Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dealing with Cabot 101/Cabot threads.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4432 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

How very convenient that the statement claims in increase upto 2009. I suspect the increase is entirely based on their additional charges added by them to make it look as if the debt is still enforceable.

 

Write back & tell them you do not acknowledge any debt AND whilst your fully aware of their unlawful attempts to make the debt enforceable you will not be making any payment whatsoever & that you will dispute any such claim most vigorously.

 

Furthermore if they persist in harassing you you will report them to the authorities

 

Please note Cabot really are a appalling firm who have a lot of enemies both here & elsewhere so don't weaken............ their day of reckon approaches

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi folks, I have just sent a letter today to the Cabot jokers, they sent 5 letters from January to present with the same waffle about trying to get CCAb but were experiencing difficulties, then in last letter admitted twice they were over the time limit set out but would continue to try, they even suggested I should approach original lender myself - I couldn't stop laughing at that one. I did not mess around - told them that as no proof - i consider the matter closed and if they continued to send me drivel I would report them to every conceivable authority even my M.P,

Its like me asking a company for a copy of prices that I have paid in the past because my accountant needs the info within a certain time, if they can't supply in time then I would say that I have never bought the goods in the first place because they failed to supply in legally requested time, in other words CABOT - NULL AND VOID.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

My mum, who has held a Halifax Visa Card for a number of years, recently passed away leaving an outstanding balance on her credit card in the region of £15,000. The account was passed to Blair, Oliver, & Scott for recovery, which was enforced over 12 months ago. My mum was paying these people a minimum amount of £40.00 per month with an additional 'cash' payment of £500.00 every 6 months after they reviewed the case, Now that mum has passed away, could any one advise me on what I should do now before I complete the probate forms as I can see that any monies left in my mums estate will not even be enough to pay them 'off' let alone the verbal bequest my mum left to her 2 grandchildren. My mum had no assets apart from 2 life assurance policies & approx' £3,000 in her bank account (not Halifax or BOS)

Please Help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My mum, who has held a Halifax Visa Card for a number of years, recently passed away leaving an outstanding balance on her credit card in the region of £15,000. The account was passed to Blair, Oliver, & Scott for recovery, which was enforced over 12 months ago. My mum was paying these people a minimum amount of £40.00 per month with an additional 'cash' payment of £500.00 every 6 months after they reviewed the case, Now that mum has passed away, could any one advise me on what I should do now before I complete the probate forms as I can see that any monies left in my mums estate will not even be enough to pay them 'off' let alone the verbal bequest my mum left to her 2 grandchildren. My mum had no assets apart from 2 life assurance policies & approx' £3,000 in her bank account (not Halifax or BOS)

Please Help!!!

 

Hi and welcome to the forum, my condolences to you. Not a pleasant way to have to finalise things, but I would suggest you sent Blair Oliver & Scott, who are the solicitors of B O S (one of the same) a request for a copy of any agreement your late mother had. I've never had a bereavement to deal with personally like you so there may be other remedies available, but first thing we'd tell anyone on here is to establish there was an agreement, a legally enforceable agreement at that to be dealt with. We call that a CCA request which costs £1. they have 12 working days + 2 for postage to supply then they cannot enforce anything until it is supplied.

 

If it is possible, post the agreement with personal details removed on the forum for us to look at and we can give you an idea if there are any abnomalities with it which means they will have difficulties enforcing anything.

 

The CCA request letters are here in the debt Collectors templates library http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

 

Good luck, come back and let us know how you get on..

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sorry to hear about your mum. My mum died a few years ago, owing around 8000 to Cahoot, when I wrote to Cahoot, they asked for a copy of the death certificate and then wrote it off. I would also look at getting any monies your mum had left, to be "appropriated" to her funeral costs and to other costs. the Nationwide tried to take nearly 1000 from my mum's account to pay her Nationwide credit card off, I got advice from the Citizens advice bureau, and I would have to go back to my paperwork, but maybe someone on the forum would know, it is called "right of appropriation or something.... Help anyone

 

Bump

  • Haha 1

LilythePink

If you liked what I said, and if it helped in any way, please tip my scales..... thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rest assured like any debt it must be proved & you have a duty to ensure the estate is liable to pay it. As the estates representative you should now write to them requesting they provide proof of this is the case ie true copy agreement etc

 

My BH works in private client & she now challenges every such demand for payment on the basis of 'prove it' & if they can't tough! Her duty is to the beneficiaries not the lenders ............ most credit cards & many loans carry life insurance........... have you checked

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally had a CCA supplied to my request 03/09, Cabot bought from MBNA 10yrs ago, I had been paying small amounts each month until the request. O/S at that time was approx £8200, they now want £9900!! It works out at approx 60%pa.

