Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
    • I want to add my 2 cents here...  The purchase of this debt, Perch Group dont absolve themselves of liabilities from the Original Creditor. They should be responsible for dealing with this complaint in response to an Irresponsible Lending dispute.  If the balance is disputed as such in that way - Then they should be referring to the Original Creditor where applicable.    Also if your complaint was written in a way where a template wasnt used or it was rewritten to a similar effect where it wasnt recognisable - Then you probably would have stood a better opportunity at it not getting rebuffed.  To be honest those - Perch and TM Legal are a waste of Oxygen and will say anything to get you to pay.    Ditto on the template. Where did you find it?  Please keep in mind we have to unravel what you have done till now and help build a formal response.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Find out here if your local court is staying claims


ICY
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 752
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey Millem, good to see another Edmonton wallah, thanks for that good news

 

I got my two court dates this week, my NW one only today in the same post as Cobbetts letter asking for a stay

 

Am i right to think that if a person has a court date already, the earliest the stay will be considered will be on the court day and all person need do is take his argument against the stay along with all his other paperwork?

 

Hi Micky - I've been to Court over this today, looks like your claim will be stayed unless you convince the Judge otherwise - which I failed to do using the standard arguments in the objection letter on this site;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/93278-car2403-natwest.html#post1084765

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, Morpeth and Berwick appears to have dropped off the list? (The Court is still there - I've just been! ;) )

 

 

Its still on the list dont worry it hasnt gone anywhere

 

 

 

 

 

All the below courts have said SOME cases will be stayed whilst the outcome of the test case is decided, this affects current account claims, CREDIT CARD CLAIMS ARE STILL AS NORMAL REGARDLESS OF THE TEST CASE:

 

 

11. Morpeth and Berwick County Court,

 

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be very useful if you could post what your local court has told you regarding stay on claims due to the OFT report. We dont need to know what the banks said, we all know they will just tell us that they have a stay and that is that.

I am Hoping that this list will help in our argument to have stays set aside, by demonstrating to judges that (at the moment) the majority of courts are continuing with claims on a case by case basis, which is a fair and just way to continue.

Remember that if your claim is involving a credit card claim, then it should NOT be stayed, and if it is you should appeal this decision immediatly.

I also hope to raise the awareness a bit, it may give us all a bit of hope if anyone was fearing the banks letters were right saying all cases were stayed when in fact they werent.

 

All the below seem to be playing by a case by case basis and appear to be all proceeding as normal with current account claims, CREDIT CARD CLAIMS ARE STILL AS NORMAL REGARDLESS OF THE TEST CASE:

 

1. Aldershot & Farnham County Court,

2. Bishop Auckland County Court,

3. Blackburn County Court, NEW CLAIMS BEING STAYED

4. Bow County Court,

5. Bristol County Court, NEW CLAIMS BEING STAYED

6. Caernarfon County Court,

7. Chichester County Court,

8. Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court,

9. Croydon County Court,

10. Gloucestershire Family and Civil Courts,

11. Grantham County Court,

12. Hull County Court,

13. Ipswich County Court,

14. Keighley County Court,

15. Kettering County Court,

16. Lancaster County Court,

17. Leeds Combined Court Centre,

18. Liverpool Civil and Family Court,

19. Medway County Court,

20. Milton Keynes County Court,

21. Newcastle County Court,

22. Northampton County Court,

23. North Shields County Court,

24. Norwich County Court,

25. Oxford Combined Court Centre,

26. Romford County Court,

27. Salford County Court,

28. Scun.thorpe County Court,

29. Slough County Court,

30. St.Helens County Court Merseyside

31. Stoke-on-Trent Combined Court,

32. Sunderland County Court,

33. Thanet County Court,

34. Warrington and Runcorn County Courts,

35. Watford County Court, NEW CLAIMS BEING STAYED

36. Wellingborough County Court,

37. Welshpool and Newton County Court,

38. Woolwich County Court,

39. Worcester County Court,

40. Wrexham Count Court,

41. York County Court

 

All the below courts have said SOME cases will be stayed whilst the outcome of the test case is decided, this affects current account claims, CREDIT CARD CLAIMS ARE STILL AS NORMAL REGARDLESS OF THE TEST CASE:

 

1. Altrincham County Court,

2. Ashford County Court,

3. Aylesbury County Court,

4. Barnsley County Court,

5. Bournemouth County Court,

6. Bury County Court,

7. Carlisle Combined Court Centre,

8. Chester County Court,

9. Dartford County Court,

10. Derby Combined Court Centre,

11. Durham County Court,

12. Edmonton County Court,

13. Hastings County Court,

14. Hitchin County Court,

15. Mansfield County Court,

16. Morpeth and Berwick County Court,

17. Portsmouth Combined Court Centre,

18. Redditch County Court,

19. Rotherham County Court,

20. Scarborough County Court,

21. Sheffield Laws Courts,

22. Southampton Combined Court Centre,

23. Stockport County Court,

24. Wandsworth County Court,

25. West London County Court,

26. Winchester Combined Court,

 

