Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP claiming I owe money from 1996


scooterist007
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

this morning I received a letter from the DWP claiming I owe £693.10!

 

I am confused as they state despite previous letters they still havnt received the money!

 

well this is the first letter I have got from them!

 

I phoned them up and they say its for a budgeting loan and a crisis loan taken out in feb and apr 1996!

 

now I cant remember what I got 14 years ago and asked her why it has taken 14 years to ask for the money back,

to which she replied that they didnt know where I live!!

 

well they know my national insurance number and I have been working for a long time paying tax and national insurance so I cant see how they cannot know where I live,

 

she said I have got to pay it back,

and I told her that it wasnt me because at the date and address she said,

I was living with my first wife and they said it was only in my name,

 

now if I had a loan at that time it would of had to of been a joint claim,

also I asked her that if I had these loans then I would of had to sign for it and she said yes,

 

i then asked her for proof that I had signed,

she said that they cant give me proof,

also one of the address they said I lived at,

I never heard of that address!

 

Now I cant believe that they can still chase a supposed debt after 14 years!

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only recover this by taking it from benefit you receive now or in the future.

 

They cannot enforce it via the court system.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that,

 

I did receive benefits about 3 months ago for about 3 months but they never took anything out then,

 

but can they still enforce it as its 14 years ago?

 

I was under the impression that a debt was clear after 10 years if say I owed it to a finance company?

 

Problem is that im sure I never took out this loan with them as they say it was only took out by me and the at that time I was with my first wife and living with her at the address they state at that time.

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I am now about to claim working tax credits, can they take it out of that?

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Statue barring is six years from finance companies (five in scotland) and the DWP have six years to enforce recovery via the courts

 

however they can recover from benefit no matter how much time has passed;

 

there is no time limit for recovery from benefit.

 

They don't take it from Tax Credit.

 

If at any point they did try to take it from benefit you should dispute it and involve your MP if necessary.

 

The benefits system can trace payments,

i.e what bank account a payment went into,

or what post office a giro was cashed at

and they have all of this on the computer system,

so should be able to trace where the payment was cashed at the time.

 

There should also be paper records held in remote storage as claim files in relation to loans don't get destroyed until 6 months after the loan has been repaid at the minimum, though some are held for longer.

 

A claim file will consist of the original application form and the offer letter which is signed in agreement to the loan along with any prints from your computer record in relation to the claims.

 

They should be able to produce something in support of their claim that you owe this debt;

if they cannot provide proof your MP should be able to intervene on your behalf to cease the arrestment of your benefit and refund any payments taken up until that point.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did ask them about how the payment was made and she said it was a giro and gave me the name of the post office it was cashed at,

 

I also asked her that if I had a loan then I would of had to of filled out a form and signed it and she said yes,

but when I asked if I could see it she said that they cannot give it to me as they dont have it anymore,

 

I also said to her that my ex wife had also had some debts and one was from council tax and I had to pay it as it was taken out of my wages ordered from the court,

 

even though I had left her and had never lived at the address they said the money was owed and was only in her name,

 

but the dwp kept stating that it was a loan taken out in my name only,

which I find confusing as any benefit was a joint claim with my ex wife!

 

The dwp stated that I should phone up the job centre thats dealing with it which is southampton,

but at the time I was living in nottingham!

 

I did try ringing them today but they was closed.

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council Tax and Benefits are dealt with by two seperate bodies, so the DWP cannot become involved in that (and will not show any interest in it, trust me) - but I can't understand how the council would get a liability order without proof that you were liable for council tax for that address. I would suggest you start a thread in the relevant forum about the council tax.

 

In joint claims to benefit there is only one person who is the "claimant", the other is the "partner". With joint claims only the main claimant of the qualifying benefit can apply for and sign the acceptance to receive the loan; the partner cannot claim in their own right.

 

They won't have the paperwork on site, as it will be stored in remote storage. The office who are dealing with it should be able to place a request for the file to be returned to them from remote storage.

 

The way benefits are delivered have changed drastically from 14 years ago. Social Fund (for budgeting and crisis loans) are no longer dealt with by your local office or by the office which dealt with your claim at the time as they have all been centralised to benefit delivery centres. It won't be a jobcentre that is dealing with it; jobcentres don't deal with Social Fund.

