Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking eye charge notice - reply or ignore it?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4598 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello there. The guys here know what they're doing, you can trust them.

 

Just to add a little to what's been said, you will get a series of letters that are dressed up to look ever more scary and threatening, called threatograms here. If you get spooked by them, and people do, come back here for a pep talk. There's a link somewhere here to another thread that shows the letter trail in advance, although I'm not sure they're Parking Eye ones.

 

My best, HB

 

Thank you for being there. Was getting terribly worried though I knew I had paid for sufficient time on the ticket in Walsall in August and had written twice to affirm this. I was beginning to weaken at the increasing menace of the letters as I had not retained the parking ticket or shop receipts and the threats had begun whilst I was away from home so were already up to £110. I was just checking their website calling up Parking Eye when I got this thread. I had already had conflicting advice from the RAC and the duty policeman I had contacted to ask re this firm. The latter said they were bullies and I should just ignore them; the former thought I would need documentary evidence. This thread has convinced me I should just collect the said standard escalating letters until they cease and then send them to the paper waste.

Now feel confident this is the right step so thanks guys- I:high5::high5::high5::lalala: love you.WW

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have found, the average policeman has scanty knowledge of contract law.

 

To be fair to this policeman, it was he who said they were bullies if I read WorriedWell's post right

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the duty policeman gave me the best advice and said the firm sounded dodgy; it was the RAC legal adviser who said I would require documentary proof. My punctuation is always a bit lax when emailing-sorry!

One thing does everybody else save their windscreen tickets and coffee bills?

I began to think I had been imprudent.

WW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just had a phone call from the wife saying she has had a letter through from these clowns when she parked at our local Aldi. Something didnt ring true when she read it to me so being a hmm hmm modern man i googled it :) and hey presto i found many similar people who are having the same problem. I think i will keep checking back here and will keep you updated with developements im going to completely ignore them and cant wait to have a good chuckle at the letters !!!

 

Thanks to everyone on here who has offered up there advice its been a great help, and as a footnote i think i know why Aldi are associated with this company ......THE READIES !!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks very much. There getting nothing from me .....Your name vill alzo go on de list :) I think more people need to be made aware of this and I think Aldi should be held accountable for contracting them in.

 

I think they just see it as a cash-cow so that they can intimidate and con people out of hard earned money !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey people, I'm totally new to this, so, please bear with...

I recently received a notice from Parking Eye. I had parked in riverside retail carpark in Chelmsford Essex, for 4 days consecutively. Starting to think I had been lucky not being issued a ticket (I had seen the 2 hour max stay sign so but was told by a work colleague that the office I was working on had allocated spaces there, this wasn't true, allocated spaces were in a small nearby carpark) Bang, a week later and i get one of these threatening letters stating I should pay £80+£30 admin, though it would be reduced to a very modest £50 (note sarcasm) if I paid within 14 days or something. Bearing in mind I parked there for 4 days, I got 4 of these on the trot, do the math and you'll see I'm a little lighter.

Now, as my fine(s) are quite severe, will they decide to make an example of me and send collectors etc?? Or should I ignore these and smile at every letter they scare me with?? Any replies will be much appreciated,

Luke

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them. As for "sending collectors". Don't confuse debt collectors with proper court bailiffs. Debt collectors are just private citizens with no special powers. they cannot enter your property, they cannot seize goods and they cannot blacken you credit record over an alleged parking ticket. Finally they are not FINES, just invoices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them. As for "sending collectors". Don't confuse debt collectors with proper court bailiffs. Debt collectors are just private citizens with no special powers. they cannot enter your property, they cannot seize goods and they cannot blacken you credit record over an alleged parking ticket. Finally they are not FINES, just invoices.

Ok, I was just a little worried as I did park there 4 days in a row and thought they may make an example of me. Having said that, I saw someone on here had received 35 of these invoices, kinda puts me to shame. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw someone on here had received 35 of these invoices, kinda puts me to shame.

The more the better in my view.

 

It increases their expectation and therefore disappoints them all the more when they realise you realise!!

 

But let them work through their system. It's only costing them, not you !

Link to post
Share on other sites

aldi ask for your registration number as you go out of the store and to punch the reg no of your car into their machine, we do this and also always keep our receipt, another aldi store does not have any of this and it does put you off shopping there at all after reading this post.