All the below courts have said ALL cases will be stayed, whilst the outcome of the test case is decided this affects current account claims, CREDIT CARD CLAIMS ARE STILL AS NORMAL REGARDLESS OF THE TEST CASE:

 

1. Birkenhead County Court,

2. Blackpool County Court,

3. Bolton Combined Court Centre,

4. Bradford County Court,

5. Brighton County Court,

6. Canterbury Combined Court Centre,

7. Cardiff Civil Justice Centre,

8. Chorley County Court,

9. Doncaster County Court,

10. Exeter Combined County Centre,

11. Gateshead County Court,

12. Guildford County Court,

13. Halifax County Court,

14. Leicester County Court,

15. Luton County Court,

16. Maidstone Combined Court Centre,

17. Nottingham County Court,

18. Oldham County Court,

19. Peterborough Combined Court Centre,

20. Plymouth Combined Court,

21. Poole County Court,

22. Preston Combined Court Centre,

23. Rhyl County Court,

24. Rugby County Court,

25. St Albans County Court,

26. Southend County Court,

27. Taunton County Court,

28. Telford County Court,

29. Torquay and Newton Abbot County Court,

30. Weston-Super-Mare County Court,

31. Weymouth and Dorchester Combined Court Centre,

 

The situation at the below is still unclear:

 

1. Aberdare County Court,

2. Aberysthwyth County Court,

3. Accrington County Court,

4. Banbury County Court,

5. Barnet Civil and Family Courts Centre,

6. Barnstaple County Court,

7. Barrow-in-Furness County Court,

8. Basildon Combined Court,

9. Basingstoke County Court,

10. Bath County Court,

11. Bedford County Court,

12. Birmingham Civil Justice Centre,

13. Blackwood County Court,

14. Bodmin County Court,

15. Boston County Court,

16. Brecon Law Courts,

17. Brentford County Court,

18. Bridgend Law Courts,

19. Bromley County Court,

20. Burnley Combined Court Centre,

21. Burton-upon-tweed County Court,

22. Bury St Edmonds County Court,

23. Buxton County Court,

24. Cambridge County Court,

25. Carmarthen County Court,

26. Central London County Court,

27. Chelmsford County Court,

28. Cheltenham County Court,

29. Chesterfield County Court,

30. Colchester County Court,

31. Consett County Court,

32. Conwy and Colwyn County Court,

33. Coventry Combined Court Centre,

34. Crewe County Court,

35. Croyden County Court,

36. Darlington County Court,

37. Dewsbury County Court,

38. Dudley County Court,

39. Eastbourne County Court,

40. Epsom County Court,

41. Evesham County Court,

42. Gravesend County Court,

43. Great Grimsby Combined Court Centre,

44. Harlow County Court,

45. Harrogate County Court,

46. Hartlepool County Court,

47. Haverfordwest County Court,

48. Haywards Heath County Court,

49. Hereford County Court,

50. High Wycombe County Court,

51. Horsham County Court,

52. Huddersfield County Court,

53. Huntingdon County Court,

54. Ilford County Court,

55.Kendall County Court,

56. Kidderminster County Court,

57. Kings Lynne County Court,

58. Kingston-upon-Thames County Court,

59. Lambeth County Court,

60. Leigh County Court,

61. Lewes Combined Court Centre,

62. Lincoln County Court,

63. Llanelli County Court,

64. Llangefni County Court,

65. Lowestoft County Court,

66. Ludlow County Court,

67. Macclesfield County Court,

68. Manchester County Court (Crown Square)

69. Manchester County Court (Deansgate)

70. Melton Moybray County Court,

71. Merthyr Tydfil Combined Court Centre,

72. Middlesbrough County Court,

73. Mold County Court,

74. Neath and Port Talbot County Court,

75. Nelson County Court,

76. Newark County Court,

77. Newbury County Court,

78. Newport (Gwent) County Court,

79. Newport (Isle of Wight) County Court,

80. Northwich Magistrates and County Court,

81. Nuneaton County Court,

82. Oswestry County Court,

83. Penrith County Court,

84. Penzance County Court,

85. Pontefract County Court,

86. Pontypool County Court,

87. Pontypridd County Court,

88. Rawenstall County Court,

89. Reading County Court,

90. Reigate County Court,

91. Salisbury Crown and County Court,

92. Shrewsbury County Court,

93. Skegness County Court,

94. Skipton County Court,

95. South Sheilds County Court,

96. Southend County Court,

97. Southport County Court,

98. Southwark County Court,

99. Stafford Combined Court Centre,

100. Staines County Court,

101. Stourbridge County Court,

102. Stratford-upon-Avon County Court,

103. Swansea Civil Justice Centre,

104. Swindon Combined Court,

105. Tameside County Court,

106. Tamworth County Court,

107. Teesside Combined Court Centre,

108. Trowbridge County Court,

109. Truro County Court,

110. Tunbridge Wells County Court,

111. Uxbridge County Court,

112. Wakefield County Court,

113. Walsall Hearing Centre - County Court,

114. Warwick Combined Court Centre,

115. Whitehaven County Court,

116. Wigan County Court,

117. Willesden County Court,

118. Wolverhampton Combined Court Centre,

119. Workshop County Court,

120. Worthing County Court,

121. Yeovil County Court,

 