 

However if you are in employment at the moment it's likely your case will be transferred to the debt management centre.

 

The place that is currently dealing with the recovery will be on the top of the letters about it, and they should deal with any queries you have, not refer you elsewhere. My advise is to get your MP involved; they'll move sharpish then. If they can't produce the paperwork to prove you owe money they can't collect on it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be amazed if they can produce a social fund application from 14 years ago:rolleyes:.

 

If I were you I would write to them and keep everything in writing as opposed to telephone conversations.

 

I would be asking them to prove the debt was yours and produce the proof, as Erika says, no proof no paying up!

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

hecky t heck dont pay them a penny,

its obviosly not ur debt do not respond to the idiots

they havent got a clue wot ther doin,

 

it wud of been someone bored stiff one day typing letters up to evry tom dick n harry,

i wish they wud pull there finger out and notice my ex sister in law was a benefit thief and has been for years...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

well an update!

 

haven't heard anything from them all this time,

and tonight come home from work

and a letter from them saying i owe money blah blah blah,

 

rung them up and told them i am not paying as you cant prove i owe it,

and the guy said that the case is being put to the courts,

would the courts do anything about this after 16 years?

 

I asked the guy to prove i had a debt and he said yes cos it was on his screen!!!!

 

he also said that they have been pursuing debts from the 80's from people,

I want to know how i stand about this cos going by what he said i think i will either get a letter from the courts or be getting a visit from a debt collector.

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked him if the address to send the sar to was the same address thats on the letter i got and he said theres no point as he could tell me all the info which was nothing really!

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send your SAR request to the local DWP office for the attention of the DATA protection Officer.

 

On the SAR form it give you space to name the offices which dealt with you claim and check that you want both clerical and computerised records in regards to Debts, and Loans and anything else you require.

 

(Get the debt info as it will have the diary entries of contact with you since 1996.)

 

You can fill it in on PC and print it off.

 

However it does take 40 days plus the days it takes to land on DPO's desk

so you still need to deal with the matters in hand.

 

I got my pdf copy of SAR from from a post by Erika on this forum. :)

Posted here again I think...

Edited by lucksic
additional information.
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that lucksid

 

what do you find odd nystagmite?

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can request a written statement of reason.

(WSOR) address this to the DM team at the Gloucestershire address,

 

remember to put your NI no on your letter of request.

 

Then you should get at least a copy of a screen print and an explanation of how the alleged debt was incurred.

 

Post everything signed for service and keep copies of everything you send or ask for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be amazed if they can produce a social fund application from 14 years ago:rolleyes:. If I were you I would write to them and keep everything in writing as opposed to telephone conversations. I would be asking them to prove the debt was yours and produce the proof, as Erika says, no proof no paying up!

 

Back then it would have been the old DHSS offices and mostly still ran on paper work !

 

There most be some huge warehouses somewhere stocked up with huge mountains of DHSS paper work,with someone going over with a fine-tooth comb.

 

and costing a fortune to administer...

1aK+F4PJ7cBm32CUNiyI2GAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...
Ok update, the dwp have taken money from my wages, can they do this without a court order?

 

What, they did nothing at all since your last post in April 2012 and then you suddenly found a deduction from wages in January 2018 with no prior warning?

 

Back in 2012 you were intending to submit a SAR.

 

Did you?

 

What happened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What, they did nothing at all since your last post in April 2012 and then you suddenly found a deduction from wages in January 2018 with no prior warning? Back in 2012 you were intending to submit a SAR. Did you? What happened?

 

Well I never heard anything until recently,

 

I got a letter saying they were going to pursue the debt,

 

I then got another letter saying they were going to take money from my wages then when I got my wage slip they had,

I wasn't happy,

I didn't submit a sar as I heard no more and I really don't know where to send it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did this to me, They wrote to me about £104 i owed, I thought it was a bit odd because i have claimed nothing for over 30 years

 

I spoke to them and they couldn't tell me what it was for, But said it was from 1984 and i must have worked and claimed benefits at the same time

 

I told them that didn't happen, The next week they took it straight from my wages is one go

 

It seems if they think you owe anything from anytime, They will take it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...