 

The CCA is actually a App form (says all over it;)), MBNA have confirmed to me in writing that they cannot the original due to storage issues, destroyed methinks. The T & C's have no link to the app, just terms from about the right time, so their scuppered there as well.

 

Can anyone advise if they have cocked up by adding the extra on (not the first time, 6yrs ago £1700)?

 

Thanks

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that they cannot claim this interest. Cabot try do it all the time amd when they take people to court claim s. 9 County Court Act (or something similar, it's late) in their poc.

 

If they haven't got a valid CCA they cannot claim the debt at all

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a look at the County Court Act, interesting, cannot claim any interest apart from that stated in the agreement if it is regulated by the CCA 1974. Sent a letter off today, so will see how it goes.:)

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that they cannot claim this interest. Cabot try do it all the time amd when they take people to court claim s. 9 County Court Act (or something similar, it's late) in their poc.

 

I was informed once a long time ago that when Cabot buy the debt they automatically began charging 12% on it for their own coffers. So, a £1000 debt bought for say 10% cost Cabot £100 to buy. They then charge you interest on the £1000 @ 12% = £120 in the first year. There's something very wrong with that morally.

 

I was then told that they can claim the contractual interest on the agreement as they buy the 'rights' to the debt .

 

I was then told that once they buy the debt and they write to you, if you come to an agreement with them to repay and default they then have a right to charge their 12%.

 

But then I also discovered that Cabot do not get copies of ANY agreements from the original creditors and have to send away for them which invariably puts the account and Cabot into default (because they haven't supplied your CCA request within the 12 + 2 working day prescribed period) which means they cannot take any further action until they can supply it which is why Cabot showed a £9.7 million profit when we were not asking for our agreements and why they turned that into a £6.2 million loss when we did - a swing of £17 - £18 million loss in one year.

 

Keep it Simple - ask for the agreement...CCA them ..

Keep up the good work everyone :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That issue regarding interest is, well, interesting!

 

If what Andrew1 writes is indeed the case, in his example of a debt bought for £100, with 12% interest charged on the "£1,000 face value" of the debt, then that is 120% profit in year one.

 

That said, it is only an ACCOUNTING profit, and unable to be ever collected in the majority of cases. Much like the firms of OCs, banks and DCAs, they can accruw massive amounts in interest, penalties and other "charges" which flatter their "accounting profits" but are never likely to ever turn into real cash. Hence they eventually have to write this off as "uncollectble" and losses arise to them.

 

It would be interesting to actually see a detailed breakdown of what thes firms can and cannot charge by ay of interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That issue regarding interest is, well, interesting!

 

 

That said, it is only an ACCOUNTING profit, and unable to be ever collected in the majority of cases.

 

You say it is only an ACCOUNTING profit, but how many people have been and continue to pay Cabot through ignorance? How many people have been taken to court without the guidance of CAG and lost, thus having CCjs?

I know that they buy debts for a fraction of their value, however their letters and threats do intimidate people and they will pay, often more than they can afford and for a period of time that will ensure that they do startto pay interest on interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was informed once a long time ago that when Cabot buy the debt they automatically began charging 12% on it for their own coffers. So, a £1000 debt bought for say 10% cost Cabot £100 to buy. They then charge you interest on the £1000 @ 12% = £120 in the first year. There's something very wrong with that morally.

 

I was then told that they can claim the contractual interest on the agreement as they buy the 'rights' to the debt .

 

I was then told that once they buy the debt and they write to you, if you come to an agreement with them to repay and default they then have a right to charge their 12%.

 

But then I also discovered that Cabot do not get copies of ANY agreements from the original creditors and have to send away for them which invariably puts the account and Cabot into default (because they haven't supplied your CCA request within the 12 + 2 working day prescribed period) which means they cannot take any further action until they can supply it which is why Cabot showed a £9.7 million profit when we were not asking for our agreements and why they turned that into a £6.2 million loss when we did - a swing of £17 - £18 million loss in one year.

 

Keep it Simple - ask for the agreement...CCA them ..

Keep up the good work everyone :D

 

Thank you for that information, their method of adding interest does appear to be interesting, with vast quantities being added the moment that you stop playing nicely :eek: and question them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That issue regarding interest is, well, interesting!

 

If what Andrew1 writes is indeed the case, in his example of a debt bought for £100, with 12% interest charged on the "£1,000 face value" of the debt, then that is 120% profit in year one.

 

That said, it is only an ACCOUNTING profit, and unable to be ever collected in the majority of cases. Much like the firms of OCs, banks and DCAs, they can accruw massive amounts in interest, penalties and other "charges" which flatter their "accounting profits" but are never likely to ever turn into real cash. Hence they eventually have to write this off as "uncollectble" and losses arise to them.