IF YOU HAVE HAD YOUR CASE STAYED CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT WHAT TO DO NEXT AND HOW TO APPLY TO HAVE STAY SET ASIDE

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a letter from Grantham county court - case due to be heard on Monday 20th, I wrote to them asking for default judgement as Abbey had not complied with order to submit bundle but it has been stayed pending outcome of OFT case. I am fuming, Abbey have walked all over the leagl process, not complied with court orders yet still they get a stay :( To add insult to injury I received yet more bank charges today because I am over my limit due to the blooming charges aaaargh!!!!!!!!!

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mickey the hippo:

 

>Am i right to think that if a person has a court date already, the earliest

>the stay will be considered will be on the court day and all person need do

>is take his argument against the stay along with all his other paperwork?

 

Not sure about this fella, best to check with one of the banana experts on the board about this. Good luck with the case - i'm due up on 31st Augst. Just had a letter in the post form the court saying:

 

"Judge does not think special directions are appropriate in his view, court case remains listed"

 

Get in my old son!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Add Bournemouth County Court to the list, had letter this morning

 

"The case be stayed pending the final resolution (being the judgement in the action or of the final appellate court. whichever is the later) of the case brought by the Office of Fair Trading in respect of the matter of bank charges"

If my advice has been helpful please feel free to click on my scales :grin:

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner (CCA request letter N)and other templates)

 

Debt Collection Agencies & Statutory Demands, a few strategies

 

Abbey charges, Won

B-card non-disclosure of S.A.R, WON £30 costs awarded

B-Card, court for harrasement, failed to defend WON £175 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/125554-28-days-later-no.html#post1422508

B-Card charges, partial refund, still fighting

Vanquis-Cabot, GIVEN UP :lol:

HFC & my mum, no brainer, no CCA http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/133330-hfc-my-mum.html#post1404514

 

PLEASE donate to CAG however small. They are fighting for YOUR rights as a consumer. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the below seem to be playing by a case by case basis and appear to be all proceeding as normal with current account claims, CREDIT CARD CLAIMS ARE STILL AS NORMAL REGARDLESS OF THE TEST CASE:

 

 

3. Blackburn County Court, NEW CLAIMS BEING STAYED

 

Are Blackburn carrying on as normal on CREDIT CARD CLAIMS or staying all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see from the above Croydon CC is listed in two places - Business as usual, and situation unclear.

 

Is anyone able to confirm?

 

TIA :)

 

 

Fixed now, my apologies, last i heard Croydon are looking on a case by case basis

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received a letter from Kingston-Upon-Hull County Court saying that they are staying my case :

 

"This case is stayed until further orde with a view to awaiting the final decision in the test case (which shall be interpreted as the outcome of any appeal or the expiry of time for permission to appel the first instance decision)."

 

Para. 4 states:

"Either party may apply at any time, by application on notice in accordance with Civil Procedure Rules 1998 part 23, to lift the stay."

 

Yet Para 5 states:

"Because this order has been made by the Court without considering representations from the parties, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed. A party wishing to make an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot,

 

No, the claim is not recently filed, but has been ongoing for a while. I first filed it with MCOL at the beginning of April, but because of mistakes in the Particulars of Claim, which I had to ammend, I was told could no longer deal with the claim online and had to communicate with the Northampton court by phone and mail - then later the Hull County Court.

 

SC&M had made me a conditional offer to settle in full, which I'd declined and returned a day or so before the OFT announcement. (Now I think I should have accepted the offer but struck out the conditions - anyway, that's life!)

 

So, I was awaiting a date for a hearing from Kinston-Upon-Hull County Court, but then the OFT thing happened. I received the "General Form of Judgment or Order" letter last week - dated 14 August.

 

I've downloaded the n244 form and the updated (GaryH version) text for part C of that form. Armed with these, I think I will apply for the stay to be lifted. I'll probably deliver the application to the court on Monday - with my additional fee of around £35.00.

 

Get back to me, zoot, if you require further info.

 

jomo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MtH,

 

I know, it does sound a little crazy -

 

but firstly because of the conditions attached, which would have meant that I wouldn't be able to claim for further charges applied to my account since I started the claim, and in the future;

 

and secondly because of an error on the agreement form that SC&M wanted me to sign: to cut a long story short, I had to change (slightly) the name of the claimant on ther PoC from what it was initially - when the claim was first started. When SC&M sent me the agreement form, it had the original claimant name. I felt that even if I signed it it wouldn't be worth the paper it was written on. So when I wrote back declining the offer I also asked them to change the name of the claimant to what it should be.

 

If the error in the claimant name hadn't been an issue, I would probably have struck out the conditions and signed the agreement.

 

I hope I've explained that clearly - I was a bit confused with all this when I first issued the claim, hence that initial error in the PoC.

 

jomo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...