Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wilko v just about everybody


wilko1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3385 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ask them to prove that they dont owe you 20k cos you sure you remember lending it to them ... No .. you dont have any paperwork properly signed when you lent it to them but in the fairyland they live in what does that matter ???

Edited by lafey
Link to post
Share on other sites

If a creditor sends you a threat o gram saying pay the full amount owing in 7 days or blah blah. Does this mean the account is terminated without a default notice having been served? And what are the implications?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it doesn't. A threatogram is just that - full of meaningless threats to scare you into payment. They are full of "might" and "could" but only a court can decide what WILL happen if you don't pay and a DCA cannot guess what that might be. DCAs have no legal powers whatsoever and their threatograms are no more than wishful thinking on their part. Ignore them - you are sure to get some more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
Details of the lenders credit scoring process and the info they found about the borrowers financial situation?

 

thanks

 

No, I don't think so re the credit scoring but it may show some screenshots of your financial situation as in your income, employer contact details and telephone numbers.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

i think you would have to apply for it via a legal aid sol and they would asses the case on its merits .i.e chance of success PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had numerous DCA's chasing me for various debts over the past 2 years for cc debts, I was just trying to find out how I stood if any of them eventually issued court papers.

 

In that case, I would advise you to start a thread in the Debt forums and outline the current position with each DCA... incl. the name of each company chasing you, the alleged balance outstanding on each account, how old the accounts are and what type of credit it was (CC/loan, etc).... and if you have any CCJs that you know of.

 

The reason being.... you need to establish if these companies are legally entitled to collect anything from you at all.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are all cc debts taken out pre 2003, I've CCA'd them all and have had nothing enforceable sent back, I've challenged them all to take me to court, most seem to have backed off, only occassionally does someone send a threatogram or phone up now. If I do get issued with court papers I'll start individual threads for each one. Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Does anyone know if this firm is one of these solicitors that rent out their name to DCA's, so that the DCA can pretend that you are receiving a letter from a genuine firm of solicitors, when in fact it is just the DCA sending another threatogram.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I've had Lloyds saying that they are only required to keep agreements for 6 yrs from when the account is opened.

I've read on here that it is 6 yrs from closure of the account, but can anyone provide a link or something that proves it is legally 6 yrs after closure.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the info re 6 years after closure, but that is the only timeframe that makes any sense. If it is a requirement of creditors to provide a copy of the CCA following a statutory request, then it cannot just be 6 years from when the account was opened.

 

If Lloyds were confident in their response they would have stated the legislation or rules that applied.

 

I have been involved in record keeping in financial services and it is not that straightforward. Most of the rules come under accounting standards and regulatory review processes. The keeping of records is often focused on standards which are not specifically aimed at consumers, but on the prudential standards of the business. But having said that, if the CCA 1974 states that a request for a copy of the CCA can be made up to 6 years after closure of the account, then they would have to comply with it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the account is closed

they'll not supply it under a CCA request anyhow.

 

sar would be the way

adding a line to include any/all agreements with them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the Money laundering and tax laws, statutory documents are supposed to be kept for 5/7 years after the financial relationship has ended.

 

Information Commissioner sits on the fence and says that they need only keep data for as long as is necessary.

 

Now one would assume with all the issues surrounding the non production of original agreements, that companies would indeed keep them until the relationship had ended.

 

If your account is closed or has been sold/assigned, then they might have a good argument. But if it hasn't then I think their response is disingenuous and they might just be trying to cover their backs.

 

Put the ball back in their court and ask them for the legislation that advises they only need keep the documents for 6 years from opening.. !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the account is closed

they'll not supply it under a CCA request anyhow.

 

sar would be the way

adding a line to include any/all agreements with them

 

dx

 

They should under guidelines and the cca provide a copy (under 77-79)for as long as there remains sums due under the agreement, or until judgment.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they are sayin the account is closed

 

then i'd assume nowts owing.

 

so if the agreement is completed, the cca request is not applicable?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many people say closed when they mean terminated, so I thought I would clarify the situation.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

await the sar me thinks

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Help / opinions would be appreciated.

 

In the following example, when would the debt become statute barred?

 

Last payment made January, default notice issued July, defaulted with cra's December.

 

Statute barred January + 6 years, July + 6 years or December + 6 years.

 

No payments or acknowledgement of debt made.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...