:p[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

totiesquoties

 

MY ADVICE IS BASED ON COMMON SENSE AND KNOWLEDGE FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, I AM NOT LEGALLY TRAINED, AND ALWAYS CHECK LEGAL ISSUES EITHER WITH A LEGAL PERSON, OR

THE APPROPRIATE LEGISLATION. :rolleyes:

IF I HAVE HELPED, PLEASE PRESS MY STAR, THANK YOU.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a little tip. If you are in a carpark covered by parking eye or similar and you realize you have overstayed your time, just cover your rear number plate as you leave.i have done this after accidently overstaying by 1hr and it has worked. they have to photgraph you leaving the car park to fine you but if they cannot see your number they cannot prove what car it was.i removed the cover as soon as i left the carpark so i did not break the law(i think) as the carpark is private land therefore not a requirement to show number plates.

I have unfortunatelly been a victim of parking eye.followed advice and ignored.like a bad smell they did go away!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have to photgraph you leaving the car park to fine you but if they cannot see your number they cannot prove what car it was.

 

but next time you drive into that car park and maybe stay for only a few minutes, you'll probably end up with a letter from them stating they want paying coz you appear to have been there 283 days 4 hours 53 minutes and 12 seconds! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi crem (and all)

Firstly I have to say that I had read through all the posts and came to the last one from crem, which tickled me enough to register and post an item!

 

I too have just received my first ParkingEye PCN letter, £80 to be paid by 17/11/11 or.....£50 if paid by 02/11/11 or.....£110 if there is a delay in payment, for staying 3 hours 55 mins in a 3 hour zone.

Now, before reading this site, I may have felt threatened enough by the official looking letter to produce that 'knee jerk' response of paying up immediately, but being semi-intelligent i did what all of you very intelligent people did, googled it and found this wonderful site (thank you guys xxxx). I now feel secure in ignoring the letter (and the ones to come).

It does annoy me though that I was parked in a very large retail park with 30 plus retail outlets to choose from (i'm female of course i'm going to look in every one before going back to the first shop i went in!!!!).....but if the retailers want us to spend our hard earned money with them....WHY oh WHY do they insist on only allowing 3 hours parking and using a rip off firm of bandits to try and enforce it.....Grrrr!!!!!!!

 

Keep up the good work and I will spread the word x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the retail outlet has fallen for the story peddled by the parking company that they need to have their car-park "managed" when, in fact they are offering a solution to a non-existent problem.

 

This is the same line peddled by the British Parking Association which says that PPCs "stop unauthorized parking and trespass". In fact, most "tickets" are issued to motorists who are invited to park on that land because they are customers of the supermarkets and shops, and then fall foul of the artificial silly rules invented by the parking company. Your case is a perfect example - 30 shops with just a three hour limit. That's just silly

Edited by DBC
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello.

 

A ParkingEye Parking PCN landed on our doormat recently. We recently made a visit to a MWSA accessible from both sides of the motorway. We visited twice in one day, but they've decided that we didn't leave and come back but just stayed all day. There's a picture of me driving in, and another of me leaving. They've handily ignored the fact we left, and then came back.

 

They're looking for £90, £60 if paid promptly.

 

I have a receipt from a petrol station that shows me to be 45 minutes drive away from the MWSA in question, at a time when they believe I'm parked up there.

 

I have an appeal letter ready to roll, along with a copy of the receipt.

 

Do I bother, or am I better ignoring it and not sending any correspondence to them? I assume by sending the appeal and arguing my case, I'm basically admitting that I'm the driver. Do I just sit tight?

 

Any advice would be most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Entirely up to you. In Nov 2009 I had a similar situation in a Morrison's car park, with documentary proof I was elsewhere. PE's so-called faultless APNR system alleged I was there for 8 hours. I wasn't going to spend a second of my time entering into pointless correspondence, so just ignored all their threatening letters. I'm still waiting for the court claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I bother, or am I better ignoring it and not sending any correspondence to them? I assume by sending the appeal and arguing my case, I'm basically admitting that I'm the driver. Do I just sit tight?

 

You've worked it out. Their 'appeal' process is just another fiction to mislead people into thinking it's a statutory process. Any information you give them is to their advantage not yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4598 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...