 

It would be interesting to actually see a detailed breakdown of what thes firms can and cannot charge by ay of interest.

 

That said, it is only an ACCOUNTING profit, and unable to be ever collected in the majority of cases.

 

If Cabot collect from just one person that is one person too many. Accounting profit my foot! :eek: , if they could get away with it like they did for the years and years prior to us getting at them don't tell me they wouldn't. The WHOLE practice has to STOP and it's about time the OFT and the likes put and end to it. The more people complain about them, the more chance this will come to an end..It is immoral, will remain immoral and should be against the laws of common decency and proper business practice. I ran a business for 30 yrs and I have no issues with people making a profit, even a healthy profit, but they do this on the backs of people who know no different and cannot often fend for themselves like some of us can.

 

I sat in a cafe a while ago and a young girl with a baby was called on her mobile by one of these dross dca outfits who were obviously giving her hell. I saw what she was going through fending them off...she was shaken to say the least. I didn't know her from Adam, but she was left in no uncertain terms on how to deal with them and the name of CAG to go to. The Majority sadly don't have access to what we do and therefore all that is keeping outfits like Cabot going are these rip-off charges nobody knows how to deal with. One girl said to me she was going to go bankrupt for £5k's worth of debt because she didn't know how to handle these people. It's an outrage and these people must continue to be shot down at every opportunity UNTIL they abide by the law and have some kind of moral code, THEN and only then will they be able to ply their trade legitimately for the purpose for which they are there - and there is a need regrettably because not everyone on our side of the fence is a 'can't pay' they are 'Won't pays' and they have a moral responsibility and to be chased.

 

A1

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree 100% with Andrew1's last post. To clarify, by "accounting profit" in my recent post, I meant that they just add and add interest and penalties. A lot/most of that is NOT collected in the end so the DCAs are deluding themselves that this is real "money" profit.

 

That said, I wholehearedly agree that one person paying them when they should not is one person too many.

 

For those of us who know their rights, it is hard enough fending off these leeches. For those that do not, and think DCAs have some form of legitimacy, then it is a real shame. The only remedy is to somehow get the message out to more and more people.

 

I note in some letters from OCs they try to suggest people contact CCCS or Citizen's Advice. Maybe they shoud also be forced to put a reference to the Consumer Action - which is about the only place people can get proper advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would point out that I think Cabot are on shaky ground on the interest issue, with regards to the rights n duties bit. They sent me an app form and a sheet of T & C's, supposedly the reverse of the app form;), in there it states MBNA can cancel the contract only after giving 30 days notice (not done so) and it also says that they can assign the "Rights and Benefits". Note not just part but both. When it comes to interest charges, they say will notify of any amendments (another never have done), never received anything from Cabot either. So they have allegedly bought a debt that the T & C's they rely on state they buy the rights n duties, something Cabot always say they dont.

 

Comments on how can interest be charged when a contract has been terminated then sold, no agreement exists so why do they think they can interest? Different if assigned, but not terminated methinks.

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

am in the process of a f+f with cabgrot have only been paying token £1 since june on a £9230 debt they bought off halifux [ oops sorry my spelling is so rubbish :D]

 

ive offered £3200 they want £4800

they have cca

but know they only paid p/nuts im off sick = lost my job

any advice do l stick to my offer ??? :confused:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]DONT GET MAD .....GET EVEN 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

am in the process of a f+f with cabgrot have only been paying token £1 since june on a £9230 debt they bought off halifux [ oops sorry my spelling is so rubbish :D]

 

ive offered £3200 they want £4800

they have cca

but know they only paid p/nuts im off sick = lost my job

any advice do l stick to my offer ??? :confused:

 

Do you have your own thread on this case?

Are you sure the CCA is enforceable? Has it been checked out?

Did you ever receive a default notice before the account was terminated?

Is there a significant amount of the balance made up of unfair charges?

Was this a loan or credit card? If so, was there any mis-sold PPI?

 

Without knowing more of the circumstances, it is impossible to give specific advice.

 

If you haven't yet started a thread, that is the first step.

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

That issue regarding interest is, well, interesting!

 

If what Andrew1 writes is indeed the case, in his example of a debt bought for £100, with 12% interest charged on the "£1,000 face value" of the debt, then that is 120% profit in year one.

 

That said, it is only an ACCOUNTING profit, and unable to be ever collected in the majority of cases. Much like the firms of OCs, banks and DCAs, they can accruw massive amounts in interest, penalties and other "charges" which flatter their "accounting profits" but are never likely to ever turn into real cash. Hence they eventually have to write this off as "uncollectble" and losses arise to them.

