going on in this country.

It's good that your children have got a Dad who knows his rights and is no pushover, TLD. I hope it rubs off on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing Patma:eek:

I have ways of getting even with Tesco-I will be reporting them to trading standards for every breach of unfair consumer trading regs....They quite often make mistakes in my local store-I will be looking out for them in future.;)

That's a great idea. I'll do that in solidarity.:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some security guards have nothing better to do with their time. I always get watched in shops, as I'm covered in tattoos and a skinhead, and a big build. Without fail, when I walk into a shop, I always say out loud to my girlfriend,"Watch the security guard follow me now to see if I'm gonna steal something! By the time he's followed me aroudn the store to thje till, where I will PAY for everything. he'd be better looking for the smack heads and drunks and scallies who are stealing right under his nose"

 

This normally makes the guard shuffle about a bit, then disappear around the corner. What's even funnier is, ten seconds later, I normally see his head pop around the corner, then I say, very loudly,"Look! He's following me again!"

 

At this stage, people around me are laughing and even talking to me about it. It happens everytime I go into Tesco or Asda. My girlfriend hates going shopping with me, cos I do this every time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes theres a distinct absence of any observation of others who are more conservatively dressed.

I never see Bank Managers getting stopped or questioned even though they are clearly very guilty of taking money from people that does not belong to them-and they've been getting away with it for years.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...