Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio - no CAA no default - discount offer - now PAP Letter


pencil
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 526 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 6 years later...

please tell us the full story as to why you sent a cca request

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

 

I have a DCA bothering me about a loan.

 

I asked for a copy of the alleged CCA agreement over a year ago,

gave the DCA multiple opportunities to provide it, and it still has not surfaced.

 

This week I received a 'Notice of Default' for 28 days hence.

 

How should I respond?

 

Thanks in advance for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA cant issue a default if they own the debt. If they dont own it and are trying to pressure on behalf of a company then the OC can add one.

 

Can you give more info please.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which they have never done.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because, as far as I am aware , most did not have the facility before. However just because they have not done it doesn't mean they can't.

If you look at the FCA register Cabot are the same now.

 

To be honest, for them it makes perfect sense, removes the time and trouble when a creditor doesn't default correctly. They can just fix it.

 

Not saying I like it or agree with it.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha its ruddy erudio and an slc loan.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've moved you into the slc forum

loads of like threads to read

but you really need to give us the full history.

 

in this instance

its not the same as a dca

 

although erudio are arrows in sheeps clothing...

its actually acting as a creditor so they can default you

 

however the history will tell us all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Can anyone offer me advice about this issue?

 

When Erudio first contacted me in 2014 I refused to fill in their new credit form, and asked to see the credit agreement, which they have not provided.

 

After a number of months I wrote back stating the account is in dispute,

that was almost five years ago.

 

I have received a few 'notice of default' letters since then but my credit score remains in the high 900s.

 

Last week it was passed to an inhouse DCA.

 

I received a number of missed mobile phone calls and they have also asked for information about my situation by post which I have not responded to.

 

My question is what is the likely chronology of approach by the DCA

and how should I proceed,

 

do I have to respond to their advances,

and if so,

how and when?

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More info needed.

 

Years you took out loans.

 

Deferment years completed.

 

Repayments made.

 

Are earnings above the threshold for repayment or have they ever been ?

 

People are being taken to court now, so don't presume it won't happen, if you ignored them.

 

Depends on the info needed above.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erudio are arrows are capquest

 

They failed the CCA

The debt is unenforceable

 

You ignore them

Unless/until you get a letter of claim

Or

A claim form

 

And they can't make it appear on your credit file either

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when was that CCA request and to whom?

is this showing on your credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to go read up

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

This week I too received a PAP from Fairfax.

It's been 5 1/2 years since I last deferred and acknowledged the debt

4 1/2 years since Erudio contacted me in 2014 to say they were managing my student loan and asked me to complete their form, which apparently would have amounted to a new contract with them, so I did not.

 

At the time I sent a CCA request by recorded delivery which has still not been provided, therefore the debt is in dispute I believe. I

replied to them a further two times during 2014 and simply reminded them of the CCA request.

I have not responded to them since.

 

In the four years since I have received

a default notice for 2016,

a letter of termination,

a letter apologising for missed statutory notices,

a letter saying capquest would manage the loan with an offer of settlement, and

now the letter stating it has been passed to Drydens and the PAP.

 

I intend to dispute the claim on the basis my CCA request of 2014 has not been fulfilled and therefore the debt is in dispute.

Is that satisfactory?

Is there a template I can use to craft my response to the PAP?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing.
Link to post
Share on other sites

you indicate an offer of settlement

do you mean a discount letter? if so lets see it in PDF read upload.

this is an important step I've been awaiting regarding disputed SLC loans.

 

yes there is a PAP temple, but we need to do one to emcompass student loans , I would feel better its customised somewhat

but its in the financial legal forum stickies.

 

dont reply yet please

and if I were to be honest, for future readers, i'd not even suggest replying to any other letters once a CCA fails, unless its a PAP letter of claim

OR

YOU HAVE MOVED and not informed the owner of your SLC debt of you new address IN WRITING.

do ever NOT assume that just because you get a phishing letter to where you are now they KNOW your correct address

its normally a pre-cursor to them instigating a backdoor claim to an old address hoping to get a default CCJ you know nowt about.

 

these APPEAR to be the only ones that are going anywhere near to a court at this stage in the erudio portfolio debacle

so don't fall foul of them as they WILL get a CCJ if they think they can file to an old address

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter of claim, which I believe is a PAP. I have ticked box 4 'I Dispute the Debt' and will explain on a separate page. A few questions, what should I say on the letter, should I enclose copy letters and do I need to sign the form?

 

 

Name of the Claimant ?

Drydens Fairfax solicitors

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.

22nd October 2018

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down.

 

-The amount owed is £9357.40 and no charges/interest are being added at this stage

-A statement of account is attached

-The agreement this debt relates to was entered between you and Student Loans Company on 12 June 1997 and assigned to Erudio Student Loans Limited on [no date] . A copy of the agreement can be requested using the reply form.

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?

No

 

What is the total value of the claim?

£9357.40

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?

Mortgage style student loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?

Before

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?

No

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

Originally with Student Loans Company, sold to Erudio, Passed to Capquest, and then to Dryden Fairfax.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

 

I received a notice of assignment from SLC to Eurdio.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

No, a letter of termination and two 'default' letters [no default on credit file] were received during 2016, and in 2018 I received a letter apologizing that no statutory notices had been sent out since the period of non-compliance started, which the letter states was 15 Dec 2017.

 

Why did you cease payments?

When the account was sold to Erudio in April 2014, I asked for copies of the credit agreements under CCA rules, which have not been forthcoming. I received a letter from their legal council in April 2014, and a duplicate letter in Dec 2014, stating they are 'investigating the matters raised and will be in contact in due course'. As far as I am concerned the debt is in dispute.

 

What was the date of your last payment?

I last deferred in April 2013.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

As above, I requested copy agreements under the CCA as soon as it was sold to Erudio.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon?

No

Link to post
Share on other sites

as have numerous people in this forum.

 

just look for the threads with drydens PAP letter in the title follow those.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...