 

It would be interesting to actually see a detailed breakdown of what thes firms can and cannot charge by ay of interest.

 

What Andrew1 is stating here is very much the truth - don't doubt it for a moment.

 

The key to seeing how Cabot operate is within the SAR papers we can all get off them. There will be a section which is like a diary of events within the SAR. The section usually reads "landscape" across the pages it'll read often as follows -

 

DAY xx/xx/xxxx - date of purchased debt

Send goodbye letter on headed paper from Original Lender.

Send Hello letter from Cabots = often we'll see these in same envelope depends on which member of staff deals with it - but post mark on envelope is usually the give away. You'll see where they add the interest commented on the screens diary. (on the sale document is where the interest amount is usually written - I found it was 12% on the document I had they forgot to blank it out)

 

they'll sit on the account for years till year 5 allowing it to accumulate interest till they ready to collect - the diary pages are updated monthly showing how the balance rises with the added interest. You'll see loads of telephone calls made by their messaging services - where their automated dialler calls to annoy you. They'll do this till they ready to try collect debt. THEN

 

DAY XX/XX/XXXX - DO LAND REGISTRY SEARCH TO ASSESS - this way they see whether it is worth taking person to court, going for a charging order cause they can more or less guess whether there is equity in the property and whether person is renting or buying property. Land Registry will show loans with dates already charged to a property = a useful tool inassessing when last loan was taken out and who with (they'll see whether subprime lenders/high st banks etc.., when loan was taken out etc.. ) so it's a pretty useful tool for them to use? They can pretty much cherry pick the people they think have the money to pay them by looking and guessing the equity available in a home.

 

DAY XX/XX/XXXX - Send pre lim letter asking for money. Using their solicitors letter headed paper (It used to be Hodsons - but more recently it's Morgans acting as their in house solicitors)

 

DAY XX/XX/XXXX - Send LBA letter threatening court action.

 

And then they'll file an online court claim.

 

This is all in the Subject Access Request diary pages - you'll spot the patterns and see the templates being used and the interest being added.

 

It's all there if you read the details - Cabots seem to follow same patterns with their collections.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a valid cca arrives. Assignment cannot put debtor in a worse position, therefore if OC is charging a lower interest rate now surely Cabot are bound by the same terms? If contract terminated by OC interest cannot be charged unless there is a clause within cca allowing so.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What this Aktiv guy says is true. A debt purchaser CAN charge interest up to the contractual rate allowed for in any agreement (if one existed in the first place obviously), but cannot charge more, which would effectively be prejudicial to you, the debtor.

 

As Andrew1 says, Cabot's standard rate is 12%, irrespective of the original interest rate that may have been applied. Which is fine if you were originally paying say, 50%. But clearly ridiculous if you were paying below their 12% rate.

 

And I do have it in black and white that Cabot do this. It's on a recent SAR. So effectively, Cabot have stated in writing that they make the rules up as they go along, completely disregarding the law in this matter.

 

I do like the sound of Cabot's profits being hit so hard though. How do I join this Cabot Fan Club I keep reading about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello I got the copy from cabot, which means they got the cca from vanquiss and they sent me a copy.

 

now i have this morning got another letter

your account has been escalated to our pre litigation department

 

i dont know what to do and i have noticed that the amount has gone up again to £1603.44 so more charges have been added this amount is nearly all charges from vanquis.

cabot also says in there letter that one of the following will occur

warrent of execution

chargeing order

attachment of earning

order to obtain information external debt collection agency/legal agency

 

 

i dont know what to do or do i just give up and offer 50p a month

i disagree cause most of the amount here is made up from charges

ty for any help and advice ( i have done everything now i dont know what to do they have even had hardship forms filled in as so has vanquis)

 

 

abg

forumbox_top_left.gifforumbox_top_tile.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi all,

New to this thread and looking for some advice.

I am on a DMP with payplan at the moment and everything is going fine.

Today i got a letter, well two in the the same envelope.

From Cabot.This letter is saying they have purchased the debt from Citi Cards.

And i must contact them.The thing is that the debt is being collected from another collection agency called Collect Direct on behalf of Citi [ Through Payplan of course]

The second letter is from Citi saying that they sold the debt to Cabot on the 2nd of september.The problem is the so called letter from Citi looks very suspect,even fake.

Registered vat and various other numbers all wrong as from previous Citi letters.The Citi logo is even black and not red and without the small R on top of the logo.Before i go calling Payplan, Citi and Collect direct, is this the normal thing Cabot do? or in fact are they just trying it on and trying to defraud me out of money?

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...